Suppr超能文献

吉森主观抱怨量表(GBB-8)英文版的心理测量学特性和验证。

Psychometric properties and validation of the English version Giessen Subjective Complaints List (GBB-8).

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine III, Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2022 Mar 11;10(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00741-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the newly developed English version of the Giessen Subjective Complaint List-8 (GBB-8), a questionnaire assessing psychosomatic symptoms with regard to exhaustion, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and cardiovascular.

METHODS

A U.S. sample of 638 participants (47.6% female) was recruited by MTurk to participate in this cross-sectional online survey. Validation instruments included the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, Perceived Stress Scale, short version of the Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress.

RESULTS

Reliability was high with ω's between .80 and .86 for all subscales. Confirmatory factor analyses yielded comparable good model fit for a four-dimensional model as well as a higher order model. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses confirmed measurement invariance of the GBB-8 across sex and age. Regarding convergent validity, correlations with other instruments were highly significant and of large magnitude as expected.

CONCLUSION

The English version of the GBB-8 has shown excellent psychometric properties. Therefore, it can be recommended for the assessment of psychosomatic complaints in contexts where short screening instruments are necessary.

摘要

背景

本研究调查了新开发的英文版 Giessen 主观抱怨清单-8(GBB-8)的心理测量特性,该问卷评估了与疲惫、胃肠道、肌肉骨骼和心血管有关的身心症状。

方法

通过 MTurk 招募了 638 名美国参与者(47.6%为女性)参与这项横断面在线调查。验证工具包括患者健康问卷-4、感知压力量表、慢性应激特里尔量表简短版。

结果

所有分量表的 ω 值在.80 和.86 之间,可靠性较高。验证性因子分析表明,四维度模型和高阶模型具有相当好的模型拟合度。多组验证性因子分析证实了 GBB-8 在性别和年龄上的测量不变性。关于聚合效度,与其他工具的相关性高度显著且符合预期的大。

结论

GBB-8 的英文版本表现出优异的心理测量特性。因此,它可以在需要简短筛查工具的情况下推荐用于评估身心抱怨。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.利用众包便利样本进行临床研究。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Adjusting Incremental Fit Indices for Nonnormality.针对非正态性调整增量拟合指数。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):460-70. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.933697.
8
Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale.压力知觉量表的心理计量学证据回顾。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2012 Dec;6(4):121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验