Suppr超能文献

一种用于评估潮式通气期间外科口罩气流阻力的物理模拟装置。

A Physical Analog to Assess Surgical Face Mask Air Flow Resistance During Tidal Ventilation.

作者信息

Demoulin Bruno, Duvivier Claude, Marchal François, Demoulin-Alexikova Silvia

机构信息

EA 3450 DevAH, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2022 Feb 17;13:808588. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.808588. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

A large variety of disposable face masks have been produced since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Decreased resistance to inspiration improves adherence to the use of the mask; the so called breathability is usually estimated by the measurement of air flow across a section of the tissue under a given pressure difference. We hypothesized that the mask pressure-flow relationship studied in conditions that mimic tidal breathing could allow a more comprehensive characterization of airflow resistance, a major determinant of mask comfort. A physical analog was made of a plaster cast dummy head connected through a pneumotachograph to a series of bellows inflated/deflated by a respirator. Pressure was measured at the mock airway opening over which the mask was carefully secured. The precision of the measurement equipment was quantified using two estimates of measurement error: repeatability coefficient (RC) and within-mask coefficient of variation (CV). The airflow resistance of 10 surgical masks was tested on 4 different days. Resistance means did not differ significantly among four repeated measures (0.34 hPa.s.L; 0.37 hPa.s.L; 0.37 hPa.s.L; and 0.37 hPa.s.L;  = 0.08), the estimated RC was 0.08 hPa.s.L [95%CI: 0.06-0.10 hPa.s.L], and CV was 8.7% [95%CI: 1.5-12.2%]. Multiple comparisons suggest the presence of a learning effect by which the operator reduced the error over the course of repetitive resistance measurements. Measurement precision improved considerably when the first set of measures was not taken into account [RC ~ 0.05 hPa.s.L (95%CI: 0.03-0.06 hPa.s.L); CV~4.5% (95%CI: 1.9-6.1%)]. The testing of the face mask resistance (R) appears simple and highly repeatable in conditions that resemble tidal breathing, once operator training was assured. The procedure adds further to the current standard assessment of breathability and allows estimating the maximal added respiratory load, about 10-20% of the respiratory resistance reported in heathy adult subjects.

摘要

自新冠疫情爆发以来,已生产出各种各样的一次性口罩。吸气阻力降低可提高对口罩使用的依从性;所谓的透气性通常是通过在给定压差下测量穿过一部分织物的气流来估算的。我们假设,在模拟潮式呼吸的条件下研究口罩压力-流量关系,可以更全面地表征气流阻力,而气流阻力是口罩舒适度的一个主要决定因素。制作了一个物理模拟装置,由一个石膏模型假人头通过呼吸流速计连接到一系列由呼吸器充气/放气的波纹管组成。在小心固定口罩的模拟气道开口处测量压力。使用测量误差的两种估计值来量化测量设备的精度:重复性系数(RC)和口罩内变异系数(CV)。在4个不同的日子里测试了10个外科口罩的气流阻力。四个重复测量的阻力平均值之间没有显著差异(0.34hPa·s/L;0.37hPa·s/L;0.37hPa·s/L;和0.37hPa·s/L;P = 0.08),估计的RC为0.08hPa·s/L [95%CI:0.06 - 0.10hPa·s/L],CV为8.7% [95%CI:1.5 - 12.2%]。多重比较表明存在学习效应,即操作人员在重复阻力测量过程中减少了误差。当不考虑第一组测量值时,测量精度有了显著提高[RC约为0.05hPa·s/L(95%CI:0.03 - 0.06hPa·s/L);CV约为4.5%(95%CI:1.9 - 6.1%)]。一旦确保操作人员经过培训,在类似潮式呼吸的条件下测试口罩阻力(R)似乎简单且高度可重复。该程序进一步补充了当前的透气性标准评估,并允许估算最大附加呼吸负荷,约为健康成年受试者报告的呼吸阻力的10 - 20%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2057/8891640/e82dfaad5ca6/fphys-13-808588-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验