Yazdanbakhsh M, Eckmann C M, Bot A A, Roos D
Infect Immun. 1986 Jul;53(1):192-8. doi: 10.1128/iai.53.1.192-198.1986.
The ability of normal human eosinophils to ingest and kill Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was investigated and compared with the reactions shown by neutrophils from the same donors. The rate of phagocytosis of S. aureus by eosinophils was 50% of that shown by neutrophils. Unlike neutrophils, eosinophils were not able to kill ingested S. aureus at low bacterium/phagocyte ratios. The degree of S. aureus killing increased with increasing ratios, being equal to that of neutrophils when bacterium/phagocyte ratios of about 15 were used. This was probably due to a better triggering of the eosinophil oxidase system at high bacterium/phagocyte ratios. The early kinetics of the association of bacteria with eosinophils, the perforation of the bacterial envelope and the inactivation of bacterial proteins, was monitored in the ML-35 mutant strain of E. coli. The association of E. coli with eosinophils was 70% of that with neutrophils. Eosinophils had only 25% of the capacity of neutrophils to perforate the E. coli envelope. E. coli loses its colony-forming ability when the bacterial envelope has been perforated, indicating that eosinophils also kill E. coli more slowly than do neutrophils. This was confirmed with a plating assay for colony formation. The perforation of E. coli is independent of peroxidase-mediated reactions. Hence, the defective bactericidal action of eosinophils is probably not related to the differences between myeloperoxidase and eosinophil peroxidase. On the other hand, the inactivation of bacterial proteins is peroxidase dependent and was also seen to occur to a lesser extent in eosinophils compared with neutrophils. We conclude that eosinophils ingest E. coli but only slowly perforate (kill) these bacteria and barely inactivate the bacterial enzymes. In contrast, neutrophils quickly ingest and perforate (kill) E. coli and quickly inactivate the bacterial enzymes.
研究了正常人嗜酸性粒细胞摄取和杀死金黄色葡萄球菌及大肠杆菌的能力,并与来自相同供体的中性粒细胞的反应进行了比较。嗜酸性粒细胞对金黄色葡萄球菌的吞噬率是中性粒细胞的50%。与中性粒细胞不同,在低细菌/吞噬细胞比例下,嗜酸性粒细胞无法杀死摄取的金黄色葡萄球菌。金黄色葡萄球菌的杀伤程度随比例增加而增加,当使用约15的细菌/吞噬细胞比例时,与中性粒细胞的杀伤程度相同。这可能是由于在高细菌/吞噬细胞比例下嗜酸性粒细胞氧化酶系统得到了更好的触发。在大肠杆菌的ML-35突变株中监测了细菌与嗜酸性粒细胞结合的早期动力学、细菌包膜的穿孔以及细菌蛋白质的失活情况。大肠杆菌与嗜酸性粒细胞的结合率是与中性粒细胞结合率的70%。嗜酸性粒细胞穿孔大肠杆菌包膜的能力仅为中性粒细胞的25%。当细菌包膜被穿孔时,大肠杆菌失去其集落形成能力,这表明嗜酸性粒细胞杀死大肠杆菌的速度也比中性粒细胞慢。这通过集落形成的平板试验得到了证实。大肠杆菌的穿孔与过氧化物酶介导的反应无关。因此,嗜酸性粒细胞杀菌作用的缺陷可能与髓过氧化物酶和嗜酸性粒细胞过氧化物酶之间的差异无关。另一方面,细菌蛋白质的失活是依赖过氧化物酶的,并且与中性粒细胞相比,在嗜酸性粒细胞中发生失活的程度也较小。我们得出结论,嗜酸性粒细胞摄取大肠杆菌,但仅缓慢地穿孔(杀死)这些细菌,并且几乎不能使细菌酶失活。相比之下,中性粒细胞能快速摄取并穿孔(杀死)大肠杆菌,并迅速使细菌酶失活。