International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Glob Health. 2022 Feb 19;12:08001. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.08001. eCollection 2022.
Low-quality diets contribute to the burden of malnutrition and increase the risk of children not achieving their developmental potential. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture programs address the underlying determinants of malnutrition, though their contributions to improving diets do not factor into current nutrition impact modeling tools.
To synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of nutrition-sensitive agriculture programs in improving dietary diversity in young children (6-23.9 months and 6-60 months).
A literature search was conducted for published trials through existing systematic reviews and individual database search of the ISI Web of Science. All dietary diversity measures in the studies selected to be in the analysis were extracted. Estimation of main pooled effects were conducted on outcomes of minimum diet diversity (MDD) and diet diversity score (DDS) using random-effects meta-regression models. We report pooled effect sizes as standardized mean differences (SMDs) or odds ratios (ORs).
Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions have a significant positive impact on the diet diversity scores of children aged 6-23.9 months (SMD = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.09-0.36) and on the odds of reaching minimum diet diversity (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.20, 1.76). Similar impacts are found when analyses are expanded to include studies for children aged 6-60 months (DDS SMD = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.12-0.32) (MDD OR = 1.64, 95% CI: = 1.38-1.94).
Nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions consistently have a positive impact on child dietary diversity. Incorporating this evidence in nutrition modeling tools can contribute to decision-making on the relative benefits of nutrition-sensitive interventions as compared with other maternal, newborn, child health and nutrition (MNCHN) interventions.
低质量饮食是营养不良负担的一个促成因素,并且会增加儿童无法充分发挥其发展潜力的风险。营养敏感型农业方案可解决营养不良的根本决定因素,但这些方案对改善饮食的贡献并未纳入当前的营养影响建模工具。
综合评估营养敏感型农业方案在改善 6-23.9 月龄和 6-60 月龄幼儿饮食多样性方面的有效性。
通过现有系统评价和 ISI Web of Science 单个数据库检索,对已发表的试验进行文献检索。对选择进行分析的研究中所有饮食多样性测量值进行提取。使用随机效应荟萃回归模型对最低饮食多样性(MDD)和饮食多样性评分(DDS)的结局进行主要汇总效应估计。我们报告标准化均数差值(SMD)或比值比(OR)汇总效应大小。
营养敏感型农业干预措施对 6-23.9 月龄儿童的饮食多样性评分有显著的积极影响(SMD=0.22,95%置信区间(CI)=0.09-0.36),并且对达到最低饮食多样性的几率有影响(OR=1.45,95% CI=1.20-1.76)。当分析扩展到包括 6-60 月龄儿童的研究时,也发现了类似的影响(DDS SMD=0.22,95% CI=0.12-0.32)(MDD OR=1.64,95% CI=1.38-1.94)。
营养敏感型农业干预措施对儿童饮食多样性始终有积极影响。将这一证据纳入营养建模工具中,可以为决策提供依据,了解营养敏感型干预措施与其他母婴、新生儿、儿童健康与营养(MNCHN)干预措施相比的相对益处。