• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高强度功能性训练中的损伤:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Injuries During High-Intensity Functional Training: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

出版信息

J Spec Oper Med. 2022 Spring;22(1):121-129. doi: 10.55460/G29P-I0AU.

DOI:10.55460/G29P-I0AU
PMID:35278328
Abstract

High-intensity functional training (HIFT) involves high-volume and high-intensity physical activities with short rest periods between movements and use of multiple joint exercises. This article reports the results of a systematic review and meta- analysis of studies involving injuries during HIFT. Individual studies were selected for review if they involved individuals =18 years of age and provided quantitative data on injury prevalence and/or injury rates during HIFT. Twenty-eight studies involving 11,089 participants met the inclusion criteria. There was considerable variability in individual studies with injury prevalences ranging from 12% to 74% and injury rates from 0.04 to 18.90 injuries/1000 h of training. Meta-analyses indicated that the overall injury prevalence was 36% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 32-41%) and overall injury rate 4.3 injuries/1000 h (95% CI = 3.35-5.23). Injury rates among the five available prospective cohort studies was considerably higher, 9.9 injuries/1000 h (95% CI = 3.3-16.4). The most commonly injured anatomical locations (with % of total injuries) were the shoulder (26%), back/spine (26%), knee (14%), wrist/hands/fingers (12%), arm/elbow (10%), and ankle/foot (6%). Given the higher injury rates among prospective studies that likely more effectively tracked injuries over time, more prospectively designed studies are required before the injury rate during HIFT can be appropriately quantified.

摘要

高强度功能性训练(HIFT)涉及高容量和高强度的身体活动,运动之间的休息时间短,并使用多关节练习。本文报告了一项涉及 HIFT 期间受伤的系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。如果个别研究涉及年龄≥18 岁的个体,并提供了 HIFT 期间损伤流行率和/或损伤率的定量数据,则选择进行综述。共有 28 项研究涉及 11089 名参与者符合纳入标准。个体研究之间存在很大的变异性,损伤流行率范围为 12%至 74%,损伤率范围为 0.04 至 18.90 例/1000 小时训练。荟萃分析表明,总体损伤流行率为 36%(95%置信区间[95%CI] = 32-41%),总体损伤率为 4.3 例/1000 小时(95%CI = 3.35-5.23)。五项可用前瞻性队列研究中的损伤率要高得多,为 9.9 例/1000 小时(95%CI = 3.3-16.4)。受伤最常见的解剖部位(占总受伤的百分比)是肩部(26%)、背部/脊柱(26%)、膝盖(14%)、手腕/手/手指(12%)、手臂/肘部(10%)和脚踝/脚(6%)。鉴于前瞻性研究中的损伤率更高,这些研究可能更有效地随着时间的推移跟踪损伤,因此需要更多前瞻性设计的研究,才能适当量化 HIFT 期间的损伤率。

相似文献

1
Injuries During High-Intensity Functional Training: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高强度功能性训练中的损伤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Spec Oper Med. 2022 Spring;22(1):121-129. doi: 10.55460/G29P-I0AU.
2
Injuries During High-Intensity Functional Training.高强度功能性训练中的损伤。
J Spec Oper Med. 2021 Winter;21(4):112-115. doi: 10.55460/K817-9GWY.
3
Epidemiology of High Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) injuries in Brazil.巴西高强度功能性训练(HIFT)损伤的流行病学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 5;17(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03424-7.
4
Injuries sustained during high intensity interval training: are modern fitness trends contributing to increased injury rates?高强度间歇训练期间遭受的损伤:现代健身趋势是否导致了损伤率的增加?
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Jul;59(7):1206-1212. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09407-6. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Retrospective Study of Risk Factors and the Prevalence of Injuries in HIFT.回顾性研究 HIFT 中的危险因素和损伤发生率。
Int J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;41(3):168-174. doi: 10.1055/a-1062-6551. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Injury Surveillance During Competitive Functional Fitness Racing Events.竞技功能性健身竞赛活动中的损伤监测
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Feb 1;13(6):197-205. doi: 10.70252/CDZF5022. eCollection 2020.
7
The Benefits of High-Intensity Functional Training Fitness Programs for Military Personnel.高强度功能性训练健身计划对军事人员的益处。
Mil Med. 2016 Nov;181(11):e1508-e1514. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00503.
8
Epidemiology of Injuries in Women Playing Competitive Team Bat-or-Stick Sports: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.女性参与竞技团体棒或棍类运动的损伤流行病学:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2018 Mar;48(3):617-640. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0815-y.
9
A systematic review of injuries in gymnastics.对体操运动损伤的系统评价。
Phys Sportsmed. 2019 Feb;47(1):96-121. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1527646. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
The Epidemiology of Injuries Across the Weight-Training Sports.举重运动项目中损伤的流行病学。
Sports Med. 2017 Mar;47(3):479-501. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0575-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Variability in exercise is linked to improved age-related dysfunctions: A potential role for the constrained-disorder principle-based second-generation artificial intelligence system.运动的变异性与改善年龄相关功能障碍有关:基于受限-无序原则的第二代人工智能系统的潜在作用。
Res Sq. 2023 Dec 19:rs.3.rs-3671709. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3671709/v1.