Kim Nam-Gun, Geum Sun Woo, Lee Won Young, Noh Seungkeun, Jang Mi Hee, Hong Ju-Hee, Jung Jongsoon, Kwon Seung-Mi, Choi Jinhee
Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment, Seoul, Korea.
School of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28610. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14277-5.
Among the various forms of environmental noise pollution in urban areas, road traffic noise (RTN) is the most dominant source, with it increasing the risk of various diseases such as stroke, heart disease, and diabetes. Considering these risks, this study aims to evaluate RTN levels across four monitoring sites classified by urban neighborhood categories, compare them with WHO-recommended thresholds, and analyze potential adverse health effects. We conducted a cross-sectional study by selecting residential areas, commercial areas, and industrial areas as the study sites, dividing them into areas with large populations and high traffic volumes according to land use types. We used WHO guidelines for no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for myocardial infarction (MI), for nighttime and the whole day (L), published in 2009 and 2018, and compared them to RTN measurement data from January to December 2022 collected at the four monitoring sites. Noise levels at the four study sites exceeded the three thresholds set by the WHO based on the exposure-response relationship between RTN and cardiovascular disease: the daytime and nighttime NOAEL values of 60 dB(A) and 50 dB(A), the nighttime threshold of 45 dB(A), and the overall L threshold of 53 dB(A). Furthermore, the degree of exceeding the standard value was higher in commercial and industrial areas than in residential areas. Given these detailed analyses, the high proportion of the population exposed to harmful RTN contamination warrants substantial investigation and policy-maker action on the potential risks, taking into account regional characteristics.
在城市地区的各种环境噪声污染形式中,道路交通噪声(RTN)是最主要的来源,它会增加患中风、心脏病和糖尿病等各种疾病的风险。考虑到这些风险,本研究旨在评估按城市邻里类别划分的四个监测点的道路交通噪声水平,将其与世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的阈值进行比较,并分析潜在的不良健康影响。我们通过选择居民区、商业区和工业区作为研究地点进行了一项横断面研究,根据土地利用类型将它们划分为人口众多和交通流量大的区域。我们使用了WHO于2009年和2018年发布的关于心肌梗死(MI)的未观察到有害作用水平(NOAEL)的夜间和全天(L)指南,并将其与2022年1月至12月在四个监测点收集的道路交通噪声测量数据进行比较。四个研究地点的噪声水平超过了WHO根据道路交通噪声与心血管疾病之间的暴露-反应关系设定的三个阈值:白天和夜间的NOAEL值分别为60分贝(A)和50分贝(A)、夜间阈值45分贝(A)以及总体L阈值53分贝(A)。此外,商业区和工业区超过标准值的程度高于居民区。鉴于这些详细分析,考虑到区域特征,大量暴露于有害道路交通噪声污染中的人口比例值得对潜在风险进行深入调查并采取政策制定者行动。