Suppr超能文献

检测商业犬粮中的鸡 DNA。

Detection of chicken DNA in commercial dog foods.

机构信息

Department of Monogastric Animal Sciences, Division of Animal Nutrition and Food, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 29 Klemensa Janickiego, 71-270, Szczecin, Poland.

Department of Animal Molecular Biology, National Research Institute of Animal Production, 1, Krakowska Street, 32-083, Balice, Poland.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2022 Mar 9;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03200-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

These days the number of potential food allergens is very large, but chicken is one of the most common allergens in dogs. Elimination diet is one of the clinical tools for the diagnosis of allergies and allergy tests are not very reliable. The restriction diet is most commonly carried out by feeding pet foods, relying on the ingredients on the label to select an elimination diet not containing previously eaten foods. Unfortunately, mislabeling of pet food is quite common. The purpose of this study was to determine the absence or presence of chicken DNA using both qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis methods in dry and wet maintenance complete pet foods for adult dogs. Results were used to verify the declared composition on the labels.

RESULTS

Eleven out of fifteen (73%) dog foods were produced as declared by the manufacturer, two of which showed the presence of chicken protein as stated on the label. The remaining nine foods contained amounts of chicken DNA below 1%, consistent with declarations that no chicken was added in the composition. Four of tested dog foods (27%) were not produced consistently with the declaration on the packaging. Two dog foods (one dry and one wet) did not contain the claimed chicken protein. In two foods the addition of chicken DNA was detected at the level of over 2% and almost 6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we focused on one of the most commonly undeclared animal species on the label-chicken protein-and performed DNA analyzes to investigate possible contamination and mislabeling. The results showed some inaccuracies. However, most of them are trace amounts below 1%, which proves compliance with the label. Our results showed that undeclared animal species can be as common as missing an animal protein declared on the label. The conducted research indicates that both dry and wet analyzed foods should not be recommended as a diagnostic tool in elimination tests, because it may result in false negative results. Over-the-counter maintenance foods for dogs should not be recommended for the diagnosis and treatment of food hypersensitivity.

摘要

背景

如今潜在的食物过敏原数量非常庞大,但鸡肉是犬类最常见的过敏原之一。饮食排除法是诊断过敏的临床工具之一,而过敏测试并不十分可靠。限制饮食法最常通过给宠物喂食宠物食品来进行,依靠标签上的成分来选择不含之前食用过的食物的排除饮食。不幸的是,宠物食品的标签错误很常见。本研究的目的是使用定性和定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析方法,确定成犬干湿性维持全价宠物食品中是否存在鸡肉 DNA。结果用于验证标签上的声明成分。

结果

15 种犬粮中有 11 种(73%)与制造商声明的一致,其中 2 种标签上标明的鸡肉蛋白含量与实际相符。其余 9 种食品的鸡肉 DNA 含量低于 1%,与声明中没有添加鸡肉的成分相符。在测试的 4 种犬粮(27%)中,有 2 种与包装上的声明不一致。2 种犬粮(一种干粮和一种湿粮)未含有宣称的鸡肉蛋白。在两种食品中,分别检测到鸡肉 DNA 的添加量超过 2%和近 6%。

结论

在这项研究中,我们专注于标签上最常见的未申报动物物种之一——鸡肉蛋白,并进行 DNA 分析,以调查可能的污染和标签错误。结果显示存在一些不准确之处。然而,大多数都是低于 1%的痕量,这证明符合标签。我们的结果表明,未申报的动物物种可能与标签上声明的动物蛋白一样常见。进行的研究表明,不应推荐分析的干、湿食品作为排除测试的诊断工具,因为这可能导致假阴性结果。非处方维持性犬粮不应推荐用于食物过敏的诊断和治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a116/8905904/9e0507675dde/12917_2022_3200_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验