Department of Medicine (Division of Hematology-Oncology), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Botswana UPenn Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.
BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09299-5.
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence and clinical outcomes of screening interventions and implementation trials in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and also appraise some ethical issues related to screening in the region through quantitative and qualitative narrative synthesis of the literature.
We searched Pubmed, OvidMEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies published on breast cancer screening interventions and outcomes in SSA. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the frequency and proportions of extracted variables, and narrative syntheses was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the different screening modalities. The mixed methods appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of studies included in the review.
Fifteen studies were included, which consisted of 72,572 women in ten countries in SSA. 63% (8/15) of the included publications evaluated Clinical Breast Examination (CBE), 47% (7/15) evaluated mammography and 7% (1/15) evaluated ultrasound screening. The cancer detection rate was < 1/1000 to 3.3/1000 and 3.3/100 to 56/1000 for CBE and mammography screening respectively. There was a lot of heterogeneity in CBE methods, target age for screening and no clear documentation of screening interval. Cost-effective analyses showed that CBE screening linked to comprehensive cancer care is most cost effective. There was limited discussion of the ethics of screening, including the possible harms of screening in the absence of linkage to care. The gap between conducting good screening program and the appropriate follow-up with diagnosis and treatment remains one of the major challenges of screening in SSA.
There is insufficient real-world data to support the systematic implementation of national breast cancer screening in SSA. Further research is needed to answer important questions about screening, and national and international partnerships are needed to ensure that appropriate diagnostic and treatment modalities are available to patients who screen positive.
本系统评价旨在评估撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)筛查干预措施和实施试验的证据和临床结局,并通过对该地区筛查相关伦理问题的定量和定性叙述性综合评估,来审查一些伦理问题。
我们检索了 Pubmed、OvidMEDLINE、Embase 和 Web of Science,以确定在 SSA 发表的关于乳腺癌筛查干预措施和结局的研究。使用描述性统计来总结提取变量的频率和比例,并使用叙述性综合评估不同筛查方式的临床结局。使用混合方法评估工具来评估纳入研究的质量。
纳入了 15 项研究,其中包括 SSA 十个国家的 72572 名女性。纳入的出版物中有 63%(8/15)评估了临床乳房检查(CBE),47%(7/15)评估了乳房 X 线摄影术,7%(1/15)评估了超声筛查。癌症检出率为<1/1000 至 3.3/1000 和 3.3/100 至 56/1000,分别用于 CBE 和乳房 X 线摄影术筛查。CBE 方法、筛查的目标年龄存在很大的异质性,并且没有明确记录筛查间隔。成本效益分析表明,与综合癌症护理相结合的 CBE 筛查最具成本效益。对于筛查的伦理问题,包括在没有与护理联系的情况下筛查可能带来的危害,讨论非常有限。在 SSA,实施良好的筛查计划与适当的诊断和治疗后随访之间存在差距,这仍然是筛查面临的主要挑战之一。
没有足够的实际数据来支持在 SSA 系统地实施国家乳腺癌筛查。需要进一步研究来回答关于筛查的重要问题,并且需要国家和国际合作来确保对筛查阳性的患者提供适当的诊断和治疗方法。