Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2022 Apr;77(4):389-397. doi: 10.1111/anae.15672. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have reported anaesthetic outcomes in parturients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We reviewed the labour analgesic and anaesthetic interventions utilised in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients who had a confirmed positive test for SARS-CoV-2 across 10 hospitals in the north-west of England between 1 April 2020 and 31 May 2021. Primary outcomes analysed included the analgesic/anaesthetic technique utilised for labour and caesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of maternal characteristics, caesarean birth rate, maternal critical care admission rate along with adverse composite neonatal outcomes. A positive SARS-CoV-2 test was recorded in 836 parturients with 263 (31.4%) reported to have symptoms of COVID-19. Neuraxial labour analgesia was utilised in 104 (20.4%) of the 509 parturients who went on to have a vaginal birth. No differences in epidural analgesia rates were observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (OR 1.03, 95%CI 0.64-1.67; p = 0.90). The neuraxial anaesthesia rate in 310 parturients who underwent caesarean delivery was 94.2% (95%CI 90.6-96.0%). The rates of general anaesthesia were similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic parturients (6% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.52). Symptomatic parturients were more likely to be multiparous (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.19-2.22; p = 0.002); of Asian ethnicity (OR 1.54, 1.04-2.28; p = 0.03); to deliver prematurely (OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.47-3.19; p = 0.001); have a higher caesarean birth rate (44.5% vs. 33.7%; OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.16-2.12; p = 0.008); and a higher critical care utilisation rate both pre- (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) and post-delivery (11% vs. 3.5%; OR 3.43, 95%CI 1.83-6.52; p = 0.001). Eight neonates tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 while no differences in adverse composite neonatal outcomes were observed between those born to symptomatic and asymptomatic mothers (25.8% vs. 23.8%; OR 1.11, 95%CI 0.78-1.57; p = 0.55). In women with COVID-19, non-neuraxial analgesic regimens were commonly utilised for labour while neuraxial anaesthesia was employed for the majority of caesarean births. Symptomatic women with COVID-19 are at increased risk of significant maternal morbidity including preterm birth, caesarean birth and peripartum critical care admission.
自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来,很少有研究报告 SARS-CoV-2 感染产妇的麻醉结果。我们回顾了 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日期间英格兰西北部 10 家医院确诊 SARS-CoV-2 阳性的症状性和无症状产妇在分娩和剖宫产中使用的镇痛和麻醉干预措施。主要分析结果包括用于分娩和剖宫产的镇痛/麻醉技术。次要结果包括比较产妇特征、剖宫产率、产妇重症监护入院率以及不良复合新生儿结局。836 名产妇中记录了 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性,其中 263 名(31.4%)报告有 COVID-19 症状。在 509 名进行阴道分娩的产妇中,104 名(20.4%)接受了椎管内分娩镇痛。症状性和无症状产妇的硬膜外镇痛率无差异(OR 1.03,95%CI 0.64-1.67;p=0.90)。310 名接受剖宫产的产妇中,94.2%(95%CI 90.6-96.0%)接受了椎管内麻醉。症状性和无症状产妇全身麻醉率相似(6%比 5.7%;p=0.52)。症状性产妇更有可能是经产妇(OR 1.64,95%CI 1.19-2.22;p=0.002);是亚洲裔(OR 1.54,95%CI 1.04-2.28;p=0.03);早产(OR 2.16,95%CI 1.47-3.19;p=0.001);剖宫产率较高(44.5%比 33.7%;OR 1.57,95%CI 1.16-2.12;p=0.008);和更高的重症监护使用率,包括产前(8%比 0%,p=0.001)和产后(11%比 3.5%;OR 3.43,95%CI 1.83-6.52;p=0.001)。有 8 名新生儿 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性,但无症状和有症状母亲的新生儿不良复合结局无差异(25.8%比 23.8%;OR 1.11,95%CI 0.78-1.57;p=0.55)。在 COVID-19 产妇中,非神经轴麻醉方案常用于分娩,而神经轴麻醉用于大多数剖宫产。有 COVID-19 症状的产妇发生严重产妇发病率的风险增加,包括早产、剖宫产和围产期重症监护入院。