Suppr超能文献

非洲国家药品政策在患者参与和卫生技术评估方面的进展

Where National Medicines Policies Have Taken Us With Patient Involvement and Health Technology Assessment in Africa.

作者信息

Sehmi Kawaldip, Wale Janet L

机构信息

International Alliance of Patients' Organizations, London, United Kingdom.

HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group (PCIG), Brunswick, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Med Technol. 2022 Feb 24;4:810456. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.810456. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted global knowledge about, but lack of equitable access to, life-changing medicines, and other innovative medical products by populations in African low and middle income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other international non-profit foundations and organizations are constantly striving to address inequity. In the 1970s, WHO initiated a regularly updated essential medicines list, together with the concept of national medicines policies (NMPs) to ensure access and availability, affordability, rational, and effective use of medicines which are considered essential in addressing predominant population health issues and disease burden. We studied the NMPs of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe to highlight some of the important issues that these countries experience in the safe and effective use of medical products. Thailand is an example of how health technology assessment (HTA) can provide a country with an internationally supported, clearly defined and transparent process to broaden access to medicines and services. These medical services can add considerable value in accordance with local values and priorities. Involvement of civil society adds democratic legitimacy to such processes. Community health workers and patient advocacy groups are important in raising awareness and knowledge of safety issues and the effective use of quality medicines. They can apply pressure for increased funding to improve access to healthcare. Medicines and services that contribute to supported self-care are of benefit in any setting. Joint efforts across African countries such as with the African Medicines Agency are important in addressing some of the major health issues.

摘要

新冠疫情凸显了非洲低收入和中等收入国家民众对改变生活的药品及其他创新医疗产品的全球认知,但同时也暴露出这些产品在获取上缺乏公平性的问题。世界卫生组织(WHO)以及其他国际非营利基金会和组织一直在努力解决这种不公平现象。20世纪70年代,WHO发起了一份定期更新的基本药物清单,并提出了国家药物政策(NMPs)的概念,以确保获取和供应、可负担性、合理且有效地使用那些被认为对解决主要的民众健康问题和疾病负担至关重要的药物。我们研究了加纳、南非、乌干达和津巴布韦的国家药物政策,以突出这些国家在安全有效使用医疗产品方面所面临的一些重要问题。泰国是一个例子,说明卫生技术评估(HTA)如何能够为一个国家提供一个得到国际支持、明确界定且透明的程序,以扩大药品和服务的获取范围。这些医疗服务能够根据当地价值观和优先事项增加可观的价值。民间社会的参与为这类程序增添了民主合法性。社区卫生工作者和患者倡导团体对于提高对安全问题以及优质药物有效使用的认识和知识非常重要。他们可以施加压力以增加资金投入,改善医疗保健的获取。有助于支持自我护理的药品和服务在任何环境下都有益处。非洲国家之间的共同努力,比如与非洲药品管理局的合作,对于解决一些主要的健康问题至关重要。

相似文献

3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Rational use of medicines - Indian perspective!药品的合理使用——印度视角!
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S47-8. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150684.
8
Value added medicines: what value repurposed medicines might bring to society?增值药物:重新利用的药物可能给社会带来什么价值?
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Dec 23;5(1):1264717. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1264717. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

8
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE HTAsiaLINK NETWORK AND ITS KEY DETERMINANTS OF SUCCESS.HTAsiaLINK 网络的历史发展及其成功的关键因素。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(3):260-266. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000223. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
WHY PATIENTS SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.为什么患者应该参与卫生技术评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(1):1-4. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000241. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health.全民健康覆盖、优先事项设定与健康权
Lancet. 2017 Aug 12;390(10095):712-714. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30931-5. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验