• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prioritization of indicators of the quality of care provided to older adults with frailty by key stakeholders from five canadian provinces.五个加拿大省份的主要利益相关者对提供给虚弱老年人的护理质量指标进行优先排序。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02843-9.
2
Co-designing person-centred quality indicator implementation for primary care in Alberta: a consensus study.共同设计艾伯塔省初级保健中以患者为中心的质量指标实施方案:一项共识研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 8;8(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00397-z.
3
Key stakeholders' views on the quality of care and services available to frail seniors in Canada.关键利益相关者对加拿大体弱老年人可获得的护理和服务质量的看法。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0969-y.
4
Development of person-centred quality indicators for aged care assessment services in Australia: A mixed methods study.澳大利亚老年护理评估服务以人为主导的质量指标的制定:混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13958. doi: 10.1111/hex.13958.
5
A national intervention to support frail older adults in primary care: a protocol for an adapted implementation framework.一项支持初级保健中体弱老年人的国家干预措施:适应实施框架的方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Aug 4;21(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02395-4.
6
Transforming primary care for older Canadians living with frailty: mixed methods study protocol for a complex primary care intervention.为衰弱的加拿大老年人提供初级保健服务的转型:一项复杂的初级保健干预措施的混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e042911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042911.
7
Protocol for a mixed-methods and multi-site assessment of the implementation process and outcomes of a new community-based frailty programme.一种新的基于社区的虚弱症项目实施过程和结果的混合方法和多地点评估的方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03254-6.
8
"I can't imagine having to do it on your own": a qualitative study on postoperative transitions in care from the perspectives of older adults with frailty.“我无法想象独自面对这一切”:一项从虚弱老年人视角出发的关于术后照护交接的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04576-9.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Informing the implementation and use of person-centred quality indicators: a mixed methods study on the readiness, barriers and facilitators to implementation in Canada.知情者参与的质量指标的实施和使用:加拿大实施准备度、障碍和促进因素的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 25;12(8):e060441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060441.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations between Length of Stay in Long Term Care Facilities and End of Life Care. Analysis of the PACE Cross-Sectional Study.长期护理机构住院时间与临终关怀的关联。PACE 横断面研究分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2742. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082742.
2
Assessing the Quality of Care Provided to Older Persons with Frailty in Five Canadian Provinces, Using Administrative Data.利用行政数据评估加拿大五个省份为体弱老年人提供的护理质量。
Can J Aging. 2020 Mar;39(1):52-68. doi: 10.1017/S0714980819000205.
3
Population-Based Quality Indicators for End-of-Life Cancer Care: A Systematic Review.基于人群的癌症终末期医疗质量指标:系统评价。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):142-150. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3388.
4
The James Lind Alliance process approach: scoping review.詹姆斯·林德联盟过程方法:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 30;9(8):e027473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027473.
5
Quality assurance as a foundational element for an integrated system of dementia care.质量保证作为痴呆症综合护理系统的基础要素。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Jul 8;32(6):978-990. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2018-0187.
6
A modified Delphi and cross-sectional survey to facilitate selection of optimal outcomes and measures for a systematic review on geriatrician-led care models.采用改良 Delphi 法和横断面调查,以协助选择最佳结局和措施,用于老年病医生主导的护理模式的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 May;109:117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Key stakeholders' views on the quality of care and services available to frail seniors in Canada.关键利益相关者对加拿大体弱老年人可获得的护理和服务质量的看法。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0969-y.
8
Rules to Identify Persons with Frailty in Administrative Health Databases.行政健康数据库中识别衰弱个体的规则。
Can J Aging. 2017 Dec;36(4):514-521. doi: 10.1017/S0714980817000393. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
9
Validation of a modified VOICES survey to measure end-of-life care quality: the CaregiverVoice survey.验证一种改良的 VOICES 调查工具,以测量临终关怀质量:CaregiverVoice 调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Aug 30;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0227-7.
10
Stakeholders' views and experiences of care and interventions for addressing frailty and pre-frailty: A meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.利益相关者对解决衰弱和衰弱前期的护理及干预措施的看法和体验:定性证据的元整合
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0180127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180127. eCollection 2017.

五个加拿大省份的主要利益相关者对提供给虚弱老年人的护理质量指标进行优先排序。

Prioritization of indicators of the quality of care provided to older adults with frailty by key stakeholders from five canadian provinces.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Quebec Excellence Centre on Aging, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02843-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-02843-9
PMID:35197016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8864862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To meet the needs of older adults with frailty better, it is essential to understand which aspects of care are important from their perspective. We therefore sought to assess the importance of a set of quality indicators (QI) for monitoring outcomes in this population.

METHODS

In this mixed-method study, key stakeholders completed a survey on the importance of 36 QIs, and then explained their ratings in a semi-structured interview. Stakeholders included older adults with frailty and their caregivers, healthcare providers (HCPs), and healthcare administrators or policy/decision makers (DMs). We conducted descriptive statistical analyses of quantitative variables, and deductive thematic qualitative analyses of interview transcripts.

RESULTS

The 42 participants (8 older adults, 18 HCPs, and 16 DMs) rated six QIs as more important: increasing the patients' quality of life; increasing healthcare staff skills; decreasing patients' symptoms; decreasing family caregiver burden; increasing patients' satisfaction with care; and increasing family doctor continuity of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Key stakeholders prioritized QIs that focus on outcomes targeted to patients and caregivers, whereas the current healthcare systems generally focus on processes of care. Quality improvement initiatives should therefore take better account of aspects of care that are important for older adults with frailty, such as having a chance to express their individual goals of care, receiving quality communications from HCPs, or monitoring symptoms that they might not spontaneously describe. Our results point to the need for patient-centred care that is oriented toward quality of life for older adults with frailty.

摘要

背景

为了更好地满足衰弱老年人的需求,了解从他们的角度来看哪些护理方面是重要的至关重要。因此,我们试图评估一套质量指标(QI)在监测该人群结果方面的重要性。

方法

在这项混合方法研究中,利益攸关方通过调查对 36 个 QI 的重要性进行了评估,然后在半结构化访谈中对其评分进行了解释。利益攸关方包括衰弱的老年人及其照顾者、医疗保健提供者(HCP)以及医疗保健管理人员或政策/决策者(DM)。我们对定量变量进行了描述性统计分析,并对访谈记录进行了演绎主题定性分析。

结果

42 名参与者(8 名老年人、18 名 HCP 和 16 名 DM)将 6 个 QI 评为更重要:提高患者的生活质量;提高医护人员的技能;减少患者的症状;减轻家庭照顾者的负担;提高患者对护理的满意度;增加家庭医生的护理连续性。

结论

主要利益攸关方优先考虑侧重于患者和照顾者的结果的 QI,而当前的医疗保健系统通常侧重于护理过程。因此,质量改进举措应更好地考虑到对衰弱老年人重要的护理方面,例如有机会表达他们个人的护理目标、从 HCP 那里获得高质量的沟通,或监测他们可能不会主动描述的症状。我们的研究结果表明,需要以生活质量为导向,为衰弱的老年人提供以患者为中心的护理。