Clinical and Health Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2021 Dec;43(10):945-966. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2040433. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
Research indicates that many tools designed for screening dementia are affected by literacy level. The objective of this study was to estimate the overall effects of this confounding factor. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate differences in performance in dementia screening tools between literate and illiterate individuals.
Electronic databases were searched from 1975 to June 2021 to identify empirical studies examining performance in dementia screening tools in literate and illiterate individuals over 50 years old. Data for effect sizes, participant demographic information, and study information were extracted.
We identified 27 studies methodologically suitable for meta-analysis. Multi-level random-effects modeling demonstrated a significant overall effect, with literate participants scoring significantly higher than illiterate participants ( = -1.2, = -1.47, -0.95, < .001). Moderator analyses indicated significant effects of test type and the presence of cognitive impairment on the extent of the difference in performance between literate and illiterate participants. The difference in performance between groups was smaller in screening tests modified for illiterate individuals ( < .01), and in individuals with cognitive impairment ( < .001).
Our findings substantiate the unsuitability of many dementia screening tools for individuals who are illiterate. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize the need for the development and validation of tools that are suitable for individuals of all abilities.
研究表明,许多用于筛查痴呆症的工具都受到文化程度的影响。本研究的目的是估计这一混杂因素的总体影响。进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估在有文化和无文化个体中痴呆症筛查工具的性能差异。
从 1975 年至 2021 年 6 月,电子数据库被搜索,以确定检查有文化和无文化的 50 岁以上个体中痴呆症筛查工具性能的经验研究。提取了效应量、参与者人口统计学信息和研究信息的数据。
我们确定了 27 项在方法学上适合荟萃分析的研究。多层次随机效应模型显示出显著的总体效果,有文化的参与者得分明显高于无文化的参与者( =-1.2, =-1.47,-0.95, <.001)。 调节分析表明,测试类型和认知障碍的存在对有文化和无文化参与者之间的表现差异程度有显著影响。在为无文化个体修改的筛查测试中( <.01),以及在有认知障碍的个体中( <.001),两组之间的表现差异较小。
我们的发现证实了许多痴呆症筛查工具不适合不识字的个体。本系统评价和荟萃分析的结果强调了开发和验证适合所有能力个体的工具的必要性。