Perera Suraj, Leyland Nathalie, Coshever Jonathan
Avon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, UK.
Severn Deanery, UK.
BJPsych Bull. 2023 Jun;47(3):127-132. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2022.10.
To gain an understanding of court orders for reports under section 49 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in terms of the incidence, topics instructed, time taken, impact on working practice and well-being, and support available to psychiatrists. We used Microsoft Forms to generate an online survey. Domains within the survey included demographics, number of reports, support, clinical impact and personal well-being.
Of the 104 psychiatrists who responded, 65.4% had been ordered to undertake a section 49 report; 51.5% of those had been asked to provide an opinion outside their subjective expertise, 25% were somewhat or fully confident in writing reports and 85% stated that they experienced stress as a result.
There is a need for national and local regulation of the process of ordering reports under section 49, and for psychiatrists to be trained and supported by their employers.
为了从发生率、所要求的主题、所需时间、对工作实践和幸福感的影响以及精神科医生可获得的支持等方面,了解依据2005年《精神能力法》第49条下达的报告法庭指令。我们使用微软表单生成了一项在线调查。调查中的领域包括人口统计学信息、报告数量、支持情况、临床影响和个人幸福感。
在回复的104名精神科医生中,65.4%曾接到下达第49条报告的指令;其中51.5%被要求提供超出其主观专业领域的意见,25%对撰写报告有些许信心或完全有信心,85%表示因此经历了压力。
需要对依据第49条下达报告的流程进行国家和地方层面的监管,并且精神科医生需要接受雇主的培训和支持。