Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health.
作者信息
Rumbold Benedict, Baker Rachel, Ferraz Octavio, Hawkes Sarah, Krubiner Carleigh, Littlejohns Peter, Norheim Ole F, Pegram Thomas, Rid Annette, Venkatapuram Sridhar, Voorhoeve Alex, Wang Daniel, Weale Albert, Wilson James, Yamin Alicia Ely, Hunt Paul
机构信息
Department of Philosophy, University College London, London, UK.
Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
出版信息
Lancet. 2017 Aug 12;390(10095):712-714. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30931-5. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health.全民健康覆盖、优先事项设定与健康权
Lancet. 2017 Aug 12;390(10095):712-714. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30931-5. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2
Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services.全民健康覆盖的伦理优先事项设定：卫生服务公平分配决策中的挑战。
BMC Med. 2016 May 11;14:75. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4.
3
Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage.伦理视角：通往全民健康覆盖道路上的五个不可接受的权衡取舍。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Oct 11;4(11):711-4. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.184.
4
Is universal health coverage the practical expression of the right to health care?全民健康覆盖是医疗保健权的切实体现吗？
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014 Feb 24;14:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-14-3.
5
Universal Health Coverage - The Critical Importance of Global Solidarity and Good Governance Comment on "Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage".全民健康覆盖——全球团结和良好治理的至关重要性 评“道德视角：全民健康覆盖道路上的五个不可接受的权衡取舍”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Sep 1;5(9):557-559. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.61.
6
Building from the HIV Response toward Universal Health Coverage.从艾滋病应对迈向全民健康覆盖。
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 16;13(8):e1002083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002083. eCollection 2016 Aug.
7
The emergence of a global right to health norm--the unresolved case of universal access to quality emergency obstetric care.全球健康权规范的出现——普及优质急诊产科护理这一未决案例。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014 Feb 27;14:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-14-4.
8
Priority-setting for achieving universal health coverage.实现全民健康覆盖的优先事项设定。
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jun 1;94(6):462-7. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.155721. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
9
The undernutrition epidemic: an urgent health priority.营养不良流行：一项紧迫的卫生优先事项。
Lancet. 2009 Oct 31;374(9700):1473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61881-X.
10
Why accountability matters for universal health coverage and meeting the SDGs.为何问责制对全民健康覆盖和实现可持续发展目标至关重要。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 16;393(10176):1082-1084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30434-9. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
引用本文的文献
1
Revisiting a decade of inequality in healthcare financial burden in Cambodia, 2009-19: trends, determinants and decomposition.重新审视柬埔寨十年来医疗保健财务负担不平等状况，2009-19 年：趋势、决定因素和分解。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Sep 30;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02257-6.
2
Litigation in access to universal health coverage for children and adolescents in Brazil.巴西争取普及儿童和青少年全民健康覆盖的诉讼活动。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 25;12:1402648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402648. eCollection 2024.
3
Understanding the factors affecting global political priority for controlling sexually transmitted infections: a qualitative policy analysis.理解影响全球控制性传播感染政策优先级的因素：一项定性政策分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jan 23;9(1):e014237. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014237.
4
New strides towards fair processes for financing universal health coverage.在为全民健康覆盖筹集资金的公平进程方面取得新进展。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i5-i8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad065.
5
Civil society and medical product access in Africa: Lessons from COVID-19.非洲的民间社会与医疗产品获取：来自新冠疫情的经验教训
Front Med Technol. 2023 Feb 7;5:1091425. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1091425. eCollection 2023.
6
What can implementation science offer civil society in their efforts to drive rights-based health reform?实施科学能为民间社会在努力推动基于权利的卫生改革方面提供什么？
Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Jan 17;8(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00284-4.
7
Challenges to the right to health in sub-Saharan Africa: reflections on inequities in access to dialysis for patients with end-stage kidney failure.撒哈拉以南非洲地区健康权面临的挑战：对终末期肾衰竭患者透析机会不均等的思考。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 5;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01715-3.
8
Where National Medicines Policies Have Taken Us With Patient Involvement and Health Technology Assessment in Africa.非洲国家药品政策在患者参与和卫生技术评估方面的进展
Front Med Technol. 2022 Feb 24;4:810456. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.810456. eCollection 2022.
9
Integrating health technology assessment and the right to health: a qualitative content analysis of procedural values in South African judicial decisions.将健康技术评估与健康权相结合：南非司法判决中程序价值的定性内容分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 May 12;37(5):644-654. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab132.
10
Policy exclusion or confusion? Perspectives on universal health coverage for migrants and refugees in South Africa.政策排斥还是混淆？南非对移民和难民全民健康覆盖的观点。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Sep 9;36(8):1292-1306. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab038.
本文引用的文献
1
The International Right to Health: What Does It Mean in Legal Practice and How Can It Affect Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage?国际健康权：它在法律实践中意味着什么，以及如何影响全民健康覆盖的优先事项设定？
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Jan 2;2(1):23-31. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1124167.
2
Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage.在全民健康覆盖的道路上做出公平选择。
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Jan 2;2(1):5-7. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2015.1111288.
3
Interpreting the International Right to Health in a Human Rights-Based Approach to Health.基于人权的健康视角下对国际健康权的解读。
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):109-130.
4
A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair.挪威一项关于确定优先事项的新提议：公开且公平。
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
5
6
Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis.医疗保健中的优先事项设定指南（GPS-Health）：纳入成本效益分析未涵盖的公平标准。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014 Aug 29;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-12-18. eCollection 2014.
7
Why and how is health a human right?为什么以及健康如何成为一项人权？
Lancet. 2008 Dec 13;372(9655):2010. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61784-5.
8
Searching for a threshold, not setting one: the role of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.寻找阈值，而非设定阈值：英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的作用
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Jan;12(1):56-8. doi: 10.1258/135581907779497567.
9
World Health Assembly concludes: adopts key resolutions affecting global public health.世界卫生大会闭幕：通过影响全球公共卫生的关键决议。
Indian J Med Sci. 2005 May;59(5):225-32.
10
Why health equity?为何要关注健康公平？
Health Econ. 2002 Dec;11(8):659-66. doi: 10.1002/hec.762.
Zotero 插件