School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China.
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 12;13:939311. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.939311. eCollection 2022.
Owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the emergency use of different types of COVID-19 vaccines, there is an urgent need to consider the effectiveness and persistence of different COVID-19 vaccines.
We investigated the immunogenicity of CoronaVac and Covilo, two inactivated vaccines against COVID-19 that each contain inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The levels of neutralizing antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2 and the inhibition rates of neutralizing antibodies to pseudovirus, as well as the immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM responses towards the spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) protein of SARS-CoV-2 at 180 days after two-dose vaccination were detected.
The CoronaVac and Covilo vaccines induced similar antibody responses. Regarding neutralizing antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2, 77.9% of the CoronaVac vaccine recipients and 78.3% of the Covilo vaccine recipients (aged 18-59 years) seroconverted by 28 days after the second vaccine dose. Regarding SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, 97.1% of the CoronaVac vaccine recipients and 95.7% of the Covilo vaccine recipients seroconverted by 28 days after the second vaccine dose. The inhibition rates of neutralizing antibody against a pseudovirus of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant were significantly lower compared with those against a pseudovirus of wildtype SARS-CoV-2. Associated with participant characteristics and antibody levels, persons in the older age group and with basic disease, especially a chronic respiratory disease, tended to have lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroconversion rates.
Antibodies that were elicited by these two inactivated COVID-19 vaccines appeared to wane following their peak after the second vaccine dose, but they persisted at detectable levels through 6 months after the second vaccine dose, and the effectiveness of these antibodies against the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 was lower than their effectiveness against wildtype SARS-CoV-2, which suggests that attention must be paid to the protective effectiveness, and its persistence, of COVID-19 vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 variants.
由于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行和对各种类型 COVID-19 疫苗的紧急使用,迫切需要考虑不同 COVID-19 疫苗的有效性和持久性。
我们研究了两种针对 COVID-19 的灭活疫苗——科兴疫苗和克尔来福疫苗的免疫原性,这两种疫苗均含有灭活的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)。在两剂接种后 180 天,检测了对活 SARS-CoV-2 的中和抗体水平、对假病毒的中和抗体抑制率,以及针对 SARS-CoV-2 的刺突(S)和核衣壳(N)蛋白的免疫球蛋白(Ig)G 和 IgM 反应。
科兴疫苗和克尔来福疫苗诱导的抗体反应相似。对于活 SARS-CoV-2 的中和抗体,77.9%的科兴疫苗接种者和 78.3%的克尔来福疫苗接种者(年龄在 18-59 岁)在第二剂疫苗接种后 28 天发生血清转换。对于 SARS-CoV-2 特异性抗体,77.9%的科兴疫苗接种者和 78.3%的克尔来福疫苗接种者在第二剂疫苗接种后 28 天发生血清转换。针对 SARS-CoV-2 Delta 变异株的假病毒的中和抗体抑制率明显低于针对野生型 SARS-CoV-2 的假病毒的中和抗体抑制率。与参与者特征和抗体水平相关,年龄较大且患有基础疾病(尤其是慢性呼吸道疾病)的人群,其抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清转化率较低。
这两种 COVID-19 灭活疫苗诱导的抗体在第二剂疫苗接种后达到峰值后似乎逐渐减弱,但在第二剂疫苗接种后 6 个月仍能检测到,且这些抗体对 SARS-CoV-2 Delta 变异株的有效性低于对野生型 SARS-CoV-2 的有效性,这提示我们必须关注 COVID-19 疫苗对 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的保护效力及其持久性。