Suppr超能文献

肺康复方法对 COVID-19 患者呼吸困难、运动能力、疲劳、肺功能和生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Institute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Oct;103(10):2051-2062. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with COVID-19.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2020 to April 2022.

DATA SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PR on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and QoL in patients with COVID-19.

DATA EXTRACTION

The mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI were estimated for all the outcome measures using random effect models. The following data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers: (1) first author; (2) publication year; (3) nationality; (4) number of patients included (5) comorbidities; (6) ventilatory support; (7) length of inpatient stay; (8) type of PR; (9) outcome measures; and (10) main findings. The risk of bias was evaluated using the cochrane risk of bias tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 8 RCTs involving 449 participants were included in the review. PR was found to be significantly effective in improving dyspnea (5 studies, SMD -2.11 [95% CI, -2.96 to -1.27; P<.001]) and exercise capacity (MD 65.85 m [95% CI, 42.86 to 88.83; P<.001]) in patients with both acute and chronic COVID-19 with mild to severe symptoms, whereas fatigue (MD -2.42 [95% CI, -2.72 to -2.11, P<.05]) and lung functions (MD 0.26 L [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48, P<.05]) were significantly improved in acute COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. The effect of PR on QoL was inconsistent across studies. PR was found to be safe and feasible for patients with COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from studies indicates that PR program is superior to no intervention in improving dyspnea, exercise capacity, lung functions, and fatigue in patients with COVID-19. PR appears to be safe and beneficial for both acute and chronic COVID-19 patients.

摘要

目的

系统评价和定量评估肺康复(PR)对 COVID-19 患者呼吸困难、肺功能、疲劳、运动能力和生活质量(QoL)的影响。

资料来源

从 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月,检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库。

资料选择

评估 PR 对 COVID-19 患者呼吸困难、肺功能、疲劳、运动能力和 QoL 影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。

资料提取

使用随机效应模型估计所有结局指标的均数差(MD)和 95%置信区间(CI)。由 2 名独立 reviewers 提取以下数据:(1)第一作者;(2)发表年份;(3)国籍;(4)纳入患者人数;(5)合并症;(6)通气支持;(7)住院时间;(8)PR 类型;(9)结局指标;(10)主要发现。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。

资料综合

共纳入 8 项 RCT 研究,涉及 449 名患者。结果显示,PR 可显著改善急性和慢性 COVID-19 患者(症状轻至中重度)的呼吸困难(5 项研究,SMD-2.11[95%CI,-2.96 至-1.27;P<.001])和运动能力(MD65.85m[95%CI,42.86 至 88.83;P<.001]),且急性 COVID-19 患者(症状轻)的疲劳(MD-2.42[95%CI,-2.72 至-2.11,P<.05])和肺功能(MD0.26L[95%CI,0.04 至 0.48,P<.05])也显著改善,但 PR 对 QoL 的影响在各研究中不一致。研究表明,PR 对 COVID-19 患者是安全且可行的。

结论

现有证据表明,PR 方案优于不干预,可改善 COVID-19 患者的呼吸困难、运动能力、肺功能和疲劳。PR 对急性和慢性 COVID-19 患者均安全且有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff4/9334878/8ba67e64d5a4/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验