• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络中的健康错误信息检测:概述与数据科学方法。

Health Misinformation Detection in the Social Web: An Overview and a Data Science Approach.

机构信息

Department of Informatics, Systems, and Communication (DISCo), University of Milano-Bicocca, Edificio U14-ABACUS, Viale Sarca, 336, 20126 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;19(4):2173. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042173.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19042173
PMID:35206359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8872515/
Abstract

The increasing availability of online content these days raises several questions about effective access to information. In particular, the possibility for almost everyone to generate content with no traditional intermediary, if on the one hand led to a process of "information democratization", on the other hand, has negatively affected the genuineness of the information disseminated. This issue is particularly relevant when accessing health information, which impacts both the individual and societal level. Often, laypersons do not have sufficient health literacy when faced with the decision to rely or not rely on this information, and expert users cannot cope with such a large amount of content. For these reasons, there is a need to develop automated solutions that can assist both experts and non-experts in discerning between genuine and non-genuine health information. To make a contribution in this area, in this paper we proceed to the study and analysis of distinct groups of features and machine learning techniques that can be effective to assess misinformation in online health-related content, whether in the form of Web pages or social media content. To this aim, and for evaluation purposes, we consider several publicly available datasets that have only recently been generated for the assessment of health misinformation under different perspectives.

摘要

如今,越来越多的在线内容引发了人们对于有效获取信息的几个问题。特别是,几乎任何人都可以在没有传统中介的情况下生成内容,如果一方面导致了“信息民主化”的过程,另一方面又对传播的信息的真实性产生了负面影响。当涉及到健康信息时,这个问题尤其重要,因为它会影响到个人和社会层面。通常情况下,非专业人士在决定是否依赖这些信息时,健康素养可能不足,而专家用户也无法应对如此大量的内容。出于这些原因,需要开发自动化解决方案,以便专家和非专业人士能够区分真实和非真实的健康信息。为了在这一领域做出贡献,在本文中,我们对可以有效评估在线健康相关内容(无论是网页形式还是社交媒体内容)中的错误信息的不同特征组和机器学习技术进行了研究和分析。为此,我们考虑了几个最近才为从不同角度评估健康错误信息而生成的公开可用数据集。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1516/8872515/a158da88f2e9/ijerph-19-02173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1516/8872515/ab43b2d037ca/ijerph-19-02173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1516/8872515/eab6f8e648e1/ijerph-19-02173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1516/8872515/a158da88f2e9/ijerph-19-02173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1516/8872515/ab43b2d037ca/ijerph-19-02173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1516/8872515/eab6f8e648e1/ijerph-19-02173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1516/8872515/a158da88f2e9/ijerph-19-02173-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Misinformation Detection in the Social Web: An Overview and a Data Science Approach.社交网络中的健康错误信息检测:概述与数据科学方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;19(4):2173. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042173.
2
Vec4Cred: a model for health misinformation detection in web pages.Vec4Cred:一种用于网页中健康错误信息检测的模型。
Multimed Tools Appl. 2023;82(4):5271-5290. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-13368-z. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Characterizing and Identifying the Prevalence of Web-Based Misinformation Relating to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: Machine Learning Approach.描述和识别与阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗相关的网络错误信息的流行情况:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 22;23(12):e30753. doi: 10.2196/30753.
4
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media.社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息传播的系统文献综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Nov;240:112552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
5
Using Machine Learning-Based Approaches for the Detection and Classification of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Misinformation: Infodemiology Study of Reddit Discussions.基于机器学习的方法在人乳头瘤病毒疫苗错误信息检测和分类中的应用:对 Reddit 讨论的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 5;23(8):e26478. doi: 10.2196/26478.
6
The "Loci" of Misinformation and Its Correction in Peer- and Expert-Led Online Communities for Mental Health: Content Analysis.错误信息的“病灶”及其在心理健康同行和专家主导的在线社区中的纠正:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 18;25:e44656. doi: 10.2196/44656.
7
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
8
Health Literacy and Critical Lecture as Key Elements to Detect and Reply to Nutrition Misinformation on Social Media: Analysis between Spanish Healthcare Professionals.健康素养和批判性思维是识别和回应社交媒体中营养错误信息的关键要素:西班牙医疗保健专业人员的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;20(1):23. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010023.
9
Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak.错误信息与美国埃博拉疫情传播危机:分析与引发恐慌的传染病爆发相关的社交媒体信息的真实性和内容
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3.
10
Automatically Appraising the Credibility of Vaccine-Related Web Pages Shared on Social Media: A Twitter Surveillance Study.自动评估社交媒体上分享的疫苗相关网页的可信度:一项推特监测研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 4;21(11):e14007. doi: 10.2196/14007.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to healthy ınformatıon: the ınteractıon of medıa lıteracy and health lıteracy.获取健康信息:媒体素养与健康素养的相互作用。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 16;25(1):2800. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24022-2.
2
Analysing health misinformation with advanced centrality metrics in online social networks.利用在线社交网络中的先进中心性指标分析健康错误信息。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jun 16;4(6):e0000888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000888. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Use of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model for COVID-19 Fact-Checking: Development and Usability Study.

