Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜异位症诊断工具的优势与局限性及其在诊断试验准确性研究中的相关性。

Strengths and limitations of diagnostic tools for endometriosis and relevance in diagnostic test accuracy research.

作者信息

Pascoal E, Wessels J M, Aas-Eng M K, Abrao M S, Condous G, Jurkovic D, Espada M, Exacoustos C, Ferrero S, Guerriero S, Hudelist G, Malzoni M, Reid S, Tang S, Tomassetti C, Singh S S, Van den Bosch T, Leonardi M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

AIMA Laboratories Inc., Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;60(3):309-327. doi: 10.1002/uog.24892.

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease that can cause pain, infertility and reduced quality of life. Diagnosing endometriosis remains challenging, which yields diagnostic delays for patients. Research on diagnostic test accuracy in endometriosis can be difficult due to verification bias, as not all patients with endometriosis undergo definitive diagnostic testing. The purpose of this State-of-the-Art Review is to provide a comprehensive update on the strengths and limitations of the diagnostic modalities used in endometriosis and discuss the relevance of diagnostic test accuracy research pertaining to each. We performed a comprehensive literature review of the following methods: clinical assessment including history and physical examination, biomarkers, diagnostic imaging, surgical diagnosis and histopathology. Our review suggests that, although non-invasive diagnostic methods, such as clinical assessment, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, do not yet qualify formally as replacement tests for surgery in diagnosing all subtypes of endometriosis, they are likely to be appropriate for advanced stages of endometriosis. We also demonstrate in our review that all methods have strengths and limitations, leading to our conclusion that there should not be a single gold-standard diagnostic method for endometriosis, but rather, multiple accepted diagnostic methods appropriate for different circumstances. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

子宫内膜异位症是一种慢性全身性疾病,可导致疼痛、不孕并降低生活质量。子宫内膜异位症的诊断仍然具有挑战性,这会导致患者诊断延迟。由于存在验证偏倚,子宫内膜异位症诊断试验准确性的研究可能会很困难,因为并非所有子宫内膜异位症患者都接受确定性诊断检测。本前沿综述的目的是全面更新子宫内膜异位症诊断方法的优势和局限性,并讨论每项诊断试验准确性研究的相关性。我们对以下方法进行了全面的文献综述:临床评估(包括病史和体格检查)、生物标志物、诊断成像、手术诊断和组织病理学。我们的综述表明,尽管临床评估、超声和磁共振成像等非侵入性诊断方法尚未正式成为诊断所有子宫内膜异位症亚型的手术替代检测方法,但它们可能适用于子宫内膜异位症的晚期。我们在综述中还表明,所有方法都有优势和局限性,由此得出结论:子宫内膜异位症不应有单一的金标准诊断方法,而应有多种适用于不同情况的公认诊断方法。© 2022国际妇产科超声学会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验