• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创骶髂关节融合术:使用基于原则的骶髂关节融合系统的2年影像学和临床结果

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System.

作者信息

Cross William W, Delbridge Arnold, Hales Donald, Fielding Louis C

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, MN 55905, United States.

Cedar Valley Medical Specialists PC Waterloo, Iowa, IA 50704, United States.

出版信息

Open Orthop J. 2018 Jan 17;12:7-16. doi: 10.2174/1874325001812010007. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2174/1874325001812010007
PMID:29430266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5791206/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration is a common source of low back pain (LBP). Minimally invasive (MI) SIJ fusion procedures have demonstrated meaningful clinical improvement. A recently developed MI SIJ fusion system incorporates decortication, placement of bone graft and fixation with threaded implants (DC/BG/TF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients who had MI SIJ fusion with DC/BG/TF were enrolled at three centers. Fusion was assessed in CT images obtained 12 and 24 months postoperatively by an independent radiographic core laboratory. LBP was assessed using a 0-10 numerical pain scale (NPS) preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 12 months, 15/19 patients (79%) had bridging bone across the SIJ, and at 24 months 17/18 patients (94%) available for follow-up had SIJ fusion. Of the patients with bridging bone 88% had fusion within the decorticated area, with solid fusion in 83%. A significant reduction in NPS scores was demonstrated, representing a 73% reduction in average low back pain.

CONCLUSION

The patients in this series demonstrated significant improvement in LBP. Fusion rates at 24 months demonstrate promise for this system, which utilizes the established orthopedic principles of DC/BG/TF to achieve arthrodesis. Further study is warranted to demonstrate comparative fusion rates for different implant systems.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节(SIJ)退变是下腰痛(LBP)的常见原因。微创(MI)骶髂关节融合手术已显示出有意义的临床改善。一种最近开发的微创骶髂关节融合系统包括去皮质、植骨和使用带螺纹植入物固定(DC/BG/TF)。

患者与方法

在三个中心招募了19例行DC/BG/TF微创骶髂关节融合术的患者。由独立的放射影像核心实验室在术后12个月和24个月获得的CT图像中评估融合情况。术前以及术后12个月和24个月使用0-10数字疼痛量表(NPS)评估下腰痛情况。

结果

在12个月时,19例患者中有15例(79%)在骶髂关节处有骨桥形成,在24个月时,18例可进行随访的患者中有17例(94%)实现了骶髂关节融合。在有骨桥形成的患者中,88%在去皮质区域内实现了融合,其中83%为牢固融合。NPS评分显著降低,平均下腰痛减轻了73%。

