Sehmi Kawaldip, Wale Janet L
International Alliance of Patients' Organizations, London, United Kingdom.
HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group (PCIG), Brunswick, VIC, Australia.
Front Med Technol. 2022 Feb 24;4:810456. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.810456. eCollection 2022.
The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted global knowledge about, but lack of equitable access to, life-changing medicines, and other innovative medical products by populations in African low and middle income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other international non-profit foundations and organizations are constantly striving to address inequity. In the 1970s, WHO initiated a regularly updated essential medicines list, together with the concept of national medicines policies (NMPs) to ensure access and availability, affordability, rational, and effective use of medicines which are considered essential in addressing predominant population health issues and disease burden. We studied the NMPs of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe to highlight some of the important issues that these countries experience in the safe and effective use of medical products. Thailand is an example of how health technology assessment (HTA) can provide a country with an internationally supported, clearly defined and transparent process to broaden access to medicines and services. These medical services can add considerable value in accordance with local values and priorities. Involvement of civil society adds democratic legitimacy to such processes. Community health workers and patient advocacy groups are important in raising awareness and knowledge of safety issues and the effective use of quality medicines. They can apply pressure for increased funding to improve access to healthcare. Medicines and services that contribute to supported self-care are of benefit in any setting. Joint efforts across African countries such as with the African Medicines Agency are important in addressing some of the major health issues.
新冠疫情凸显了非洲低收入和中等收入国家民众对改变生活的药品及其他创新医疗产品的全球认知,但同时也暴露出这些产品在获取上缺乏公平性的问题。世界卫生组织(WHO)以及其他国际非营利基金会和组织一直在努力解决这种不公平现象。20世纪70年代,WHO发起了一份定期更新的基本药物清单,并提出了国家药物政策(NMPs)的概念,以确保获取和供应、可负担性、合理且有效地使用那些被认为对解决主要的民众健康问题和疾病负担至关重要的药物。我们研究了加纳、南非、乌干达和津巴布韦的国家药物政策,以突出这些国家在安全有效使用医疗产品方面所面临的一些重要问题。泰国是一个例子,说明卫生技术评估(HTA)如何能够为一个国家提供一个得到国际支持、明确界定且透明的程序,以扩大药品和服务的获取范围。这些医疗服务能够根据当地价值观和优先事项增加可观的价值。民间社会的参与为这类程序增添了民主合法性。社区卫生工作者和患者倡导团体对于提高对安全问题以及优质药物有效使用的认识和知识非常重要。他们可以施加压力以增加资金投入,改善医疗保健的获取。有助于支持自我护理的药品和服务在任何环境下都有益处。非洲国家之间的共同努力,比如与非洲药品管理局的合作,对于解决一些主要的健康问题至关重要。