Donato Leslie J, Theel Elitza S, Baumann Nikola A, Bridgeman Amber R, Blommel Joseph H, Wu Yanhong, Karon Brad S
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
J Clin Virol Plus. 2021 Sep;1(3):100030. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100030. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
Serologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 can be used for evaluation of past infection in individual patients and for community seroprevalence studies. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the Genalyte Maverick SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen Serology Panel compared to the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (NC) qualitative immunoassay, using well characterized clinical serum samples. A total of 143 pre-pandemic sera and 48 sera collected from patients with a negative molecular SARS-CoV-2 result were used for specificity studies. For sensitivity analyses, 179 sera were used, obtained 3-7 days, 8-14 days, or ≥ 15 days after symptom onset from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Specificity was determined to be 95.3% (182/191) for the Genalyte Maverick. Overall sensitivity of the Genalyte Maverick was similar to that observed for the Roche Elecsys NC test, 79.3% (142/179) vs. 76.5% (137/179), respectively. Genalyte Maverick trended, without statistical significance, towards higher sensitivity as compared to the Roche Elecsys NC test in the 3-7 days (11/25 vs. 9/25, respectively) and 8-14 days (21/28 vs. 19/28, respectively) post-symptom onset sample sets, but was identical in the ≥ 15 days post-symptom onset group (106/116 vs. 106/116, respectively). Therefore, the Genalyte Maverick serologic test had similar overall sensitivity to the Roche Elecsys NC assay, but may have slightly improved sensitivity for early seroconversion. The lower Genalyte Maverick specificity as compared to the Roche Elecsys NC assay as reported by other studies (>99%), may necessitate confirmatory testing of positive Genalyte Maverick results if implemented for clinical use.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)血清学检测可用于评估个体患者既往感染情况以及社区血清流行率研究。我们使用特征明确的临床血清样本,将Genalyte Maverick SARS-CoV-2多抗原血清学检测板与罗氏Elecsys抗SARS-CoV-2核衣壳(NC)定性免疫测定法的分析性能和临床性能进行了比较。共143份疫情前血清和48份分子检测SARS-CoV-2结果为阴性的患者血清用于特异性研究。对于敏感性分析,使用了179份血清,这些血清来自确诊SARS-CoV-2感染患者症状出现后3 - 7天、8 - 14天或≥15天。Genalyte Maverick的特异性为95.3%(182/191)。Genalyte Maverick的总体敏感性与罗氏Elecsys NC检测法相似,分别为79.3%(142/179)和76.5%(137/179)。与罗氏Elecsys NC检测法相比,Genalyte Maverick在症状出现后3 - 7天(分别为11/25和9/25)以及8 - 14天(分别为21/28和19/28)的样本组中敏感性有升高趋势,但无统计学意义,而在症状出现后≥15天的组中两者相同(分别为106/116和106/116)。因此,Genalyte Maverick血清学检测的总体敏感性与罗氏Elecsys NC测定法相似,但在早期血清转化方面敏感性可能略有提高。与其他研究报道的罗氏Elecsys NC测定法(>99%)相比,Genalyte Maverick特异性较低,如果用于临床,可能需要对Genalyte Maverick阳性结果进行确证检测。