• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道路交通噪声对欧洲城市烦恼和可预防死亡率的影响:健康影响评估。

Impact of road traffic noise on annoyance and preventable mortality in European cities: A health impact assessment.

机构信息

Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.

Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; PHAGEX Research Group, Blanquerna School of Health Science, Universitat Ramon Llull (URL), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2022 Apr;162:107160. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107160. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107160
PMID:35231841
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Road traffic is the main source of environmental noise in European cities and one of the main environmental risks to health and wellbeing. In this study we aimed to provide an in-depth assessment of available road traffic noise data and to estimate population exposure and health impacts for cities in Europe.

METHODS

We conducted the analysis for 724 cities and 25 greater cities in 25 European countries. We retrieved road traffic strategic noise maps delivered under the Environmental Noise Directive (END) or available from local sources. We assessed noise exposure using the 24 h day-evening-night noise level indicator (L) starting at exposure levels of 55 dB L - based on data availability - for the adult population aged 20 and over (n = 123,966,346). For the adults exposed to noise levels above 55 dB L we estimated the health impacts of compliance with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation of 53 dB L. Two primary health outcomes were assessed: high noise annoyance and Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD), using mortality from IHD causes as indicator. Exposure Response Functions (ERFs) relating road traffic noise exposure to annoyance and IHD mortality were retrieved from the literature. Uncertainties in input parameters were propagated using Monte Carlo simulations to obtain point estimates and empirical 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). Lastly, the noise maps were categorized as high, moderate and low quality following a qualitative approach.

RESULTS

Strategic noise map data was delivered in three distinct formats (i.e. raster, polygon or polyline) and had distinct noise ranges and levels of categorization. The majority of noise maps (i.e. 83.2%) were considered of moderate or low quality. Based on the data provided, almost 60 million adults were exposed to road traffic noise levels above 55 dB L, equating to a median of 42% (Interquartile Range (IQR): 31.8-64.8) of the adult population across the analysed cities. We estimated that approximately 11 million adults were highly annoyed by road traffic noise and that 3608 deaths from IHD (95% CI: 843-6266) could be prevented annually with compliance of the WHO recommendation. The proportion of highly annoyed adults by city had a median value of 7.6% (IQR: 5.6-11.8) across the analysed cities, while the number preventable deaths had a median of 2.2 deaths per 100,000 population (IQR: 1.4-3.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the provided strategic noise maps a considerable number of adults in European cities are exposed to road traffic noise levels harmful for health. Efforts to standardize the strategic noise maps and to increase noise and disease data availability at the city level are needed. These would allow for a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of the health impacts and further help local governments to address the adverse health effects of road traffic noise.

摘要

背景

道路交通是欧洲城市环境噪声的主要来源,也是对健康和福祉的主要环境风险之一。在这项研究中,我们旨在深入评估现有的道路交通噪声数据,并估计欧洲城市的人口暴露和健康影响。

方法

我们对 25 个欧洲国家的 724 个城市和 25 个大都市区进行了分析。我们检索了根据《环境噪声指令》(END)提供或从当地来源获得的道路交通战略噪声图。我们使用 24 小时白天-傍晚-夜间噪声水平指标(L)评估噪声暴露情况,从暴露水平为 55dB L 开始(基于数据可用性),针对 20 岁及以上的成年人口(n=123966346)。对于暴露于 55dB L 以上噪声水平的成年人,我们估计了遵守世界卫生组织(WHO)53dB L 建议的健康影响。评估了两种主要的健康结果:高噪声烦恼和缺血性心脏病(IHD),使用 IHD 死亡率作为指标。我们从文献中检索了与道路交通噪声暴露相关的噪声烦恼和 IHD 死亡率的暴露反应函数(ERFs)。使用蒙特卡罗模拟传播输入参数的不确定性,以获得点估计值和经验 95%置信区间(CI)。最后,根据定性方法将噪声图分为高质量、中质量和低质量。

结果

战略噪声图数据以三种不同的格式(即栅格、多边形或折线)提供,具有不同的噪声范围和分类水平。大多数噪声图(即 83.2%)被认为是中质量或低质量的。根据提供的数据,近 6000 万成年人暴露于 55dB L 以上的道路交通噪声水平,相当于分析城市中成年人口的中位数为 42%(四分位距(IQR):31.8-64.8)。我们估计,大约有 1100 万成年人因道路交通噪声而感到非常烦恼,每年可预防 3608 例缺血性心脏病死亡(95%CI:843-6266)。分析城市中,受道路交通噪声影响的高度烦恼成年人比例中位数为 7.6%(IQR:5.6-11.8),而可预防的死亡人数中位数为每 10 万人中有 2.2 人死亡(IQR:1.4-3.1)。