本文引用的文献

1
AutoDiscern: rating the quality of online health information with hierarchical encoder attention-based neural networks.AutoDiscern:基于层次编码器注意力的神经网络对在线健康信息进行质量评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01131-z.
2
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining.BioBERT:一种用于生物医学文本挖掘的预训练生物医学语言表示模型。
Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 15;36(4):1234-1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682.
3
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.
使用检索增强大语言模型进行COVID-19事实核查:开发与可用性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e66098. doi: 10.2196/66098.
4
Racial and Demographic Disparities in Susceptibility to Health Misinformation on Social Media: National Survey-Based Analysis.社交媒体健康错误信息易感性的种族和人口统计学差异:基于全国性调查的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 6;26:e55086. doi: 10.2196/55086.
5
Online Health Search Via Multidimensional Information Quality Assessment Based on Deep Language Models: Algorithm Development and Validation.基于深度语言模型的多维信息质量评估在线健康搜索:算法开发与验证
JMIR AI. 2024 May 2;3:e42630. doi: 10.2196/42630.
6
Educational Video Intervention to Improve Health Misinformation Identification on WhatsApp Among Saudi Arabian Population: Pre-Post Intervention Study.教育视频干预以改善沙特阿拉伯人群在WhatsApp上对健康错误信息的识别:干预前后研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 17;8:e50211. doi: 10.2196/50211.
7
Evaluating online health information quality using machine learning and deep learning: A systematic literature review.使用机器学习和深度学习评估在线健康信息质量:一项系统的文献综述。
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 20;9:20552076231212296. doi: 10.1177/20552076231212296. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Public Health Policy, Political Ideology, and Public Emotion Related to COVID-19 in the U.S.美国与 COVID-19 相关的公共卫生政策、政治意识形态和公众情绪
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 29;20(21):6993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20216993.
9
Knowledge and attitude toward oral health behavior of overseas students during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间留学生口腔健康行为的知识和态度。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 28;23(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03420-1.
10
Breast cancer prevention and treatment misinformation on Twitter: An analysis of two languages.推特上关于乳腺癌防治的错误信息:两种语言的分析
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 6;9:20552076231205742. doi: 10.1177/20552076231205742. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
社交机器人传播低可信度内容。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 20;9(1):4787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
4
Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media.应对社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2417-2418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16865.
5
Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.基于网络的健康信息中的信任与可信度:综述及未来研究议程
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 19;19(6):e218. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7579.
6
Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis.关键健康素养:综述与批判性分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 12.
7
HON label and DISCERN as content quality indicators of health-related websites.健康相关网站的内容质量指标:HON 标签和 DISCERN。
Psychiatr Q. 2012 Mar;83(1):15-27. doi: 10.1007/s11126-011-9179-x.
8
Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness.医学2.0:社交网络、协作、参与、辅助调解及开放性。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Aug 25;10(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1030.
9
Determinants of Internet use as a preferred source of information on personal health.将互联网作为个人健康信息首选来源的决定因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Nov;77(11):723-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
10
From intermediation to disintermediation and apomediation: new models for consumers to access and assess the credibility of health information in the age of Web2.0.从媒介中介到去中介化和非中介化:Web2.0时代消费者获取和评估健康信息可信度的新模式。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):162-6.