• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你将获得的和你将会获得的:测试动词时态是否会影响跨期选择。

What you are getting and what you will be getting: Testing whether verb tense affects intertemporal choices.

机构信息

Marketing Group.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct;151(10):2342-2395. doi: 10.1037/xge0001192. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1037/xge0001192
PMID:35286117
Abstract

Prior research has shown that the way information is communicated can impact decisions, consistent with some forms of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis that language shapes thought. In particular, language structure-specifically the form of verb tense in that language-can predict savings behaviors among speakers of different languages. We test the causal effect of language structure encountered during financial decision-making, by manipulating the verb tense (within a single language) used to communicate intertemporal tradeoffs. We find that verb tense significantly shift choices between options, owing to tense-based inferences about timing. However, the spontaneous use of verb tense when making choices occurs only in the complete absence of other timing cues and is eliminated if even ambiguous or nondiagnostic time cues are present, although prompted timing inferences persist. We test between multiple competing accounts for how verb tense differentially impacts timing inferences and choices. We find evidence for a cue-based account, such that the presence of other cues blocks the spontaneous use of verb tense in making intertemporal decisions, consistent with the "Good Enough" proposal in psycholinguistics. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

先前的研究表明,信息的传达方式会影响决策,这与萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说的某些形式一致,即语言塑造思维。具体来说,语言结构——特别是语言中动词时态的形式——可以预测不同语言使用者的储蓄行为。我们通过操纵在金融决策过程中遇到的语言结构中的动词时态(在一种语言内)来测试语言结构的因果效应。我们发现动词时态会 显著改变选项之间的选择,这是由于基于时态的关于时间的推断。然而,在做出选择时,动词时态的自发使用仅在完全没有其他时间线索的情况下发生,如果存在甚至是模糊的或非诊断性的时间线索,这种情况就会消失,尽管提示的时间推断仍然存在。我们测试了多个相互竞争的解释,说明动词时态如何不同地影响时间推断和选择。我们发现,有证据表明,基于线索的解释,即其他线索的存在会阻止动词时态在进行跨时间决策时的自发使用,这与心理语言学中的“足够好”建议一致。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
What you are getting and what you will be getting: Testing whether verb tense affects intertemporal choices.你将获得的和你将会获得的:测试动词时态是否会影响跨期选择。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct;151(10):2342-2395. doi: 10.1037/xge0001192. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
A preliminary comparison of verb tense production in Spanish speakers with expressive restrictions.对有表达限制的西班牙语使用者动词时态产出的初步比较。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Oct;25(10):864-80. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.582225. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
3
Comparing generativist and constructivist accounts of the use of the past tense form in early child Japanese.比较生成主义和建构主义对日本幼儿过去时形式使用的解释。
J Child Lang. 2016 Nov;43(6):1365-84. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000732. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
4
Why reference to the past is difficult for agrammatic speakers.为什么对于语法缺失的说话者来说,提及过去是困难的。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Apr;27(4):244-63. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.751626. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
5
Salience in Second Language Acquisition: Physical Form, Learner Attention, and Instructional Focus.第二语言习得中的突显:语言形式、学习者注意力与教学重点
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 29;7:1284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01284. eCollection 2016.
6
Distributional learning in English: The effect of verb-specific biases and verb-general semantic mappings on sentence production.英语中的分布学习:动词特定偏向和动词一般语义映射对句子生成的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jan;47(1):113-128. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000814. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Marking of verb tense in the English of preschool English-Mandarin bilingual children: evidence from language development profiles within subgroups on the Singapore English Action Picture Test.新加坡英语动作图片测试中,学前英语-普通话双语儿童英语中动词时态的标记:来自亚组内语言发展概况的证据。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jan;51(1):31-43. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12181. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
8
Sentence reading: do we make use of orthographic cues in homophones?句子阅读:我们是否利用同音异形词中的正字法线索?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Sep;105(1):31-56. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00047-0.
9
Do lemmas speak German? A verb position effect in German structural priming.引语会说德语吗?德语结构启动中的动词位置效应。
Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;39(5):1113-30. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12184. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
10
How language shapes prejudice against women: An examination across 45 world languages.语言如何塑造对女性的偏见:对 45 种世界语言的考察。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;119(1):7-22. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000188. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Language and economic behaviour: Future tense use causes less not more temporal discounting.语言与经济行为:将来时态的使用导致更少而非更多的时间贴现。
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0317422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317422. eCollection 2025.
2
Not When But Whether: Modality and Future Time Reference in English and Dutch.何时而非是否:英语和荷兰语中的情态和将来时间参照。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;47(1):e13224. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13224.