Suppr超能文献

评估提供者文件记录模式,作为提供持续以患者为中心的糖尿病教育和支持的工具。

Evaluation of provider documentation patterns as a tool to deliver ongoing patient-centred diabetes education and support.

机构信息

University of Missouri Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;74(3):e13451. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13451. Epub 2019 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world. As a disease with long-term complications requiring changes in management, DM requires not only education at the time of diagnosis, but ongoing diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S). In the United States, however, only a small proportion of people with DM receive DSME/S, although evidence supports benefits of ongoing DSME/S. The diabetes education that providers deliver during follow-up visits may be an important source for DSME/S for many people with DM.

METHODS

We collected 200 clinic notes of follow-up visits for 100 adults with DM and studied the History of Present Illness (HPI) and Impression and Plan (I&P) sections. Using a codebook based on the seven principles of American Association of Diabetes Educators Self-Care Behaviors (AADE7), we conducted a multi-step deductive thematic analysis to determine the patterns of DSME/S information occurrence in clinic notes. Additionally, we used the generalised linear mixed models for investigating whether providers delivered DSME/S to people with DM based on patient characteristics.

RESULTS

During follow-up visits, Monitoring was the most common self-care behaviour mentioned in both HPI and I&P sections. Being Active was the least common self-care behaviour mentioned in the HPI section and Healthy Coping was the least common self-care behaviour mentioned in the I&P section. We found providers delivered more information on Healthy Eating to men compared to women in I&P section. Generally, providers delivered DSME/S to people with DM regardless of patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study focused on the frequency distribution of information providers delivered to the people with DM during follow-up clinic visits based on the AADE7. The results may indicate a lack of patient-centred education when people with DM visit providers for ongoing management. Further studies are needed to identify the underlying reasons why providers have difficulty delivering patient-centred education.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)是世界上最常见的慢性疾病之一。由于这种疾病需要长期管理并伴有并发症,因此不仅在诊断时需要进行教育,还需要持续的糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSME/S)。然而,尽管有证据表明持续的 DSME/S 有益,但在美国,只有一小部分 DM 患者接受了 DSME/S。在许多 DM 患者中,医生在随访期间提供的糖尿病教育可能是 DSME/S 的重要来源。

方法

我们收集了 100 名成年 DM 患者的 200 份随访诊所记录,并研究了现病史(HPI)和印象与计划(I&P)部分。我们使用基于美国糖尿病教育者协会自我护理行为七项原则(AADE7)的代码本,进行了多步演绎主题分析,以确定诊所记录中 DSME/S 信息出现的模式。此外,我们还使用广义线性混合模型来调查提供者是否根据患者特征向 DM 患者提供 DSME/S。

结果

在随访期间,监测是 HPI 和 I&P 部分中最常提到的自我护理行为。活跃是 HPI 部分中最不常提到的自我护理行为,而健康应对是 I&P 部分中最不常提到的自我护理行为。我们发现,在 I&P 部分,提供者向男性提供的关于健康饮食的信息多于女性。一般来说,提供者会向 DM 患者提供 DSME/S,无论患者特征如何。

结论

本研究根据 AADE7 重点研究了提供者在随访诊所就诊期间向 DM 患者提供信息的频率分布。这些结果可能表明,当 DM 患者因持续管理而就诊时,缺乏以患者为中心的教育。需要进一步研究以确定提供者在提供以患者为中心的教育方面存在困难的根本原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f8/7047595/7e0385c94fb0/nihms-1061158-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Telehealth Technologies in Diabetes Self-management and Education.糖尿病自我管理与教育中的远程医疗技术
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):148-158. doi: 10.1177/19322968221093078. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

2
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S61-S70. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S006.
3
Introduction: .引言:.
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S1-S2. doi: 10.2337/dc19-Sint01.
8
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.为初级保健提供者缩写。
Clin Diabetes. 2017 Jan;35(1):5-26. doi: 10.2337/cd16-0067.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验