Carpendale Emma J, Cullen Alexis E, Dickson Hannah, Laurens Kristin R
Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Psychology and Counselling, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
King's College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2022 Feb 9;28:100239. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2022.100239. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Poor verbal learning and memory function is well-documented among individuals with schizophrenia and those at clinical high-risk for psychosis. This study aimed to identify these impairments among children aged 9-12 years with different schizophrenia risk profiles (family history or antecedents of schizophrenia, each of higher or lower risk load) relative to typically developing peers. These three groups were recruited via community-screening, and differentiated for analysis into: typically developing children (TD = 45); children who had 1 first- or ≥2 second-degree affected relatives (FHx = 16) or one second-degree relative (FHx = 15); and children presenting multiple replicated antecedents of schizophrenia whose clinical symptoms persisted at 2- and/or 4-year follow-up (ASz = 16) or remitted during follow-up (ASz = 16). Verbal learning/memory measures assessed at baseline (age 9-12 years) included: (i) total recall; (ii) trial 1 recall; (iii) learning score; (iv) intrusions; (v) total words lost; and (vi) serial position patterns. Analyses of variance indicated that FHx and ASz youth demonstrated impaired total recall compared to TD and ASz children and lost significantly more words between trials than TD and FHx children. Learning score was impaired among both FHx and FHx relative to TD and ASz children. Thus, among putatively at-risk children, total words recalled and lost distinguished those with higher risk load (by family history or persistent antecedent symptomology), whereas learning score indexed familial vulnerability. Follow-up of the sample is needed to determine the capacity of verbal learning deficits to predict later illness and provide a potential avenue for early remediation to improve clinical or functional outcomes.
精神分裂症患者以及临床高危精神病患者存在明显的语言学习和记忆功能缺陷。本研究旨在确定9至12岁具有不同精神分裂症风险特征(精神分裂症家族史或前驱症状,高风险或低风险负荷)的儿童与正常发育儿童相比是否存在这些缺陷。这三组儿童通过社区筛查招募,并分为以下三组进行分析:正常发育儿童(TD = 45);有1名一级或≥2名二级亲属患病的儿童(FHx = 16)或有1名二级亲属患病的儿童(FHx = 15);以及出现多次重复精神分裂症前驱症状且临床症状在2年和/或4年随访时持续存在(ASz = 16)或在随访期间缓解(ASz = 16)的儿童。在基线(9至12岁)评估的语言学习/记忆指标包括:(i)总回忆量;(ii)首次试验回忆量;(iii)学习分数;(iv)错误回忆;(v)总遗忘单词数;以及(vi)序列位置模式。方差分析表明,与TD儿童和ASz儿童相比,FHx组和ASz组青少年的总回忆量受损,并且在各试验之间遗忘的单词数明显多于TD儿童和FHx儿童。与TD儿童和ASz儿童相比,FHx组和ASz组的学习分数均受损。因此,在假定有风险的儿童中,总回忆和遗忘的单词数区分了具有较高风险负荷(通过家族史或持续的前驱症状)的儿童,而学习分数则反映了家族易感性。需要对样本进行随访,以确定语言学习缺陷预测后期疾病的能力,并为早期干预提供潜在途径,以改善临床或功能结局。