• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of educational interventions to develop patient safety knowledge, skills, behaviours and attitudes in undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review protocol.教育干预措施在培养本科护生患者安全知识、技能、行为和态度方面的有效性:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):e058888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058888.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Baccalaureate nursing students' experiences with high-fidelity simulation: protocol for a qualitative systematic review.护理学士学生在高保真模拟中的体验:一项定性系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 8;10(12):e040171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040171.
5
Linguistically responsive learning and teaching for non-native speakers in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.本科护理教育中非母语者的语言响应式学习与教学:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e083181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083181.
6
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
7
Effectiveness of interprofessional education for medical and nursing professionals and students on interprofessional educational outcomes: A systematic review.跨专业教育对医学和护理专业人员及学生在跨专业教育成果方面的有效性:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Jan;74:103864. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103864. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
8
The effectiveness of learning strategies for the development of Emotional Intelligence in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review protocol.本科护理专业学生情商发展学习策略的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103797. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103797. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
9
The impact of design elements on undergraduate nursing students' educational outcomes in simulation education: protocol for a systematic review.设计元素对模拟教育中本科护理学生教育成果的影响:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 23;11(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01926-3.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Teaching-learning strategies on patient safety in higher education institutions: a scoping review.高等教育机构中患者安全的教学策略:一项范围综述
Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Mar 10;78(1):e20240270. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0270. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors Influencing Nursing Students' Willingness to Participate in Patient Safety: The Role of Patient Safety Confidence and Campaign Participation.影响护生参与患者安全意愿的因素:患者安全信心和活动参与的作用。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Feb 13;11:23779608251321359. doi: 10.1177/23779608251321359. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Senior nursing student's confidence in learnt competencies and perceptions of patient safety competency: a multisite cross-sectional study.护理专业高年级学生对所学能力的信心和对患者安全能力的认知:一项多地点横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 23;13(8):e070372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070372.
4
Effects of Integration of Social Marketing and Health Belief Model for Preventing Cholangiocarcinoma in High-Risk Areas of Thailand: A Community Intervention Study.社会营销与健康信念模式整合对泰国高危地区胆管癌预防效果的影响:一项社区干预研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221110420. doi: 10.1177/21501319221110420.

本文引用的文献

1
The knowledge about patient safety among undergraduate nurse students in Cyprus and Greece: a comparative study.塞浦路斯和希腊本科护生的患者安全知识:一项比较研究。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 25;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00610-6.
2
Patient safety educational interventions: A systematic review with recommendations for nurse educators.患者安全教育干预措施:护士教育者的系统评价及建议
Nurs Open. 2022 Jul;9(4):1967-1979. doi: 10.1002/nop2.955. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Perceived Patient Safety Competence of Baccalaureate Nursing Students: A Descriptive Comparative Study.本科护理专业学生对患者安全的认知能力:一项描述性比较研究。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jun 8;6:2377960820930134. doi: 10.1177/2377960820930134. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Nurses' Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review.护士对患者安全原则的遵守:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 19;17(6):2028. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062028.
6
Patient safety in primary and outpatient health care.基层医疗和门诊医疗中的患者安全。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jan 28;9(1):7-11. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_837_19. eCollection 2020 Jan.
7
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline.系统评价中不进行荟萃分析的综合 (SWiM):报告指南。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6890.
8
Regulation and current status of patient safety content in pre-registration nurse education in 27 countries: Findings from the Rationing - Missed nursing care (RANCARE) COST Action project.27 个国家注册护士教育中患者安全内容的监管现状:来自配给-护理缺失(RANCARE)联合行动项目的研究结果。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 May;37:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
9
Patient safety: a new basic science for professional education.患者安全:专业教育的一门新基础科学。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Mar 15;36(2):Doc21. doi: 10.3205/zma001229. eCollection 2019.
10
Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety.《人非圣贤,孰能无过:患者安全 20 年回顾与未来重点》
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1736-1743. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0738.

教育干预措施在培养本科护生患者安全知识、技能、行为和态度方面的有效性:系统评价方案。

Effectiveness of educational interventions to develop patient safety knowledge, skills, behaviours and attitudes in undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Kingston University and St George's University of London, Kingston upon Thames, UK

State Superintendence of the Ministry of Health in Goiás, Ministry of Health, Goiânia, Brazil.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):e058888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058888.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058888
PMID:35260461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8905990/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient safety is a healthcare discipline that aims to prevent and reduce patient harm, risks and errors during the provision of healthcare. Given the size of the nursing workforce in the healthcare system the inclusion of patient safety in the undergraduate nursing curriculum is necessary to enhance a safe culture in the daily work of their future careers. To this end, it is essential to apply effective teaching strategies to develop patient safety competencies. This review will aim to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in developing patient safety knowledge, skills, behaviours and attitudes in undergraduate nursing students within the existing topic areas of the WHO Multi-professional Patient Safety Curriculum Guide.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The databases Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Education Research Complete, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, Medes and Grey literature such as ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, DART-Europe, ProQuest Dissertations, CAPES thesis and dissertations, The Virginia Henderson Global e-Repository, Mednar and Thesis Canada will be searched from July 2011 to January 2022. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search, extract the data and assess the risk of bias for the included studies, using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. The quality of the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development and Evaluation methodology. Studies will be pooled in the meta-analysis. Alternatively, the findings will be presented in narrative form, including tables and figures, to aid in data presentation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study raises no ethical issues. The findings will be disseminated through presentations at professional conferences and publications in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021254965.

摘要

简介

患者安全是一门医疗保健学科,旨在预防和减少医疗保健过程中患者的伤害、风险和错误。鉴于护理人员在医疗保健系统中的规模庞大,将患者安全纳入本科护理课程对于在未来职业生涯的日常工作中培养安全文化是必要的。为此,必须应用有效的教学策略来培养患者安全能力。本综述旨在评估教育干预措施在培养本科护理学生的患者安全知识、技能、行为和态度方面的有效性,这些干预措施涵盖了世界卫生组织多专业患者安全课程指南中的现有主题领域。

方法与分析

将从 2011 年 7 月至 2022 年 1 月,在 Medline、CINAHL、Scopus、Education Research Complete、The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、LILACS、Medes 和灰色文献(如 ClinicalTrials.gov、Google Scholar、DART-Europe、ProQuest 论文和博士论文、Capes 论文和博士论文、弗吉尼亚·亨德森全球电子知识库、Mednar 和加拿大论文)中搜索 Medline、CINAHL、Scopus、Education Research Complete、The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、LILACS、Medes 和灰色文献(如 ClinicalTrials.gov、Google Scholar、DART-Europe、ProQuest 论文和博士论文、Capes 论文和博士论文、弗吉尼亚·亨德森全球电子知识库、Mednar 和加拿大论文)。将由两名独立的评审员进行搜索、提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,使用来自 Joanna Briggs 研究所的标准化批判性评价工具。使用推荐分级、评估、发展和评价方法评估证据的质量。将对研究进行汇总分析。或者,将以表格和图形等形式呈现研究结果,以帮助呈现数据。

伦理与传播

本研究没有伦理问题。研究结果将通过在专业会议上的演讲和在同行评议期刊上的发表来传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021254965。