• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从更多检测到更智能的检测:数据指导的 SARS-CoV-2 检测选择,荷兰,2020 年 5 月至 9 月。

From more testing to smart testing: data-guided SARS-CoV-2 testing choices, the Netherlands, May to September 2020.

机构信息

Department of Viroscience, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Euro Surveill. 2022 Feb;27(8). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.8.2100702.

DOI:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.8.2100702
PMID:35209972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8874867/
Abstract

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays are more sensitive than rapid antigen detection assays (RDT) and can detect viral RNA even after an individual is no longer infectious. RDT can reduce the time to test and the results might better correlate with infectiousness.AimWe assessed the ability of five RDT to identify infectious COVID-19 cases and systematically recorded the turnaround time of RT-PCR testing.MethodsSensitivity of RDT was determined using a serially diluted SARS-CoV-2 stock with known viral RNA concentration. The probability of detecting infectious virus at a given viral load was calculated using logistic regression of viral RNA concentration and matched culture results of 78 specimens from randomly selected non-hospitalised cases. The probability of each RDT to detect infectious cases was calculated as the sum of the projected probabilities for viral isolation success for every viral RNA load found at the time of diagnosis in 1,739 confirmed non-hospitalised COVID-19 cases.ResultsThe distribution of quantification cycle values and estimated RNA loads for patients reporting to drive-through testing was skewed to high RNA loads. With the most sensitive RDT (Abbott and SD Biosensor), 97.30% (range: 88.65-99.77) of infectious individuals would be detected. This decreased to 92.73% (range: 60.30-99.77) for Coris BioConcept and GenBody, and 75.53% (range: 17.55-99.77) for RapiGEN. Only 32.9% of RT-PCR results were available on the same day as specimen collection.ConclusionThe most sensitive RDT detected infectious COVID-19 cases with high sensitivity and may considerably improve containment through more rapid isolation and contact tracing.

摘要

背景

SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测比快速抗原检测 (RDT) 更灵敏,甚至可以在个体不再具有传染性后检测到病毒 RNA。RDT 可以减少检测时间,并且结果可能与传染性更好地相关。

目的

我们评估了五种 RDT 识别传染性 COVID-19 病例的能力,并系统地记录了 RT-PCR 检测的周转时间。

方法

使用具有已知病毒 RNA 浓度的 SARS-CoV-2 稀释储备液来确定 RDT 的灵敏度。使用逻辑回归对病毒 RNA 浓度和随机选择的非住院病例的 78 个标本的匹配培养结果进行分析,计算在给定病毒载量下检测到传染性病毒的概率。计算每种 RDT 检测传染性病例的概率,方法是将在 1739 例确诊的非住院 COVID-19 病例中诊断时发现的每一个病毒 RNA 载量的预测成功概率相加。

结果

报告进行驾车检测的患者的定量循环值和估计 RNA 载量分布呈偏态分布,偏向高 RNA 载量。使用最敏感的 RDT(雅培和 SD 生物科学),97.30%(范围:88.65-99.77)的传染性个体将被检测到。这对于 Coris BioConcept 和 GenBody 降低到 92.73%(范围:60.30-99.77),对于 RapiGEN 降低到 75.53%(范围:17.55-99.77)。只有 32.9%的 RT-PCR 结果与标本采集当天可用。

