• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

白内障手术后或屈光性晶状体置换术后三焦点与双焦点衍射型人工晶状体植入的Meta 分析。

Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Laboratory of Ocular Regenerative Medicine and Immunology, Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Sep 27;33(44):e275. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e275. eCollection 2018 Oct 29.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e275
PMID:30369857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6200906/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared the efficacy between trifocal and bifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

METHODS

Through PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, we searched potentially relevant articles published from 1990 to 2018. Defocus curves, visual acuities (VAs) were measured as primary outcomes. Spectacle dependence, postoperative refraction, contrast sensitivity (CS), glare, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured as secondary outcomes. Effects were pooled using random-effects method.

RESULTS

We included 11 clinical trials, with a total of 787 eyes (395 subjects). The trifocal IOL group showed better binocular distance VA corrected with defocus levels of -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.5 diopter than the bifocal IOL group (All ≤ 0.004). The trifocal IOL group showed better monocular uncorrected distance and intermediate VAs (mean difference [MD], -0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07, -0.01; = 0.006 and MD, -0.07 logMAR; 95% CI, -0.13, -0.01; = 0.03, respectively). Postoperative refraction, glare, CS, and HOAs were not significantly different from each other.

CONCLUSION

The overall findings indicate that trifocal diffractive IOL implantation is better than the bifocal diffractive IOL in intermediate VA, and provides similar or better in distance and near VAs without any major deterioration in the visual quality.

摘要

背景

我们比较了三焦点和双焦点衍射型人工晶状体(IOL)植入的疗效。

方法

通过 PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL,我们检索了 1990 年至 2018 年发表的潜在相关文章。离焦曲线和视力(VA)是主要的观察指标。术后屈光不正、对比敏感度(CS)、眩光和高阶像差(HOAs)是次要观察指标。采用随机效应模型对效应进行合并。

结果

我们纳入了 11 项临床试验,共 787 只眼(395 例)。三焦点 IOL 组在 0.5、1.0、1.5 和 2.5 屈光度的离焦水平下双眼远距 VA 矫正值优于双焦点 IOL 组(均 ≤ 0.004)。三焦点 IOL 组在单眼未矫正远距和中距 VA 方面表现更好(差异均数 [MD],-0.04 最小角分辨力对数视力 [logMAR];95%置信区间 [CI],-0.07,-0.01; = 0.006 和 MD,-0.07 logMAR;95% CI,-0.13,-0.01; = 0.03)。术后屈光不正、眩光、CS 和 HOAs 之间无显著差异。

