• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与 10 万基因组计划中罕见病基因组测序的体验:一项混合方法研究。

Participant experiences of genome sequencing for rare diseases in the 100,000 Genomes Project: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 May;30(5):604-610. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01065-2. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1038/s41431-022-01065-2
PMID:35264738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9091267/
Abstract

In this mixed methods study, a survey and in-depth interviews were used to explore whether decision regret and the psychological impact of receiving genome sequencing (GS) results differed between parents and patients, and between those who received a genetic diagnosis and those who did not. Participants (n = 77) completed a survey that included the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) and an adaptation of the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) at least 12 months after consenting for GS for rare disease diagnosis in the 100,000 Genomes Project. Survey participants were invited to take part in an interview and 39 agreed; 12 with a diagnosis, 5 with variants of uncertain significance, and 19 with no pathogenic findings identified. Both survey and interview findings indicated that decision regret was low. DRS scores revealed no differences in levels of regret between parents and patients, or between those with a diagnosis and those without. Though MICRA scores indicated minimal evidence of negative psychological impacts of receiving GS results, subscale analysis revealed greater distress and uncertainty for parents compared to patients. Receiving a diagnosis was found not to influence MICRA scores, supporting interview findings of both positive and negative emotional and psychological impacts irrespective of a genetic diagnosis. Our findings have implications for policy and practice as GS is integrated into the UK and worldwide; notably, that expectation-setting is critical when offering GS, and that post-test counselling is important regardless of the GS result received, with parents perhaps needing additional emotional support.

摘要

在这项混合方法研究中,我们采用了调查和深入访谈的方法,旨在探讨在接受基因组测序(GS)结果时,父母和患者之间以及接受和未接受遗传诊断的患者之间,决策后悔和心理影响是否存在差异。参与者(n=77)在同意参与英国 10 万基因组计划(100,000 Genomes Project)中进行罕见病诊断的 GS 检测至少 12 个月后,完成了包括决策后悔量表(DRS)和癌症风险评估多维影响(MICRA)改编版在内的调查。调查参与者被邀请参加访谈,其中 39 人同意;12 人有诊断结果,5 人有不确定意义的变异,19 人未发现致病性发现。调查和访谈结果均表明,决策后悔程度较低。DRS 评分显示,父母和患者之间、有诊断和无诊断患者之间的后悔水平没有差异。尽管 MICRA 评分表明接受 GS 结果对心理的负面影响较小,但子量表分析显示,与患者相比,父母的痛苦和不确定性更大。研究发现,诊断结果并不会影响 MICRA 评分,这支持了访谈结果,即无论是否有遗传诊断,接受 GS 检测都会带来积极和消极的情绪和心理影响。我们的研究结果对政策和实践具有重要意义,因为 GS 正在被整合到英国和全球的医疗体系中;尤其是在提供 GS 时,期望设定至关重要,并且无论接受的 GS 结果如何,测试后咨询都很重要,父母可能需要额外的情感支持。

相似文献

1
Participant experiences of genome sequencing for rare diseases in the 100,000 Genomes Project: a mixed methods study.参与 10 万基因组计划中罕见病基因组测序的体验:一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 May;30(5):604-610. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01065-2. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Knowledge, attitudes and decision regret: a longitudinal survey study of participants offered genome sequencing in the 100,000 Genomes Project.知识、态度和决策后悔:在 10 万基因组计划中提供基因组测序的参与者的纵向调查研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Dec;31(12):1407-1413. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01470-1. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
After genomic testing results: Parents' long-term views.基因检测结果出来后:家长的长远看法。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Feb;31(1):82-95. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1454. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.围绕胚胎植入前非整倍体遗传学检测的认知、动机和决策后悔。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep 1;35(9):2047-2057. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa154.
5
Parents' motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview study.父母进行基因组测序的动机、关注点和理解:一项定性访谈研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jul;28(7):874-884. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0575-2. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
6
Parent decisional regret regarding neonatal circumcision in an American outpatient pediatric urology clinic.美国小儿泌尿外科门诊中父母对新生儿行包皮环切术的决策后悔。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Dec;20(6):1192-1199. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.018. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Decisional Satisfaction, Regret, and Conflict Among Parents of Infants with Neurologic Conditions.神经疾病患儿父母的决策满意度、后悔和冲突。
J Pediatr. 2022 Jun;245:81-88.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.043. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
8
Decision regret among couples experiencing infertility: a mixed methods longitudinal cohort study.夫妇在不孕经历中面临的决策后悔:一项混合方法纵向队列研究。
Reprod Health. 2023 Nov 9;20(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01699-5.
9
Decision-Making Quality in Parents Considering Adenotonsillectomy or Tympanostomy Tube Insertion for Their Children.父母在考虑为孩子行腺样体切除术或鼓膜切开置管术时的决策质量。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):260-266. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3365.
10
Genome sequencing among children with medical complexity: What constitutes value from parents' perspective?患有复杂疾病儿童的基因组测序:从家长角度看什么是有价值的?
J Genet Couns. 2022 Apr;31(2):523-533. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1522. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Anxiety and quality-of-life for parents of children with undiagnosed rare conditions: A multi-site quantitative survey study.未确诊罕见病患儿家长的焦虑与生活质量:一项多中心定量调查研究
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70085. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70085.
2
Identifying the Impacts, Obstacles and Information Barriers for Parents of Children Living With Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Qualitative Study.识别神经发育遗传性疾病患儿家长所面临的影响、障碍和信息壁垒:一项定性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70340. doi: 10.1111/hex.70340.
3
Evidence of inequities experienced by the rare disease community with respect to receipt of a diagnosis and access to services: a scoping review of UK and international evidence.罕见病群体在获得诊断和服务方面所经历的不平等证据:对英国及国际证据的范围审查
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jun 12;20(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03818-w.
4
A roadmap for genome projects to foster psychosocial and economic evidence to further policy and practice.基因组计划路线图,以促进社会心理和经济证据,推动政策与实践发展。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 27;5(1):198. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00917-4.
5
Using mixed methods for genetic counseling research.采用混合方法进行遗传咨询研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70031. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70031.
6
The value of large-scale programmes in human genomics.人类基因组学中大规模项目的价值。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 May;33(5):563-569. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01844-7. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
7
Experiences of participants with undiagnosed diseases and hereditary cancers during the initial phase of the Hong Kong genome project: a mixed-methods study.香港基因组计划初始阶段未确诊疾病和遗传性癌症参与者的经历:一项混合方法研究
Hum Genomics. 2025 Apr 5;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00746-5.
8
Beyond the Diagnosis: Valuing Genome-Wide Sequencing for Rare Disease Diagnosis Using Contingent Valuation.超越诊断:使用条件价值评估法评估全基因组测序在罕见病诊断中的价值
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 May;23(3):425-439. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00948-x. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
9
Parental knowledge, attitudes, satisfaction and decisional conflict regarding whole genome sequencing in the Genomic Medicine Service: a multisite survey study in England.基因组医学服务中父母对全基因组测序的认知、态度、满意度及决策冲突:英国的一项多中心调查研究
J Med Genet. 2025 Mar 20;62(4):289-297. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2024-110458.
10
Navigating an Uninformative Genomic Test Result: A Practical Guide.解读无信息价值的基因组检测结果:实用指南
J Paediatr Child Health. 2025 Mar;61(3):344-353. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16792. Epub 2025 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient empowerment of people living with rare diseases. Its contribution to sustainable and resilient healthcare systems.罕见病患者赋权。对可持续和有弹性的医疗保健系统的贡献。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2019 Jul-Sep;55(3):283-291. doi: 10.4415/ANN_19_03_15.