Suppr超能文献

痴呆症照护共享与移民:家庭照护者经历的交叉领域探索。

Dementia care-sharing and migration: An intersectional exploration of family carers' experiences.

机构信息

Department of Citizenship and Humanization of the Public Sector, University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Pharos, National Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Aging Stud. 2022 Mar;60:100996. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100996. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Previous studies show that persons with a migration background (PwM) caring for a family member with dementia often experience access barriers to formal care services, and that family carers often perform the lion's share of care. Yet research offering a detailed account on their experiences of dementia care-sharing is sparse. In this paper, we respond to this knowledge gap by exploring how different social categories impact on practices of care-sharing in our participants and their families.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A qualitative study of six PwM who provide care for a family member with dementia was conducted through two methods: semi-structured, life-story interviews followed by "shadowing" our participants in their daily lives. We were guided by intersectionality as an analytical lens in exploring the multifaceted experiences of care-sharing.

FINDINGS

Throughout our analysis, intersections of migration history and social class stood out the most. We elucidate how they influence the attainment of necessary skills to organize and share care-tasks as well as perceptions of "good care." Additionally, our findings illustrate how one's position within the family, the presence or absence of supportive social networks, religion, gendered care norms, and relationship to the care-recipient are relevant to experiences of care-sharing.

IMPLICATIONS

Rather than overemphasizing ethnicity and culture, practice and policy should take into account that intersections of various social categories affect care-sharing and the type of support that is (or is not) organized.

摘要

背景与目的

既往研究表明,具有移民背景的照护者(PwM)在为痴呆症患者提供家庭照护时,往往面临着获得正规照护服务的障碍,且家庭照护者往往承担了大部分的照护工作。然而,关于他们在痴呆症照护分担方面的经验的研究却很少。在本文中,我们通过探讨不同的社会类别如何影响参与者及其家庭的照护分担实践,来填补这一知识空白。

研究设计与方法

通过两种方法对 6 名为痴呆症患者提供家庭照护的 PwM 进行了定性研究:半结构化的生活故事访谈,以及在日常生活中“跟踪”我们的参与者。我们以交叉性为分析视角,探索了照护分担的多方面经验。

结果

在整个分析过程中,移民历史和社会阶层的交叉点最为突出。我们阐明了它们如何影响组织和分担照护任务所需技能的获得,以及对“良好照护”的看法。此外,我们的研究结果还表明,一个人在家庭中的地位、是否有支持性的社交网络、宗教信仰、性别化的照护规范以及与照护对象的关系,都与照护分担的经验有关。

结论

实践和政策不应过分强调族裔和文化,而应考虑到各种社会类别交叉的影响,这些影响会影响到照护分担以及组织的支持类型(或不组织支持)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验