Chen Minjie, Wei Anji, Xu Jianjiang, Zhou Xingtao, Hong Jiaxu
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China.
Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration of Shanghai, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China.
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 28;11(5):1343. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051343.
To compare the interoperator repeatability of tear meniscus height (TMH) measurements obtained with a keratograph and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) and to assess the agreement between the methods.Forty-seven eyes with DED and 41 healthy eyes were analyzed using the Schirmer test I and tear breakup time test (TBUT). The TMH was measured three times with each device. The repeatability of measurements was assessed by within-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability (2.77 Sw), coefficient of variation (CoV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Efficacy in detecting DED was evaluated in terms of the area under the curve (AUC). The TMHs obtained with the keratograph were 0.03 mm lower than those obtained with FD-OCT in both groups (p < 0.001 for the DED group and p = 0.0143 for the control group, respectively). The intraexaminerICCs of the keratographic TMH were 0.789 and 0.817 for the DED and control groups, respectively, and those of the FD-OCT TMH were 0.859 and 0.845, respectively. Although a close correlation was found between the TMHs measured with the keratograph and FD-OCT by the Spearman analysis in both groups (both p < 0.001), poor agreement between the devices was shown in both groups using a Bland−Altman plot. The AUCs of the keratography and FD-OCT results were 0.971 (p < 0.001) and 0.923 (p < 0.001), respectively. Both devices had excellent diagnostic accuracy in differentiating normal patients from DED patients. FD-OCT TMH measurements were more reliable than the keratograph data in the DED group. Agreement between the devices was poor in both groups.
比较使用角膜地形图仪和傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描(FD-OCT)测量泪膜半月板高度(TMH)的不同操作者之间的可重复性,并评估两种方法之间的一致性。对47只患有干眼的眼睛和41只健康眼睛进行了Schirmer I试验和泪膜破裂时间试验(TBUT)分析。每种设备对TMH进行三次测量。测量的可重复性通过受试者内标准差(Sw)、重复性(2.77Sw)、变异系数(CoV)和组内相关系数(ICC)进行评估。根据曲线下面积(AUC)评估检测干眼的效能。在两组中,角膜地形图仪测得的TMH均比FD-OCT测得的低0.03mm(干眼组p<0.001,对照组p=0.0143)。角膜地形图TMH的检查者内ICC在干眼组和对照组分别为0.789和0.817,FD-OCT TMH的检查者内ICC分别为0.859和0.845。尽管两组通过Spearman分析发现角膜地形图仪和FD-OCT测量的TMH之间存在密切相关性(均p<0.001),但使用Bland-Altman图显示两组设备之间的一致性较差。角膜地形图和FD-OCT结果的AUC分别为0.971(p<0.001)和0.923(p<0.001)。两种设备在区分正常患者和干眼患者方面均具有出色的诊断准确性。在干眼组中,FD-OCT TMH测量比角膜地形图仪数据更可靠。两组设备之间的一致性均较差。