Sales Lilian P, Galetti Mauro, Carnaval Ana, Monsarrat Sophie, Svenning Jens-Christian, Pires Mathias M
Department of Animal Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jun;28(11):3683-3693. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16145. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
Humans have reshaped the distribution of biodiversity across the globe, extirpating species from regions otherwise suitable and restricting populations to a subset of their original ranges. Here, we ask if anthropogenic range contractions since the Late Pleistocene led to an under-representation of the realized niches for megafauna, an emblematic group of taxa often targeted for restoration actions. Using reconstructions of past geographic distributions (i.e., natural ranges) for 146 extant terrestrial large-bodied (>44 kg) mammals, we estimate their climatic niches as if they had retained their original distributions and evaluate their observed niche dynamics. We found that range contractions led to a sizeable under-representation of the realized niches of several species (i.e., niche unfilling). For 29 species, more than 10% of the environmental space once seen in their natural ranges has been lost due to anthropogenic activity, with at least 12 species undergoing reductions of more than 50% of their realized niches. Eighteen species may now be confined to low-suitability locations, where fitness and abundance are likely diminished; we consider these taxa 'climatic refugees'. For those species, conservation strategies supported by current ranges risk being misguided if current, suboptimal habitats are considered baseline for future restoration actions. Because most climate-based biodiversity forecasts rely exclusively on current occurrence records, we went on to test the effect of neglecting historical information on estimates of species' potential distribution - as a proxy of sensitivity to climate change. We found that niche unfilling driven by past range contraction leads to an overestimation of sensitivity to future climatic change, resulting in 50% higher rates of global extinction, and underestimating the potential for megafauna conservation and restoration under future climate change. In conclusion, range contractions since the Late Pleistocene have also left imprints on megafauna realized climatic niches. Therefore, niche truncation driven by defaunation can directly affect climate and habitat-based conservation strategies.
人类已经重塑了全球生物多样性的分布,使物种从原本适宜的地区灭绝,并将种群限制在其原始分布范围的一个子集内。在这里,我们探讨自晚更新世以来的人为范围收缩是否导致巨型动物(一类常被作为恢复行动目标的标志性分类群)的实际生态位代表性不足。利用对146种现存陆生大型(>44千克)哺乳动物过去地理分布(即自然分布范围)的重建,我们估计了它们的气候生态位,就好像它们保留了原始分布一样,并评估了它们观察到的生态位动态。我们发现范围收缩导致几个物种的实际生态位出现相当大的代表性不足(即生态位未填满)。对于29个物种,由于人为活动,它们自然分布范围内曾经出现的超过10%的环境空间已经丧失,至少有12个物种的实际生态位减少了50%以上。18个物种现在可能被限制在适宜性较低的地点,在那里适合度和丰度可能会降低;我们将这些分类群视为“气候难民”。对于那些物种,如果将当前次优栖息地视为未来恢复行动的基线,那么基于当前分布范围的保护策略可能会被误导。由于大多数基于气候的生物多样性预测完全依赖于当前的出现记录,我们接着测试了忽视历史信息对物种潜在分布估计的影响——作为对气候变化敏感性的一个指标。我们发现,过去范围收缩导致的生态位未填满会导致对未来气候变化敏感性的高估,从而使全球灭绝率高出50%,并低估了未来气候变化下巨型动物保护和恢复的潜力。总之,自晚更新世以来的范围收缩也在巨型动物的实际气候生态位上留下了印记。因此,由动物灭绝驱动的生态位截断会直接影响基于气候和栖息地的保护策略。