Campbell R, MacFarlane A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jul;93(7):675-83.
Policies about place of delivery have tended to be formulated without either looking at existing evidence or doing new research into the relative safety for women and babies of delivery in different settings. This article reviews published research on the subject, and finds that many of the data required have not been collected. Furthermore, many analyses fail to take account of selection biases or differences in the birthweight distribution and the incidence of congenital malformations among babies born in different settings. Nevertheless, some tentative conclusions can be drawn. The available evidence does not support claims that, for the baby, the iatrogenic risks of obstetric intervention outweigh the possible benefits. At the same time, there is no evidence to support the claim that the shift to hospital delivery is responsible for the decline in perinatal mortality in England and Wales nor the claim that the safest policy is for all women to be delivered in hospital.
关于分娩地点的政策往往在未参考现有证据或未针对不同环境下分娩对母婴的相对安全性开展新研究的情况下就已制定。本文回顾了关于该主题的已发表研究,发现所需的许多数据尚未收集。此外,许多分析未考虑到选择偏倚或不同环境下出生婴儿的出生体重分布差异以及先天性畸形发生率。然而,仍可得出一些初步结论。现有证据并不支持以下说法:对于婴儿而言,产科干预的医源性风险超过了可能的益处。同时,没有证据支持以下说法:向医院分娩的转变是英格兰和威尔士围产期死亡率下降的原因,也没有证据支持最安全的政策是让所有妇女都在医院分娩这一说法。