Suppr超能文献

在韩国,使用认知障碍筛查测试(CIST)改善对低学历老年人的痴呆筛查。

Improved dementia screening for elderly with low education in South Korea using the Cognitive Impairment Screening Test (CIST).

作者信息

Kang Kyung Wook, Park Gilsoon, Kim Hyunsoo, Cho Soo Hyun, Choi Seong-Min, Choi Kang-Ho, Lee Hak-Loh, Shon Gwangsoon, Kim Byeong C, Kim Hosung

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2025 May 14;19:1599019. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1599019. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used cognitive screening test worldwide; however, it often overdiagnoses older adults with low education levels. In contrast, the Cognitive Impairment Screening Test (CIST), developed by South Korea's Ministry of Health and Welfare, may address this shortcoming. In this study, we compare the CIST and the Korean version of the MMSE (K-MMSE) in older adults with no formal education.

METHODS

We included 100 older adults (≥ 65 years)-27 with normal cognition (NC), 37 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 36 with dementia (DM). All completed both the CIST and K-MMSE. First, we analyzed correlations between the CIST and K-MMSE. Next, we performed an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting for age and sex, to compare group performance. Finally, classification performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, examining the area under the curve (AUC) and other relevant metrics.

RESULTS

The CIST showed positive correlations with both the K-MMSE ( = 0.722) and the K-MMSE z-score ( = 0.625). ANCOVA revealed significant group differences ( < 0.001) for both measures. When distinguishing NC from MCI/DM, the CIST outperformed the K-MMSE, demonstrating a higher AUC (0.869 vs. 0.842) and F1-score (0.697 vs. 0.409).

CONCLUSION

The CIST is a reliable and useful tool for assessing cognitive function, showing advantages over the K-MMSE in detecting cognitive decline among older adults without formal education. Further large-scale validation studies are warranted.

摘要

背景

简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)是全球使用最广泛的认知筛查测试;然而,它常常过度诊断教育水平较低的老年人。相比之下,韩国卫生与福利部开发的认知障碍筛查测试(CIST)可能解决这一缺点。在本研究中,我们比较了CIST与韩国版MMSE(K-MMSE)在未接受过正规教育的老年人中的表现。

方法

我们纳入了100名老年人(≥65岁)——27名认知正常(NC),37名轻度认知障碍(MCI),36名痴呆(DM)。所有人都完成了CIST和K-MMSE。首先,我们分析了CIST与K-MMSE之间的相关性。接下来,我们进行了协方差分析(ANCOVA),对年龄和性别进行了校正,以比较组间表现。最后,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估分类表现,检查曲线下面积(AUC)和其他相关指标。

结果

CIST与K-MMSE(=0.722)和K-MMSE z分数(=0.625)均呈正相关。ANCOVA显示两种测量方法均存在显著的组间差异(<0.001)。在区分NC与MCI/DM时,CIST的表现优于K-MMSE,AUC更高(0.869对0.842),F1分数更高(0.697对0.409)。

结论

CIST是评估认知功能的可靠且有用的工具,在检测未接受过正规教育的老年人认知衰退方面比K-MMSE更具优势。有必要进行进一步的大规模验证研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42f4/12116617/e734d7cbed8c/fnins-19-1599019-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验