• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩前胎儿头部:精确测量,使用数学外推的额枕径。

Fetal head prior to delivery: precise measurement, using a mathematically extrapolated frontooccipital diameter.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spitäler Schaffhausen, Schaffhausen, Switzerland.

Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;306(6):1923-1928. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06489-1. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-022-06489-1
PMID:35246716
Abstract

PURPOSE

To find a method that could improve the accuracy of fHC evaluation at term.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was based on data from the University Hospital of Zürich (USZ). Study population included singleton fetuses and newborns at term between 2015 and 2017. Fetal biometry was performed within 1 week prior to delivery. Study data consisted of two cohorts with 200 ultrasound measurements each: 200 performed by an expert, 200 by residents. fHC were compared with the newborn's head circumference (nHC). fHC was estimated using two methods: (1) fHC based on sonographically estimated frontooccipital diameter (FOD) and biparietal diameter (BPD). (2) Expected FOD was calculated as a fixed mean FOD/BPD relation, derived from biometry standards as the 50th percentile. If BPD was < 99 mm, FOD was calculated according to the formula BPD × 1.268557, If BPD was ≥ 99 mm, FOD was calculated according to the formula BPD × 1.20641443.

RESULTS

fHC was underestimated compared with nHC in the expert group: percentage error (PE =  - 3.68%, SD = 2.79), as well as in the group of residents (PE =  - 3.78%, SD = 3.20) using method 1. fHC measurement was significantly more accurate using method 2. In the expert group PE =  - 1.17%, SD = 3.08, in the group of residents PE =  - 0.95%, SD = 3.33. Bland-Altman analysis showed limits of agreement (LOA) between - 2.41338 and 0.5537828 cm for fHC.

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of fHC estimation could be improved by extrapolation of FOD when real-time FOD cannot be measured.

摘要

目的

寻找一种能够提高足月时胎儿头围(fetal head circumference,fHC)评估准确性的方法。

材料与方法

本回顾性队列研究基于苏黎世大学医院(University Hospital of Zürich,USZ)的数据。研究人群包括 2015 年至 2017 年间足月的单胎胎儿和新生儿。胎儿生物测量在分娩前 1 周内进行。研究数据包括两个队列,每个队列有 200 次超声测量:由专家进行的 200 次测量,由住院医师进行的 200 次测量。fHC 与新生儿头围(nHC)进行比较。fHC 采用两种方法进行估计:(1)基于超声估计的额枕径(frontooccipital diameter,FOD)和双顶间径(biparietal diameter,BPD)的 fHC。(2)预期 FOD 是根据作为第 50 百分位数的生物测量标准得出的固定平均 FOD/BPD 关系计算得出。如果 BPD<99mm,则根据公式 BPD×1.268557 计算 FOD;如果 BPD≥99mm,则根据公式 BPD×1.20641443 计算 FOD。

结果

与专家组的 nHC 相比,使用方法 1 时,fHC 低估了 nHC(百分比误差[percentage error,PE] =-3.68%,标准差[standard deviation,SD]=2.79%),在住院医师组中也是如此(PE=-3.78%,SD=3.20%)。使用方法 2 时,fHC 测量更准确。在专家组中,PE=-1.17%,SD=3.08%,在住院医师组中,PE=-0.95%,SD=3.33%。Bland-Altman 分析显示 fHC 的 LOA 为-2.41338 至 0.5537828cm。

结论

通过实时无法测量 FOD 时的 FOD 外推,可以提高 fHC 估计的准确性。

相似文献

1
Fetal head prior to delivery: precise measurement, using a mathematically extrapolated frontooccipital diameter.分娩前胎儿头部:精确测量,使用数学外推的额枕径。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;306(6):1923-1928. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06489-1. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.寻找用于胎儿体重估计的最准确的头围测量方法。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jul;178:153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.047. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
3
Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.单胎及多胎胎儿生物测量用于检测早产及足月的小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿:一项纵向队列研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0164161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164161. eCollection 2016.
4
Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.妊娠11至14周时的经腹胎儿生物测量
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;20(6):564-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00842.x.
5
Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border.边境难民营中当地卫生工作者进行的产科超声扫描。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;34(4):395-403. doi: 10.1002/uog.7350.
6
Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study.胎儿双肩胛骨径及衍生超声参数预测肩难产的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 9;19(9):5747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095747.
7
Accuracy of automated three-dimensional ultrasound imaging technique for fetal head biometry.自动化三维超声成像技术在胎儿头部生物测量中的准确性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;57(5):798-803. doi: 10.1002/uog.22171.
8
Discrepancy in fetal head biometry between ultrasound and MRI in suspected microcephalic fetuses.疑似小头畸形胎儿中超声与磁共振成像测量胎儿头部生物指标的差异
Acta Radiol. 2017 Dec;58(12):1519-1527. doi: 10.1177/0284185117698865. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区医护人员进行的超声胎儿生物测量的测量误差。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;34(4):387-94. doi: 10.1002/uog.6385.
10
Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.股骨长度的纳入会导致不对称性早产生长受限胎儿体重的低估。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;35(4):442-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.7605.

本文引用的文献

1
SECULAR CHANGES IN BIRTH WEIGHTS AND WOMEN'S BODY SIZE IN KRAKÓW AND POZNAŃ (POLAND) DURING THE LAST CENTURY.上个世纪波兰克拉科夫和波兹南地区出生体重及女性体型的长期变化
J Biosoc Sci. 2017 May;49(3):380-391. doi: 10.1017/S0021932016000316. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
2
Association between sonographic measurement of fetal head circumference and labor outcome.胎儿头围超声测量与分娩结局之间的关联。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;132(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.043. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.
寻找用于胎儿体重估计的最准确的头围测量方法。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jul;178:153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.047. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
4
Sonographic estimation of fetal head circumference: how accurate are we?超声估计胎儿头围:我们有多准确?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):65-71. doi: 10.1002/uog.7760.
5
Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia.脐带横截面积大作为巨大儿的预测指标
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;30(6):861-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.5183.
6
Third-trimester ultrasound dating algorithms derived from pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.源自通过人工生殖技术受孕的妊娠的孕晚期超声预产期计算算法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;26(2):129-31. doi: 10.1002/uog.1939.
7
Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk.美国的巨大儿出生:决定因素、结局及建议的风险分级
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1372-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.302.
8
[Secular changes in anthropometrical variables at birth: a local perspective].
Rev Med Chil. 2002 Oct;130(10):1095-100.
9
Fetal ultrasound biometry: 1. Head reference values.胎儿超声生物测量:1. 头部参考值。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Feb;106(2):126-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08212.x.
10
Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements.胎儿大小图表:2. 头部测量值。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Jan;101(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13007.x.