• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯模型在综合和个体患者数据成分网络荟萃分析中的应用。

Bayesian models for aggregate and individual patient data component network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2022 Jun 30;41(14):2586-2601. doi: 10.1002/sim.9372. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1002/sim.9372
PMID:35261053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9314605/
Abstract

Network meta-analysis can synthesize evidence from studies comparing multiple treatments for the same disease. Sometimes the treatments of a network are complex interventions, comprising several independent components in different combinations. A component network meta-analysis (CNMA) can be used to analyze such data and can in principle disentangle the individual effect of each component. However, components may interact with each other, either synergistically or antagonistically. Deciding which interactions, if any, to include in a CNMA model may be difficult, especially for large networks with many components. In this article, we present two Bayesian CNMA models that can be used to identify prominent interactions between components. Our models utilize Bayesian variable selection methods, namely the stochastic search variable selection and the Bayesian LASSO, and can benefit from the inclusion of prior information about important interactions. Moreover, we extend these models to combine data from studies providing aggregate information and studies providing individual patient data (IPD). We illustrate our models in practice using three real datasets, from studies in panic disorder, depression, and multiple myeloma. Finally, we describe methods for developing web-applications that can utilize results from an IPD-CNMA, to allow for personalized estimates of relative treatment effects given a patient's characteristics.

摘要

网络荟萃分析可以综合比较同一疾病多种治疗方法的研究证据。有时,网络中的治疗方法是复杂的干预措施,由不同组合的几个独立成分组成。可以使用成分网络荟萃分析 (CNMA) 来分析此类数据,并且原则上可以分离每个成分的单独效果。但是,成分之间可能存在相互作用,无论是协同作用还是拮抗作用。决定在 CNMA 模型中包含哪些相互作用(如果有)可能很困难,尤其是对于具有许多成分的大型网络而言。在本文中,我们提出了两种可以用于识别成分之间突出相互作用的贝叶斯 CNMA 模型。我们的模型利用了贝叶斯变量选择方法,即随机搜索变量选择和贝叶斯 LASSO,并且可以受益于包含有关重要相互作用的先验信息。此外,我们将这些模型扩展到可以结合提供汇总信息的研究和提供个体患者数据 (IPD) 的研究的数据。我们使用来自惊恐障碍、抑郁症和多发性骨髓瘤研究的三个真实数据集在实践中说明了我们的模型。最后,我们描述了开发可以利用 IPD-CNMA 结果的网络应用程序的方法,以便根据患者的特征提供相对治疗效果的个性化估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f02/9314605/bf22a0fe4552/SIM-41-2586-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f02/9314605/1666d0d9c236/SIM-41-2586-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f02/9314605/49a27d814b9d/SIM-41-2586-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f02/9314605/bf22a0fe4552/SIM-41-2586-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f02/9314605/1666d0d9c236/SIM-41-2586-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f02/9314605/49a27d814b9d/SIM-41-2586-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f02/9314605/bf22a0fe4552/SIM-41-2586-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian models for aggregate and individual patient data component network meta-analysis.贝叶斯模型在综合和个体患者数据成分网络荟萃分析中的应用。
Stat Med. 2022 Jun 30;41(14):2586-2601. doi: 10.1002/sim.9372. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
3
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.行为干预戒烟:综述和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD013229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2.
4
Pharmacological and electronic cigarette interventions for smoking cessation in adults: component network meta-analyses.药物和电子烟干预成人戒烟的效果:成分网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):CD015226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015226.pub2.
5
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Deconstructing resuscitation training for healthcare providers: a protocol for a component network meta-analysis.解构医疗服务提供者的复苏培训:一项成分网络荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e094869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094869.
2
Factors associated with the effectiveness of interventions to prevent obesity in children: a synthesis of evidence from 204 randomised trials.与儿童肥胖预防干预措施效果相关的因素:来自204项随机试验的证据综合
BMJ Public Health. 2025 May 12;3(1):e001707. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001707. eCollection 2025.
3
Improving the adoption of a school-based nutrition program: findings from a collaborative network of randomised trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data.拆解、优化和个性化互联网认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症:一项基于个体参与者数据的系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;8(6):500-511. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00077-8. Epub 2021 May 3.
2
A review of methods for addressing components of interventions in meta-analysis.元分析中干预措施各组成部分处理方法的综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246631. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparing methods for estimating patient-specific treatment effects in individual patient data meta-analysis.
提高一项校内营养计划的采用率:来自随机试验协作网络的研究结果。
Implement Sci. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01417-8.
4
A Complex Meta-Regression Model to Identify Effective Features of Interventions From Multi-Arm, Multi-Follow-Up Trials.一种复杂的荟萃回归模型,用于从多臂、多随访试验中确定干预措施的有效特征。
Stat Med. 2024 Nov 30;43(27):5217-5233. doi: 10.1002/sim.10237. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
5
Model selection for component network meta-analysis in connected and disconnected networks: a simulation study.组件网络荟萃分析中连接和不连接网络的模型选择:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01959-9.
6
Four 2×2 factorial trials of smartphone CBT to reduce subthreshold depression and to prevent new depressive episodes among adults in the community-RESiLIENT trial (Resilience Enhancement with Smartphone in LIving ENvironmenTs): a master protocol.智能手机认知行为疗法降低社区成年人亚临床抑郁及预防新发抑郁发作的四项 2×2 析因试验——RESiLIENT 试验(在生活环境中用智能手机增强韧性):一项主方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 24;13(2):e067850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067850.
7
Comparative effectiveness of oral antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in the prevention of postoperative infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: A network meta-analysis.口服抗生素、益生菌、益生元和合生元在预防结直肠手术后患者术后感染中的疗效比较:网络荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Feb;20(2):567-578. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13888. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
个体患者数据荟萃分析中估计患者特异性治疗效果的方法比较。
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 15;40(6):1553-1573. doi: 10.1002/sim.8859. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
4
Component network meta-analysis compared to a matching method in a disconnected network: A case study.成分网络荟萃分析与不连通网络中匹配方法的比较:一个案例研究。
Biom J. 2021 Feb;63(2):447-461. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900339. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
5
The dark side of the force: Multiplicity issues in network meta-analysis and how to address them.力的黑暗面:网络荟萃分析中的多重性问题及其解决方法。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Jan;11(1):105-122. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1377. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Network meta-analysis of multicomponent interventions.网络荟萃分析的多组分干预措施。
Biom J. 2020 May;62(3):808-821. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800167. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Dismantling, personalising and optimising internet cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression: a study protocol for individual participant data component network meta-analysis.拆解、个性化和优化互联网认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的研究方案:一项个体参与者数据成分网络荟萃分析研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;8(11):e026137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026137.
8
Dismantling cognitive-behaviour therapy for panic disorder: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.拆解惊恐障碍的认知行为疗法:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2018 Sep;48(12):1945-1953. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003919. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
An overview of methods for network meta-analysis using individual participant data: when do benefits arise?使用个体参与者数据进行网络荟萃分析方法概述:何时会产生获益?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 May;27(5):1351-1364. doi: 10.1177/0962280216660741. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
10
GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.网络荟萃分析中的“真实化”:方法学综述
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Sep;7(3):236-63. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1195. Epub 2016 Jan 11.