Kliem Sören, Lohmann Anna, Klatt Thimna, Mößle Thomas, Rehbein Florian, Hinz Andreas, Beutel Manfred, Brähler Elmar
Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony, Germany; Technical University of Brunswick, Department of Psychology, Germany.
Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony, Germany.
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Apr;95:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
Although there is no causal relationship to medical morbidity, routine clinical assessment of somatic symptoms aids medical diagnosis and assessment of treatment effectiveness. Regardless of their causes, somatic symptoms indicate suffering, distress, and help-seeking behavior. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a brief self-report questionnaire to assess somatic symptom strain.
A brief form of the Giessen Subjective Complaints List (GBB-8) was developed and validated in a large population sample representative of the Federal Republic of Germany (N=2008). Psychometric analyses included confirmation of factor structure, classical item analysis, and measurement invariance tests. The sample furthermore served as a norm group. As indicators of construct validity, correlations with measures of anxiety, depression, alexithymia, and primary care contact were computed.
Psychometric analyses yielded excellent scale properties regarding item characteristics, factor structure, and measurement invariance tests (Cronbach's alpha=0.88; CFI=0.980, TLI=0.965, RMSEA=0.049) for the second-order four-factor model; strict invariance was confirmed for gender, depression status, and physician contacts; strong invariance was confirmed regarding age and age×gender.
The GBB-8 with its four subscales exhaustion, gastrointestinal complaints, musculoskeletal complaints, and cardiovascular complaints proves to be an economic measure of subjective symptom strain. Psychometric analyses deem it suitable for epidemiological research. The availability of norms makes it a potential everyday tool for general practitioners and psychosomatic clinics.
尽管躯体症状与发病情况之间不存在因果关系,但对躯体症状进行常规临床评估有助于医学诊断和治疗效果评估。无论其病因如何,躯体症状都表明存在痛苦、困扰以及寻求帮助的行为。本研究的目的是开发并验证一份简短的自我报告问卷,以评估躯体症状负担。
在代表德意志联邦共和国的大量人群样本(N = 2008)中开发并验证了简短版的吉森主观症状清单(GBB - 8)。心理测量分析包括因子结构确认、经典项目分析和测量不变性检验。该样本还用作常模组。计算与焦虑、抑郁、述情障碍和初级保健接触测量指标的相关性,作为结构效度指标。
对于二阶四因子模型,心理测量分析在项目特征、因子结构和测量不变性检验方面产生了出色的量表特性(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.88;CFI = 0.980,TLI = 0.965,RMSEA = 0.049);确认了性别、抑郁状态和医生接触方面的严格不变性;在年龄和年龄×性别方面确认了强不变性。
具有疲惫、胃肠道不适、肌肉骨骼不适和心血管不适四个子量表的GBB - 8被证明是一种评估主观症状负担的有效方法。心理测量分析认为它适用于流行病学研究。常模的可用性使其成为全科医生和身心诊所潜在的日常工具。