结论

根据提供的战略噪声图,欧洲城市中有相当数量的成年人暴露于对健康有害的道路交通噪声水平。需要努力标准化战略噪声图,并增加城市层面的噪声和疾病数据可用性。这将允许更准确和全面地评估健康影响,并进一步帮助地方政府解决道路交通噪声对健康的不利影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of road traffic noise on annoyance and preventable mortality in European cities: A health impact assessment.道路交通噪声对欧洲城市烦恼和可预防死亡率的影响:健康影响评估。
Environ Int. 2022 Apr;162:107160. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107160. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
2
Health impact assessment of road traffic noise exposure based on different densification scenarios in Malmö, Sweden.基于瑞典马尔默不同致密化情景的道路交通噪声暴露对健康的影响评估。
Environ Int. 2023 Apr;174:107867. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107867. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
3
Incidence of depression in relation to transportation noise exposure and noise annoyance in the SAPALDIA study.在SAPALDIA研究中,抑郁症发病率与交通噪声暴露及噪声烦恼的关系。
Environ Int. 2020 Nov;144:106014. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106014. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Health impact assessment of transportation noise in two Estonian cities.爱沙尼亚两个城市交通噪声对健康的影响评估。
Environ Res. 2022 Mar;204(Pt C):112319. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112319. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
Spatial assessment of the attributable burden of disease due to transportation noise in England.英格兰因交通噪声导致的可归因疾病负担的空间评估。
Environ Int. 2023 Aug;178:107966. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107966. Epub 2023 May 13.
6
A statistical downscaling approach for generating high spatial resolution health risk maps: a case study of road noise and ischemic heart disease mortality in Melbourne, Australia.一种生成高空间分辨率健康风险图的统计降尺度方法:以澳大利亚墨尔本的道路噪声和缺血性心脏病死亡率为例。
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 Sep 5;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0184-x.
7
Quantification of the exposure and effects of road traffic noise in a dense Asian city: a comparison with western cities.亚洲一个人口密集城市道路交通噪声暴露与影响的量化:与西方城市的比较。
Environ Health. 2015 Mar 7;14:22. doi: 10.1186/s12940-015-0009-8.
8
Road traffic noise and annoyance: a quantification of the effect of quiet side exposure at dwellings.道路交通噪声和烦恼:居住环境中安静侧面暴露的影响量化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jun 3;10(6):2258-70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10062258.
9
Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity, noise annoyance, psychological and physical health and mortality.道路交通噪声、噪声敏感性、噪声烦恼、心理和身体健康以及死亡率。
Environ Health. 2021 Mar 25;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00720-3.
10
Annoyance from Road Traffic, Trains, Airplanes and from Total Environmental Noise Levels.道路交通、火车、飞机及总体环境噪音水平引起的烦恼。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 29;13(1):90. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010090.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of potential health impacts of road and rail traffic noise, using noise at residential locations in Austria as an example.以奥地利居民点的噪声为例,分析道路和铁路交通噪声对健康的潜在影响。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s00508-025-02609-4.
2
Tackling noise pollution in climate adaptation and mitigation: planetary health benefits towards a net-zero future.应对气候适应与缓解中的噪音污染:实现净零未来对地球健康的益处。
Oxf Open Clim Chang. 2025 Aug 20;5(1):kgaf021. doi: 10.1093/oxfclm/kgaf021. eCollection 2025.
3
Human exposure to harmful urban traffic noise pollution levels: a case study from seoul, South Korea.
人类暴露于有害的城市交通噪音污染水平:韩国首尔的一个案例研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28610. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14277-5.
4
A computational framework for agent-based assessment of multiple environmental exposures.基于主体的多种环境暴露评估的计算框架。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 2. doi: 10.1038/s41370-025-00799-7.
5
The environmental health citizen interview tool: towards an inclusive qualitative environmental wellbeing approach in support of planetary health.环境卫生公民访谈工具:迈向支持地球健康的包容性定性环境福祉方法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;12:1462561. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1462561. eCollection 2024.
6
Commentary: A road map for future data-driven urban planning and environmental health research.评论:未来数据驱动的城市规划与环境卫生研究路线图。
Cities. 2024 Dec;155:105340. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105340.
7
Correlation between Long-Term Exposure to Traffic Noise and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.长期暴露于交通噪声与 2 型糖尿病风险的相关性。
Noise Health. 2024;26(121):153-157. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_36_23. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
8
Technology-forcing to reduce environmental noise pollution: a prospectus.强制使用技术以减少环境噪声污染:一份计划书。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):6-15. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00679-6. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
9
Exploring the nexus of urban form, transport, environment and health in large-scale urban studies: A state-of-the-art scoping review.探索大规模城市研究中城市形态、交通、环境和健康的关系:现状述评。
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 15;257:119324. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119324. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
10
Advancing Health Equity through 15-min Cities and Chrono-urbanism.通过 15 分钟城市和时间城市主义实现健康公平。
J Urban Health. 2024 Jun;101(3):483-496. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00850-2. Epub 2024 May 14.