• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

编辑不当行为:网络掠夺性期刊的案例

Editorial misconduct: the case of online predatory journals.

作者信息

Gallent Torres Cinta

机构信息

University of the Balearic Islands, Spain.

University of Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2022 Feb 24;8(3):e08999. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08999. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08999
PMID:35284674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8904217/
Abstract

The number of publishers that offer academics, researchers, and postgraduate students the opportunity to publish articles and book chapters quickly and easily has been growing steadily in recent years. This can be ascribed to a variety of factors, e.g., increasing Internet use, the Open Access movement, academic pressure to publish, and the emergence of publishers with questionable interests that cast doubt on the reliability and the scientific rigor of the articles they publish. All this has transformed the scholarly and scientific publishing scene and has opened the door to the appearance of journals whose editorial procedures differ from those of legitimate journals. These publishers are called , because their manuscript publishing process deviates from the norm (very short publication times, non-existent or low-quality peer-review, surprisingly low rejection rates, etc.). The object of this article is to spell out the editorial practices of these journals to make them easier to spot and thus to alert researchers who are unfamiliar with them. It therefore reviews and highlights the work of other authors who have for years been calling attention to how these journals operate, to their unique features and behaviors, and to the consequences of publishing in them. The most relevant conclusions reached include the scant awareness of the existence of such journals (especially by researchers still lacking experience), the enormous harm they cause to authors' reputations, the harm they cause researchers taking part in promotion or professional accreditation procedures, and the feelings of chagrin and helplessness that come from seeing one's work printed in low-quality journals. Future comprehensive research on why authors decide to submit valuable articles to these journals is also needed. This paper therefore discusses the size of this phenomenon and how to distinguish those journals from ethical journals.

摘要

近年来,为学术人员、研究人员和研究生提供快速便捷地发表文章及书籍章节机会的出版商数量一直在稳步增长。这可归因于多种因素,例如互联网使用的增加、开放获取运动、发表文章的学术压力,以及一些利益存疑的出版商的出现,这些出版商对其所发表文章的可靠性和科学严谨性令人质疑。所有这些都改变了学术和科学出版的局面,并为编辑程序与正规期刊不同的期刊的出现打开了大门。这些出版商被称为 ,因为他们的稿件出版过程偏离常规(出版时间极短、同行评审不存在或质量低下、拒稿率出奇地低等)。本文的目的是阐明这些期刊的编辑做法,以便更容易识别它们,从而提醒不熟悉它们的研究人员。因此,本文回顾并强调了其他作者多年来一直关注这些期刊如何运作、它们的独特特征和行为以及在这些期刊上发表文章的后果的工作。得出的最相关结论包括对这类期刊存在的认识不足(尤其是经验不足的研究人员)、它们对作者声誉造成的巨大损害、它们对参与晋升或专业认证程序的研究人员造成的损害,以及看到自己的作品发表在低质量期刊上所产生的懊恼和无助感。未来还需要对作者为何决定向这些期刊提交有价值文章进行全面研究。因此,本文讨论了这一现象的规模以及如何将这些期刊与符合道德规范的期刊区分开来。

相似文献

1
Editorial misconduct: the case of online predatory journals.编辑不当行为:网络掠夺性期刊的案例
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 24;8(3):e08999. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08999. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
3
[The different models of scientific journals].[科学期刊的不同模式]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Dec 8;3(4). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.454. eCollection 2023 Dec 31.
4
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.在掠夺性期刊上发表文章的伦理问题。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):279-284. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030.
5
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis.黑名单和白名单应对掠夺性出版:横断面比较和主题分析。
mBio. 2019 Jun 4;10(3):e00411-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00411-19.
6
Avoiding predatory publishing for early career neurosurgeons: what should you know before you submit?避免掠夺性出版:投稿前你应该知道什么?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04546-9. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
7
Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing.学术噩梦:掠夺性出版。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jul;10(4):392-394. doi: 10.1002/ase.1671. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
8
Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication.开放获取蓬勃发展时代的尽职调查:选择声誉良好的期刊进行发表
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Nov 15;364(21). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx206.
9
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
10
[Predatory journals in Orthopedics and Traumatology].[骨科与创伤领域的掠夺性期刊]
Acta Ortop Mex. 2024 Jan-Feb;38(1):22-28.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the ethical limits of claimed scientific authorship? a case report of relevance.所谓科学著作权的道德界限是什么?一份相关病例报告。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025 Mar 17;82(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s00018-025-05650-8.
2
[Predatory journals: What are they and how to avoid them?].[掠夺性期刊:它们是什么以及如何避免?]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jan 8;62(1):1-8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10278149.
3
Effect of an educational intervention on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers at King Hussein Cancer Center towards predatory publishers.教育干预对侯赛因国王癌症中心医护人员对掠夺性出版商的知识、态度和实践的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 22;23(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04312-2.
4
A bibliometric analysis of research on tourism content marketing: Background knowledge and thematic evolution.旅游内容营销研究的文献计量分析:背景知识与主题演变
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 4;9(2):e13487. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13487. eCollection 2023 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
[Predatory journals: A real threat for medical research. 1. Identify these journals and understand how they work].[掠夺性期刊:医学研究的真正威胁。1. 识别这些期刊并了解其运作方式]
Rev Med Interne. 2021 Jun;42(6):421-426. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2021.03.329. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Predatory journals: a different pandemic.掠夺性期刊:另一场大流行。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Apr;51(4):516-518. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04918-4. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence.掠夺性期刊:无定义,无辩护。
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):210-212. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y.
4
Revisiting the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing.重新审视“掠夺性开放获取出版”这一术语。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 8;34(13):e99. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e99.
5
Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey.研究者在掠夺性期刊上发表论文的知识和动机:一项调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e026516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516.
6
[Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity].[剽窃与掠夺性期刊:对科学诚信的威胁]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan;90(1):57.e1-57.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
What is a predatory journal? A scoping review.什么是掠夺性期刊?一项范围综述。
F1000Res. 2018 Jul 4;7:1001. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15256.2. eCollection 2018.
8
[Predatory journals: a new threat to scientific publications].[掠夺性期刊:科学出版物面临的新威胁]
Rev Med Chil. 2018 Feb;146(2):206-212. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000200206.
9
Problems and challenges of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊的问题与挑战。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Sep;32(9):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15039. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Invitation to Speak at a Conference: The Tempting Technique Adopted by Predatory Conferences' Organizers.会议演讲邀请:掠夺性会议组织者采用的诱人技巧。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):975-979. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0038-0. Epub 2018 Mar 8.