Sasi Archana, Ganguly Shuvadeep, Biswas Bivas, Pushpam Deepam, Kumar Akash, Agarwala Sandeep, Khan Shah Alam, Kumar Venkatesan Sampath, Deo Suryanarayana, Sharma Daya Nand, Biswas Ahitagni, Mridha Asit, Barwad Adarsh, Thulkar Sanjay, Bakhshi Sameer
Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India.
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Centre Kolkata, India.
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):927-941. eCollection 2022.
Prognostic scores in Ewing sarcoma including baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics are necessary for pre-treatment risk stratification. In this study, we formulated and validated a prognostic model for baseline risk categorization in Ewing sarcoma.
A retrospective single-institutional study was conducted on Ewing sarcoma patients treated uniformly between January 2003 and December 2018. Baseline clinical/pathological characteristics and survival outcomes were noted from medical records. The cohort was randomised into a derivation and validation cohort. A prognostic score was formulated by including independent prognostic factors from the derivation cohort by multivariable analysis. The prognostic model was validated in the validation cohort along with estimation of its predictive ability.
A total of 860 patients were included with 40.3% having baseline metastases. Tumor diameter >5 cm (HR 2.04; P<0.001; score 2), baseline metastases (HR 2.33; P<0.001, score 2), and total leucocyte count >11000/mm (HR 1.44; P=0.015; score 1) were independent predictors of overall survival in derivation cohort and included for prognostic score calculation. Patients were categorized into low (score 0), intermediate (score 1-3) and high-risk (score 4-5) groups. Harrell's c-indexes of the model were 0.625, 0.622 and 0.624 in the derivation, validation and whole cohort respectively. The timed AUC of ROC of the prognostic score-group for 5-year survival was 0.72, 0.71 and 0.73 in the derivation, validation and whole cohort respectively.
We have formulated and validated a prognostic score for Ewing sarcoma incorporating baseline clinical and laboratory parameters, with fair predictive ability for risk stratification and facilitating risk-adapted personalized therapy.
尤因肉瘤的预后评分,包括基线临床和实验室特征,对于治疗前风险分层至关重要。在本研究中,我们制定并验证了一个用于尤因肉瘤基线风险分类的预后模型。
对2003年1月至2018年12月期间接受统一治疗的尤因肉瘤患者进行了一项回顾性单机构研究。从病历中记录基线临床/病理特征和生存结果。该队列被随机分为推导队列和验证队列。通过多变量分析纳入推导队列中的独立预后因素来制定预后评分。在验证队列中验证预后模型,并评估其预测能力。
共纳入860例患者,其中40.3%有基线转移。肿瘤直径>5 cm(HR 2.04;P<0.001;评分2)、基线转移(HR 2.33;P<0.001,评分2)和白细胞总数>11000/mm(HR 1.44;P=0.015;评分1)是推导队列中总生存的独立预测因素,并纳入预后评分计算。患者被分为低风险(评分0)、中风险(评分1 - 3)和高风险(评分4 - 5)组。该模型在推导队列、验证队列和整个队列中的Harrell's c指数分别为0.625、0.622和0.624。预后评分组5年生存的ROC曲线的时间AUC在推导队列、验证队列和整个队列中分别为0.72、0.71和0.73。
我们制定并验证了一个包含基线临床和实验室参数的尤因肉瘤预后评分,对风险分层具有合理的预测能力,有助于进行风险适应性个体化治疗。