结论

该系列患者的下腰痛有显著改善。24个月时的融合率表明该系统有前景,该系统利用了DC/BG/TF既定的骨科原则来实现关节融合。有必要进一步研究以证明不同植入系统的比较融合率情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/8e8773c5d678/TOORTHJ-12-7_F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/4d56ff005779/TOORTHJ-12-7_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/7fae22efecf6/TOORTHJ-12-7_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/89323ad2003b/TOORTHJ-12-7_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/b433f8ae0a84/TOORTHJ-12-7_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/8e8773c5d678/TOORTHJ-12-7_F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/4d56ff005779/TOORTHJ-12-7_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/7fae22efecf6/TOORTHJ-12-7_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/89323ad2003b/TOORTHJ-12-7_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/b433f8ae0a84/TOORTHJ-12-7_F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1c/5791206/8e8773c5d678/TOORTHJ-12-7_F5.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System.微创骶髂关节融合术:使用基于原则的骶髂关节融合系统的2年影像学和临床结果
Open Orthop J. 2018 Jan 17;12:7-16. doi: 10.2174/1874325001812010007. eCollection 2018.
2
Revision of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fixation: Technical Considerations and Case Studies Using Decortication and Threaded Implant Fixation.微创骶髂关节固定术的修订:使用去皮质和螺纹植入物固定的技术考量与病例研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Feb 27;11(1):8. doi: 10.14444/4008. eCollection 2017.
3
Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review.导航下减压和直接关节融合治疗微创骶髂关节融合中使用圆柱螺纹植入物后的融合和患者报告结局:病例系列和文献复习。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jul;55(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.FOCUS23145.
4
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
5
CT Scan and Clinical Outcomes of Novel Lateral-Oblique Percutaneous Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Fixation: Technique and Literature Review.新型外侧斜行经皮骶髂关节固定术的CT扫描及临床结果:技术与文献综述
Cureus. 2021 Jul 15;13(7):e16408. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16408. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.用于微创骶髂关节融合的三角形钛植入物:一项前瞻性多中心试验的2年随访
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Apr 20;10:13. doi: 10.14444/3013. eCollection 2016.
7
First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint.新型微创骶髂关节融合系统的初步临床结果。
Technol Health Care. 2022;30(5):1139-1145. doi: 10.3233/THC-213348.
8
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using a Novel Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screw: Preliminary 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results of a 2-Year Prospective Study.使用新型羟基磷灰石涂层螺钉的微创骶髂关节融合术:一项为期2年的前瞻性研究的初步1年临床和影像学结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:493-497. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.046. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Surgical and clinical efficacy of sacroiliac joint fusion: a systematic review of the literature.骶髂关节融合术的手术和临床疗效:文献系统评价。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jul;23(1):59-66. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14516. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
10
Minimally Invasive Inferior Intra-Articular Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Successful Application of Osseous Stabilization Using Allograft Bone.微创下关节内骶髂关节融合术:同种异体骨骨稳定技术的成功应用
Orthop Res Rev. 2022 Nov 16;14:429-435. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S387104. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of 3D virtual surgical planning in sacroiliac joint fusion.三维虚拟手术规划在骶髂关节融合中的作用。
Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 22;5:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104334. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical outcome measures following lateral versus posterior sacroiliac joint fusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis.骶髂关节外侧与后侧融合术后的临床结局指标:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 12;5:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104212. eCollection 2025.
3
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Assessment of Fusion Following Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合手术后融合情况的评估
Cureus. 2017 Oct 20;9(10):e1787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1787.
2
Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion.骶髂关节固定或融合后的手术翻修
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Jan 19;11(1):5. doi: 10.14444/4005. eCollection 2017.
3
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合术:微创骶髂关节融合手术后一年的临床及影像学结果
微创外侧、后侧及后外侧骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300.
4
Utility of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review of the literature.微创经皮骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛的效用:文献系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):974-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08629-4. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
5
Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion: current insights and a comprehensive literature review.微创骶髂关节融合术:当前见解与全面文献综述
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jul 1;54(6):1185-1191. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5898. eCollection 2024.
6
Safety and Preliminary Effectiveness of Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion by Interventional Pain Physicians: A Retrospective Analysis.介入疼痛科医生经皮侧方骶髂关节融合术的安全性及初步疗效:一项回顾性分析
J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 17;17:2147-2153. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S462072. eCollection 2024.
7
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
8
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.
9
Minimally Invasive Postero-Inferior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Surgical Technique and Procedural Details.微创后下骶髂关节融合术:手术技术及操作细节
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):1136. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071136.
10
Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes After Revision Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.翻修性骶髂关节融合术后患者报告的结局和影像学结果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):250-257. doi: 10.14444/8421. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30;10:679-689. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010679. eCollection 2016.
4
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验的两年结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028. eCollection 2016.
5
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.用于微创骶髂关节融合的三角形钛植入物:一项前瞻性多中心试验的2年随访
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Apr 20;10:13. doi: 10.14444/3013. eCollection 2016.
6
Two-Year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part II: Radiographic Findings.微创外侧与微创经椎间孔椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的两年比较结果:第二部分:影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S133-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001472.
7
Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.微创骶髂关节融合术的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Dec 18;8:1-14. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S94266. eCollection 2016.
8
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.使用三角形钛植入物的微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验:12个月的结果。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988.
9
A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.一项利用外侧经关节技术进行微创骶髂关节融合术的系统评价。
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Jul 22;9:40. doi: 10.14444/2040. eCollection 2015.
10
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.使用三角形钛植入物与非手术治疗的骶髂关节融合术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的六个月结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Mar 5;9:6. doi: 10.14444/2006. eCollection 2015.