• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用神经网络模型预测肝移植候补者死亡率。

Use of neural network models to predict liver transplantation waitlist mortality.

机构信息

24016Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary SurgeryHenry Ford HospitalDetroitMichiganUSA.

Henry Ford Transplant InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2022 Jul;28(7):1133-1143. doi: 10.1002/lt.26442. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1002/lt.26442
PMID:35224855
Abstract

Current liver transplantation (LT) organ allocation relies on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium scores to predict mortality in patients awaiting LT. This study aims to develop neural network (NN) models that more accurately predict LT waitlist mortality. The study evaluates patients listed for LT between February 27, 2002, and June 30, 2021, using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry. We excluded patients listed with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception scores and those listed for multiorgan transplant, except for liver-kidney transplant. A subset of data from the waiting list was used to create a mortality prediction model at 90 days after listing with 105,140 patients. A total of 28 variables were selected for model creation. The data were split using random sampling into training, validation, and test data sets in a 60:20:20 ratio. The performance of the model was assessed using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR). AUC-ROC for 90-day mortality was 0.936 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.934-0.937), and AUC-PR was 0.758 (95% CI, 0.754-0.762). The NN 90-day mortality model outperformed MELD-based models for both AUC-ROC and AUC-PR. The 90-day mortality model specifically identified more waitlist deaths with a higher recall (sensitivity) of 0.807 (95% CI, 0.803-0.811) versus 0.413 (95% CI, 0.409-0.418; p < 0.001). The performance metrics were compared by breaking the test data set into multiple patient subsets by ethnicity, gender, region, age, diagnosis group, and year of listing. The NN 90-day mortality model outperformed MELD-based models across all subsets in predicting mortality. In conclusion, organ allocation based on NN modeling has the potential to decrease waitlist mortality and lead to more equitable allocation systems in LT.

摘要

目前,肝移植(LT)器官分配依赖于终末期肝病钠评分模型来预测等待 LT 的患者的死亡率。本研究旨在开发更准确预测 LT 候补名单死亡率的神经网络(NN)模型。该研究使用器官获取和移植网络/联合器官共享网络登记处评估了 2002 年 2 月 27 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间列入 LT 名单的患者。我们排除了使用终末期肝病模型(MELD)例外评分列入名单的患者和多器官移植患者(除肝-肾移植外)。从候补名单中抽取一部分数据,使用 105140 名患者在列入名单后 90 天创建死亡率预测模型。总共选择了 28 个变量用于模型创建。使用随机抽样将数据分为训练、验证和测试数据集,比例为 60:20:20。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)和精度-召回曲线下面积(AUC-PR)评估模型性能。90 天死亡率的 AUC-ROC 为 0.936(95%置信区间[CI],0.934-0.937),AUC-PR 为 0.758(95%CI,0.754-0.762)。NN 90 天死亡率模型在 AUC-ROC 和 AUC-PR 方面均优于基于 MELD 的模型。90 天死亡率模型特别确定了更多的候补名单死亡人数,召回率(敏感性)更高,为 0.807(95%CI,0.803-0.811),而不是 0.413(95%CI,0.409-0.418;p<0.001)。通过将测试数据集按种族、性别、地区、年龄、诊断组和列入名单年份划分为多个患者子集,比较了性能指标。NN 90 天死亡率模型在预测死亡率方面优于基于 MELD 的所有模型子集。总之,基于 NN 建模的器官分配有可能降低候补名单死亡率,并导致 LT 中更公平的分配系统。

相似文献

1
Use of neural network models to predict liver transplantation waitlist mortality.利用神经网络模型预测肝移植候补者死亡率。
Liver Transpl. 2022 Jul;28(7):1133-1143. doi: 10.1002/lt.26442. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease.等待肝移植患者的器官分配不平等:取消终末期肝病模型配型限制的理由。
J Hepatol. 2017 Sep;67(3):517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
Validating a novel score based on interaction between ACLF grade and MELD score to predict waitlist mortality.验证一种基于 ACLF 分级与 MELD 评分相互作用的新型评分,以预测等待移植患者的死亡率。
J Hepatol. 2021 Jun;74(6):1355-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
4
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.高 MELD 评分和严重肝性脑病的肝移植候选者的候补名单结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
The Addition of C-Reactive Protein and von Willebrand Factor to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Improves Prediction of Waitlist Mortality.C 反应蛋白和血管性血友病因子联合终末期肝病模型钠评分可改善等待移植患者死亡率预测。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1533-1545. doi: 10.1002/hep.31838. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
6
A Share 21 model in liver transplantation: Impact on waitlist outcomes.肝移植中的A Share 21模型:对等待名单结果的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Aug;20(8):2184-2197. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15836. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
7
Mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease above model for end-stage liver disease 3.0 of 40.终末期肝病模型 3.0 评分超过 40 分患者的死亡率。
Hepatology. 2023 Mar 1;77(3):851-861. doi: 10.1002/hep.32770. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
End-stage liver disease patients with MELD >40 have higher waitlist mortality compared to Status 1A patients.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分>40的终末期肝病患者与1A类患者相比,等待名单上的死亡率更高。
Hepatol Int. 2016 Sep;10(5):838-46. doi: 10.1007/s12072-016-9735-4. Epub 2016 May 24.
9
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease exception policy and outcomes in pediatric patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome requiring liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型/小儿终末期肝病例外政策和需要肝移植的肝肺综合征小儿患者的结局。
Liver Transpl. 2023 Feb 1;29(2):134-144. doi: 10.1002/lt.26548. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
10
Hepatic encephalopathy is associated with significantly increased mortality among patients awaiting liver transplantation.肝性脑病与等待肝移植患者的死亡率显著增加相关。
Liver Transpl. 2014 Dec;20(12):1454-61. doi: 10.1002/lt.23981.

引用本文的文献

1
Sarcopenia and frailty: An in-depth analysis of the pathophysiology and effect on liver transplant candidates.肌肉减少症与衰弱:对病理生理学及对肝移植候选者影响的深入分析。
World J Hepatol. 2025 May 27;17(5):106182. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.106182.
2
GraftIQ: Hybrid multi-class neural network integrating clinical insight for multi-outcome prediction in liver transplant recipients.移植智能量化(GraftIQ):整合临床见解的混合多类神经网络,用于肝移植受者的多结果预测。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 28;16(1):4943. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59610-8.
3
Machine learning in solid organ transplantation: Charting the evolving landscape.
实体器官移植中的机器学习:描绘不断演变的图景。
World J Transplant. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):99642. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.99642.
4
Advanced prognostic modeling with deep learning: assessing long-term outcomes in liver transplant recipients from deceased and living donors.基于深度学习的高级预后模型:评估已故和活体供肝肝移植受者的长期预后
J Transl Med. 2025 Feb 16;23(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06183-1.
5
Disparities in the Effects of Acuity Circle-based Liver Allocation on Waitlist and Transplant Practice Between Centers.基于视力圈的肝脏分配对各中心等待名单和移植实践影响的差异。
Transplant Direct. 2022 Sep 26;8(10):e1356. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001356. eCollection 2022 Oct.