结论

最敏感的 RDT 以高灵敏度检测传染性 COVID-19 病例,通过更快速的隔离和接触者追踪,可以大大改善控制效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/021b/8874867/4c814462d78e/2100702-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/021b/8874867/8c58f9d5f0ed/2100702-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/021b/8874867/4c814462d78e/2100702-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/021b/8874867/8c58f9d5f0ed/2100702-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/021b/8874867/4c814462d78e/2100702-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
From more testing to smart testing: data-guided SARS-CoV-2 testing choices, the Netherlands, May to September 2020.从更多检测到更智能的检测:数据指导的 SARS-CoV-2 检测选择,荷兰,2020 年 5 月至 9 月。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Feb;27(8). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.8.2100702.
2
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
Daily SARS-CoV-2 Nasal Antigen Tests Miss Infected and Presumably Infectious People Due to Viral Load Differences among Specimen Types.由于标本类型中病毒载量的差异,每日 SARS-CoV-2 鼻拭子抗原检测会漏检感染和可能具有传染性的人群。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Aug 17;11(4):e0129523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01295-23. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Comparison of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid point-of-care antigen tests: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study.七种商业化 SARS-CoV-2 快速即时检测抗原试剂盒的比较:一项单中心实验室评估研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jul;2(7):e311-e319. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00056-2. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
5
Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests for people with suspected COVID-19 in the community.社区中怀疑感染 COVID-19 的人群使用快速抗原检测进行 SARS-CoV-2 感染的自我检测。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 May;28(5):695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.07.039. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021.建立一个样本面板,用于分散式技术评估 31 种用于 SARS-CoV-2 抗原的快速诊断检测试剂的敏感性,德国,2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(44). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100442.
7
Comparison Between GenBody COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Kit and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.GenBody COVID-19 快速抗原试剂盒与 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 的比较。
Clin Lab. 2022 Jun 1;68(6). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210717.
8
Head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of saliva and nasal rapid antigen SARS-CoV-2 self-testing: cross-sectional study.头对头比较唾液和鼻腔快速抗原 SARS-CoV-2 自我检测的准确性:横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Oct 24;20(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02603-x.
9
Sars-Cov-2 Infection Screening Using Two Serological Testing Methods.采用两种血清学检测方法对 SARS-CoV-2 感染进行筛查。
Niger J Physiol Sci. 2020 Dec 31;35(2):117-121.
10
Antigen rapid tests, nasopharyngeal PCR and saliva PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2: A prospective comparative clinical trial.抗原快速检测、鼻咽 PCR 和唾液 PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2:一项前瞻性比较临床试验。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282150. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 infection biomarkers in a household transmission study.家庭传播研究中 SARS-CoV-2 感染生物标志物的动力学。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 29;14(1):12365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62835-0.
2
Designing school reopening in the COVID-19 pre-vaccination period in Bogotá, Colombia: A modeling study.哥伦比亚波哥大新冠疫苗接种前时期学校复课的设计:一项建模研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;2(6):e0000467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000467. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinical Validation of GenBody COVID-19 Ag, Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Rapid Antigen Tests for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in European Adult Population.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts of individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: cross sectional study.快速抗原检测对确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染个体无症状和症状前密切接触者的诊断准确性:横断面研究
BMJ. 2021 Jul 27;374:n1676. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1676.
2
Increased transmissibility and global spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern as at June 2021.截至2021年6月,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变异株的传播性增加及其在全球的传播情况。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jun;26(24). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.24.2100509.
3
Detection of the new SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 in five SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (RATs), Germany, March 2021.
GenBody新冠病毒抗原检测试剂盒用于欧洲成年人群中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的鼻拭子和鼻咽拭子快速抗原检测的临床验证
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 8;11(2):493. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020493.
4
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Air and on Surfaces in Rooms of Infected Nursing Home Residents.在感染新冠病毒的养老院居民的房间内空气中和表面上检测到 SARS-CoV-2。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Jan 12;67(1):129-140. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac056.
5
A Multicenter Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy Study of SureStatus, an Affordable, WHO Emergency Use-Listed, Rapid, Point-Of-Care Antigen-Detecting Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2.一项关于 SureStatus 的多中心临床诊断准确性研究,SureStatus 是一种负担得起的、世界卫生组织紧急使用清单上列出的、快速的、即时抗原检测诊断 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断测试。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0122922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01229-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
COVID-19 isolation strategies: What have we learned.COVID-19 隔离策略:我们学到了什么。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022 Sep-Oct;49:102416. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102416. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
7
Performance and application evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay.新型冠状病毒抗原检测试剂的性能评估和应用评价。
J Med Virol. 2022 Aug;94(8):3548-3553. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27798. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
8
Test sensitivity for infection versus infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2.针对新型冠状病毒感染与传染性的检测敏感性
MDE Manage Decis Econ. 2022 Sep;43(6):1880-1887. doi: 10.1002/mde.3496. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
9
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) compared with RT-PCR: a prospective cohort study.使用 Panbio COVID-19 抗原快速检测试剂盒(Abbott)与 RT-PCR 相比,对无症状个体进行 SARS-CoV-2 感染筛查:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 13;11(10):e048206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048206.
10
Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.新型 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 12;18(8):e1003735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003735. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2021 年 3 月,德国在五种 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测(RAT)中检测到新型 SARS-CoV-2 关注变异株 B.1.1.7 和 B.1.351。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Apr;26(16). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.16.2100413.
4
Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England.评估 SARS-CoV-2 谱系 B.1.1.7 在英国的传播能力。
Nature. 2021 May;593(7858):266-269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03470-x. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Duration and key determinants of infectious virus shedding in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).COVID-19 住院患者中感染性病毒排出的持续时间和关键决定因素。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 11;12(1):267. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20568-4.
6
Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity - A Strategy for Containment.重新思考新冠病毒检测敏感性——一种遏制策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025631. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID-19.建模测试、接触者追踪和家庭隔离对 COVID-19 第二波疫情的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):964-971. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0931-9. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
8
Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.新冠病毒接触者追踪策略有效性延迟的影响:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing and analysis for informed public health decision-making in the Netherlands.荷兰开展 SARS-CoV-2 全基因组快速测序和分析,为明智的公共卫生决策提供信息。
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1405-1410. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0997-y. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.住院 COVID-19 患者的病毒学评估。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.