Suppr超能文献

成人认知、情感和躯体共情量表

The Cognitive, Affective and Somatic Empathy Scales for Adults.

作者信息

Raine Adrian, Chen Frances R, Waller Rebecca

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania.

Georgia State University.

出版信息

Pers Individ Dif. 2022 Feb;185. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111238. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

Abstract

The Cognitive, Affective and Somatic Empathy Scales (CASES) assess three forms of empathy, each with subscales for positive and negative empathy. The present study extends this child instrument to adults and examines its factor structure and construct validity. A secondary aim is to investigate the under-researched area of positive empathy. Community samples totaling 2,604 adults completed the CASES for adults, together with scales assessing construct validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor cognitive-affective-somatic model and a two-factor positive-negative empathy model. Findings were replicated in a second independent sample. Internal reliabilities ranged from .80 to .92. Individuals with higher psychopathy and stimulation-seeking scores were less impaired in their empathic reactions to positive relative to negative valence events, suggesting that they are relatively capable of responding emotionally to rewarding events. Somatic empathy was most strongly associated with pleasure in affective touch and with female > male gender differences. While proactive aggression was associated with reduced cognitive and affective empathy, reactive aggression was associated with empathy. Findings provide initial support for the utility of CASES for assessing different forms of empathy and suggest that the balance between positive and negative empathy could provide new insights into psychological traits.

摘要

认知、情感和躯体共情量表(CASES)评估了三种共情形式,每种形式都有积极共情和消极共情的子量表。本研究将这种儿童量表扩展到成人,并检验其因子结构和结构效度。第二个目的是调查积极共情这个研究较少的领域。共有2604名成年人的社区样本完成了成人版CASES以及评估结构效度的量表。验证性因素分析支持三因素认知-情感-躯体模型和两因素积极-消极共情模型。研究结果在第二个独立样本中得到了重复。内部信度在0.80至0.92之间。精神病态得分和寻求刺激得分较高的个体,相对于负性效价事件,对正性事件的共情反应受损程度较小,这表明他们相对能够对奖励事件做出情绪反应。躯体共情与情感触摸中的愉悦感以及女性>男性的性别差异最为密切相关。虽然主动性攻击与认知和情感共情的降低有关,但反应性攻击与共情有关。研究结果为CASES在评估不同形式共情方面的效用提供了初步支持,并表明积极共情和消极共情之间的平衡可以为心理特质提供新的见解。

相似文献

1
The Cognitive, Affective and Somatic Empathy Scales for Adults.成人认知、情感和躯体共情量表
Pers Individ Dif. 2022 Feb;185. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111238. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
3
The Cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scales (CASES) for Children.儿童认知、情感和躯体共情量表(CASES)。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Jan-Feb;47(1):24-37. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1295383. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between Subtypes of Empathy and Aggression in High-Risk Adolescents.高危青少年共情亚型与攻击性之间的关联。
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2024 Mar;46(1):62-75. doi: 10.1007/s10862-023-10112-1. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced sensitivity to affiliation and psychopathic traits.对归属感和精神病态特征的敏感性降低。
Personal Disord. 2021 Sep;12(5):437-447. doi: 10.1037/per0000423. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验