Suppr超能文献

建立组织准备度:基于专家意见的实施策略类型学的初步现场测试

Building organizational readiness: initial field testing of an expert-informed typology of implementation strategies.

作者信息

Vax Sigal, Farkas Marianne, Mueser Kim T, Drainoni Mari-Lynn, Russinova Zlatka

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Program, College of Health & Rehabilitation: Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, USA.

Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, College of Health & Rehabilitation: Sargent College, Boston University, 940 Commonwealth Ave W, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Mar 2;3(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00257-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organizational readiness is a known barrier to implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) in community mental health services. A robust methodology for enhancing organizational readiness for implementation (ORI) has the potential to improve implementation outcomes of EBPs and ensure better services for people with a psychiatric disability. Prior work established a framework of implementation strategies targeting ORI enhancement by asking a group of implementation experts from various fields to categorize strategies from the "Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change" (ERIC) Project into three readiness stages, consistent with the pre-action stages of the Transtheoretical Model of behavioral change: Pre-contemplation, Contemplation, and Preparation. The current study provides initial confirmation and refinement to this expert-driven typology based on community mental health field experiences.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with stakeholders involved in a recent EBP implementation project. Participants included staff (n=9) from four community mental health agencies and the implementation team who facilitated the project (n=3). Their pre-implementation experiences were compared with the experts' typology to identify consistencies and discrepancies.

RESULTS

The participants' experiences were congruent with two thirds of the strategies identified by the experts for specific ORI stages. The refinements included 12 strategies used in additional stages beyond the experts' classification, four strategies from the ERIC list that were not included in the ORI typology, and five new strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides initial confirmation and refinements to the previously published ORI typology. The results offer guidance as to how ORI could be enhanced in the community mental health field.

摘要

背景

组织准备情况是社区心理健康服务中实施循证实践(EBPs)的一个已知障碍。一种强大的增强组织实施准备度(ORI)的方法有潜力改善循证实践的实施效果,并确保为有精神疾病的人提供更好的服务。先前的工作建立了一个实施策略框架,旨在通过让一群来自不同领域的实施专家将“实施变革专家建议”(ERIC)项目中的策略分类为三个准备阶段,来增强组织实施准备度,这与行为改变的跨理论模型的行动前阶段一致:未考虑、考虑和准备。本研究基于社区心理健康领域的经验,对这种由专家驱动的类型学进行了初步确认和完善。

方法

我们对参与最近一个循证实践实施项目的利益相关者进行了深入访谈。参与者包括来自四个社区心理健康机构的工作人员(n = 9)和推动该项目的实施团队(n = 3)。将他们实施前的经验与专家的类型学进行比较,以确定一致性和差异。

结果

参与者的经验与专家为特定组织实施准备度阶段确定的三分之二的策略一致。完善内容包括在专家分类之外的其他阶段使用的12种策略、ERIC列表中未包含在组织实施准备度类型学中的4种策略以及5种新策略。

结论

本研究对先前发表的组织实施准备度类型学进行了初步确认和完善。研究结果为如何在社区心理健康领域增强组织实施准备度提供了指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a685/8889672/f555dd0a6db5/43058_2022_257_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验