Institute of Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e050305. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050305.
To investigate the efficacy, safety and applicability of internet-based, therapist-led partner-assisted cognitive-behavioural writing therapy (iCBT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after intensive care for sepsis in patients and their spouses compared with a waitlist (WL) control group.
Randomised-controlled, parallel group, open-label, superiority trial with concealed allocation.
Internet-based intervention in Germany; location-independent via web-portal.
Patients after intensive care for sepsis and their spouses of whom at least one had a presumptive PTSD diagnosis (PTSD-Checklist (PCL-5)≥33). Initially planned sample size: 98 dyads.
ICBT group: 10 writing assignments over a 5-week period; WL control group: 5-week waiting period.
Primary outcome: pre-post change in PTSD symptom severity (PCL-5).
remission of PTSD, depression, anxiety and somatisation, relationship satisfaction, health-related quality of life, premature termination of treatment. Outcomes measures were applied pre and post treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up.
Twenty-five dyads representing 34 participants with a presumptive PTSD diagnosis were randomised and analysed (ITT principle). There was no evidence for a difference in PCL-5 pre-post change for iCBT compared with WL (mean difference -0.96, 95% CI (-5.88 to 3.97), p=0.703). No adverse events were reported. Participants confirmed the applicability of iCBT.
ICBT was applied to reduce PTSD symptoms after intensive care for sepsis, for the first time addressing both patients and their spouses. It was applicable and safe in the given population. There was no evidence for the efficacy of iCBT on PTSD symptom severity. Due to the small sample size our findings remain preliminary but can guide further research, which is needed to determine if modified approaches to post-intensive care PTSD may be more effective.
DRKS00010676.
研究基于互联网的、由治疗师主导的伴侣辅助认知行为写作治疗(iCBT)对脓毒症重症监护后创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的疗效、安全性和适用性,与等待名单(WL)对照组相比。
随机对照、平行组、开放标签、优效性试验,采用隐藏分组。
德国的基于互联网的干预措施;通过网络门户实现地理位置独立。
脓毒症重症监护后患者及其配偶,其中至少有一人被推定患有 PTSD(PTSD 检查表(PCL-5)≥33)。最初计划的样本量:98 对夫妇。
iCBT 组:在 5 周内完成 10 次写作作业;WL 对照组:5 周的等待期。
主要结局:PTSD 症状严重程度(PCL-5)的治疗前后变化。
PTSD、抑郁、焦虑和躯体化、关系满意度、健康相关生活质量、治疗提前终止的缓解情况。结局测量在治疗前、治疗后以及 3、6 和 12 个月随访时进行。
25 对代表 34 名被推定患有 PTSD 的参与者被随机分配并进行了分析(意向性治疗原则)。与 WL 相比,iCBT 在 PCL-5 治疗前后的变化中没有证据表明存在差异(平均差异-0.96,95%CI(-5.88 至 3.97),p=0.703)。没有报告不良事件。参与者确认了 iCBT 的适用性。
首次针对脓毒症重症监护后的患者及其配偶,应用 iCBT 降低 PTSD 症状。它在给定人群中是适用且安全的。没有证据表明 iCBT 对 PTSD 症状严重程度有效。由于样本量较小,我们的发现仍初步,但可以为进一步研究提供指导,需要进一步研究来确定针对重症监护后 PTSD 的改良方法是否更有效。
DRKS00010676。