结论

总体而言,三焦点衍射型 IOL 植入在中距 VA 方面优于双焦点衍射型 IOL,在远距和近距 VA 方面提供了相似或更好的视力,且视觉质量无明显恶化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/9bc9064bf409/jkms-33-e275-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/e24ed3e2405a/jkms-33-e275-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/9460d3e6e0be/jkms-33-e275-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/e60a16e3e36d/jkms-33-e275-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/9bc9064bf409/jkms-33-e275-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/e24ed3e2405a/jkms-33-e275-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/9460d3e6e0be/jkms-33-e275-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/e60a16e3e36d/jkms-33-e275-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ab/6200906/9bc9064bf409/jkms-33-e275-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis.白内障手术后或屈光性晶状体置换术后三焦点与双焦点衍射型人工晶状体植入的Meta 分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Sep 27;33(44):e275. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e275. eCollection 2018 Oct 29.
2
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.老花眼患者白内障摘除术后三焦点人工晶状体与双焦点人工晶状体的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 18;6(6):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub2.
3
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.多焦点人工晶状体与白内障摘除术后老视患者的双焦点人工晶状体比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 27;1(1):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub3.
4
Comparison of postoperative visual performance between bifocal and trifocal intraocular Lens based on randomized controlled trails: a meta-analysis.基于随机对照试验的双焦点与三焦点人工晶状体术后视觉性能比较:一项荟萃分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1078-1.
5
Visual and refractive outcomes, spectacle independence, and visual disturbances after cataract or refractive lens exchange surgery: Comparison of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses.白内障或屈光性晶状体置换术后的视觉和屈光结果、不戴镜状态和视觉干扰:两种三焦点人工晶状体的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Nov;45(11):1539-1546. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
Comparison of a trifocal intraocular lens with a +3.0 D bifocal IOL: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial.三焦点人工晶状体与 +3.0 D 双焦点人工晶状体的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验的结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Aug;41(8):1631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.011.
7
Outcomes of combining a trifocal and a low-addition bifocal intraocular lens in patients seeking spectacle independence at all distances.在寻求摆脱所有距离眼镜依赖的患者中联合使用三焦点和低附加双焦点人工晶状体的效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 May;45(5):620-629. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.013.
8
Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Compared with Those of a Monofocal Intraocular Lens.对比单焦点人工晶状体,衍射型三焦点人工晶状体的视觉和患者报告结果。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Feb;128(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses Having an Identical Platform.相同平台的双焦点和三焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉性能比较
J Refract Surg. 2018 Apr 1;34(4):273-280. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180214-01.
10
Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Mix-and-Match Implantation of an Extended Depth-of-Focus and a Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens.混合植入扩展景深和衍射双焦点人工晶状体的临床效果对比分析。
Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Jun 1;48(6):261-266. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000887. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of visual quality improvement after implantation of PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens in cataract patients with different axial lengths.不同眼轴长度白内障患者植入PanOptix三焦点人工晶状体后视觉质量改善情况分析
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):2995-3004. doi: 10.62347/FRJZ4885. eCollection 2024.
2
Trifocal versus monofocal intraocular lens implantation in eyes previously treated with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.三焦点人工晶状体与单焦点人工晶状体植入治疗近视 LASIK 术后眼。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 1;72(Suppl 2):S254-S259. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1844_23. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
In Vivo Measurement of Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration in Patients Implanted With Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses.植入三焦点衍射人工晶状体患者纵向色差的体内测量
J Refract Surg. 2017 Nov 1;33(11):736-742. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170814-01.
2
Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis.三焦点与双焦点人工晶状体的临床性能比较:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186522. eCollection 2017.
3
Postoperative visual performance with a bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lens during a 1-year follow-up.
Clinical prospective intra-individual comparison after mix-and-match implantation of a monofocal EDOF and a diffractive trifocal IOL.
单焦点 EDOF 与衍射型三焦点 IOL 混合植入后的临床前瞻性个体内比较。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Feb;38(2):321-327. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02682-x. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.多焦点人工晶状体与白内障摘除术后老视患者的双焦点人工晶状体比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 27;1(1):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub3.
5
Vision-related Quality of Life after Bilateral Implantation of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.双眼植入单焦点和多焦点人工晶状体后的视力相关生活质量
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):19-26. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v17i1.10166. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
6
Comparative Efficacy Between Trifocal and Bifocal Intraocular Lens Among Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.白内障手术患者中三焦点与双焦点人工晶状体的比较疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 30;8:647268. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.647268. eCollection 2021.
7
Reported Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence Following Bilateral Implantation of the PanOptix Trifocal Intraocular Lens.双侧植入PanOptix三焦点人工晶状体后的患者满意度及摆脱眼镜情况报告
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 6;15:2907-2912. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S323337. eCollection 2021.
8
Spectacle Independence and Quality of Vision After Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens.双眼植入三焦点人工晶状体后的视力独立性和视觉质量
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 17;15:2545-2551. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S318203. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes with Two Trifocal IOLs with Similar Optical Design but Different Materials.两种具有相似光学设计但材料不同的三焦点人工晶状体的视觉性能和患者满意度结果比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 13;14:3237-3247. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S273641. eCollection 2020.
10
Refractive surgery beyond 2020.2020 年后的屈光手术
Eye (Lond). 2021 Feb;35(2):362-382. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
双焦点和三焦点衍射人工晶状体术后1年随访期间的视觉表现
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1528-1533. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.08. eCollection 2017.
4
Quality of life related variables measured for three multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: a prospective randomised clinical trial.三种多焦点衍射型人工晶状体的生活质量相关变量测量:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 May;46(4):380-388. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13084. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
5
Visual Performance With Bifocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Three-Armed Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial.双焦点和三焦点衍射型人工晶状体的视觉性能:一项前瞻性三臂随机多中心临床试验。
J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):655-662. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170504-04.
6
Extended depth of focus intraocular lens: Chromatic performance.扩展焦深人工晶状体:色差性能。
Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Aug 31;8(9):4294-4309. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.004294. eCollection 2017 Sep 1.
7
Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses.三焦点人工晶状体双侧植入与双焦点人工晶状体混合植入的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 1;11:1393-1397. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S139909. eCollection 2017.
8
Clinical comparison of patient outcomes following implantation of trifocal or bifocal intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.三焦点与双焦点人工晶状体植入术后患者临床效果的临床比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 28;7:45337. doi: 10.1038/srep45337.
9
Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.白内障摘除术后多焦点与单焦点人工晶状体的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 12;12(12):CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4.
10
Comparison Between Mix-and-Match Implantation of Bifocal Intraocular Lenses and Bilateral Implantation of Trifocal Intraocular Lenses.双焦点人工晶状体混合植入与三焦点人工晶状体双侧植入的比较
J Refract Surg. 2016 Oct 1;32(10):659-663. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160630-01.