Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2012 Feb 7;184(2):179-86. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111072. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
The ratio of percutaneous coronary interventions to coronary artery bypass graft surgeries (PCI:CABG ratio) varies considerably across hospitals. We conducted a comprehensive study to identify clinical and nonclinical factors associated with variations in the ratio across 17 cardiac centres in the province of Ontario.
In this retrospective cohort study, we selected a population-based sample of 8972 patients who underwent an index cardiac catheterization between April 2006 and March 2007 at any of 17 hospitals that perform invasive cardiac procedures in the province. We classified the hospitals into four groups by PCI:CABG ratio (low [< 2.0], low-medium [2.0-2.7], medium-high [2.8-3.2] and high [> 3.2]). We explored the relative contribution of patient, physician and hospital factors to variations in the likelihood of patients receiving PCI or CABG surgery within 90 days after the index catheterization.
The mean PCI:CABG ratio was 2.7 overall. We observed a threefold variation in the ratios across the four hospital ratio groups, from a mean of 1.6 in the lowest ratio group to a mean of 4.6 in the highest ratio group. Patients with single-vessel disease usually received PCI (88.4%-99.0%) and those with left main artery disease usually underwent CABG (80.8%-94.2%), regardless of the hospital's procedure ratio. Variation in the management of patients with non-emergent multivessel disease accounted for most of the variation in the ratios across hospitals. The mode of revascularization largely reflected the recommendation of the physician performing the diagnostic catheterization and was also influenced by the revascularization "culture" at the treating hospital.
The physician performing the diagnostic catheterization and the treating hospital were strong independent predictors of the mode of revascularization. Opportunities exist to improve transparency and consistency around the decision-making process for coronary revascularization, most notably among patients with non-emergent multivessel disease.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术(PCI:CABG 比率)在医院之间差异很大。我们进行了一项全面的研究,以确定与安大略省 17 个心脏中心之间该比率变化相关的临床和非临床因素。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们选择了一个基于人群的样本,该样本由 8972 名患者组成,他们于 2006 年 4 月至 2007 年 3 月期间在该省进行了任何一种侵入性心脏程序的 17 家医院中的任何一家进行了指数心脏导管插入术。我们根据 PCI:CABG 比率(低[<2.0]、低-中[2.0-2.7]、中-高[2.8-3.2]和高[>3.2])将医院分为四组。我们探讨了患者、医生和医院因素对指数导管插入术后 90 天内接受 PCI 或 CABG 手术的可能性的相对贡献。
总体而言,PCI:CABG 比率的平均值为 2.7。我们观察到四个医院比率组之间的比率存在三倍的差异,从最低比率组的平均 1.6 到最高比率组的平均 4.6。单支血管疾病患者通常接受 PCI(88.4%-99.0%),左主干疾病患者通常接受 CABG(80.8%-94.2%),无论医院的手术比率如何。非紧急多支血管疾病患者的管理变化是导致医院之间比率变化的主要原因。血运重建的方式主要反映了进行诊断性导管插入术的医生的建议,并且还受到治疗医院的血运重建“文化”的影响。
进行诊断性导管插入术的医生和治疗医院是血运重建方式的强有力独立预测因素。有机会改善冠状动脉血运重建决策过程的透明度和一致性,尤其是在非紧急多支血管疾病患者中。