• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨越数字鸿沟的建模访问,以满足寻求基于网络的健康信息的交叉群体的需求:全国性调查。

Modeling Access Across the Digital Divide for Intersectional Groups Seeking Web-Based Health Information: National Survey.

机构信息

School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 15;24(3):e32678. doi: 10.2196/32678.

DOI:10.2196/32678
PMID:35289761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8965683/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The digital divide refers to technological disparities based on demographic characteristics (eg, race and ethnicity). Lack of physical access to the internet inhibits online health information seeking (OHIS) and exacerbates health disparities. Research on the digital divide examines where and how people access the internet, whereas research on OHIS investigates how intersectional identities influence OHIS. We combine these perspectives to explicate how unique context-device access pairings operate differently across intersectional identities-particularly racial and ethnic groups-in the domain of OHIS.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine how different types of internet access relate to OHIS for different racial and ethnic groups. We investigate relationships among predisposing characteristics (ie, age, sex, education, and income), internet access (home computer, public computer, work computer, and mobile), health needs, and OHIS.

METHODS

Analysis was conducted using data from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey. Our theoretical model of OHIS explicates the roles of internet access and health needs for racial and ethnic minority groups' OHIS. Participant responses were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Three separate group structural equation modeling models were specified based on Black, Latine, and White self-categorizations.

RESULTS

Overall, predisposing characteristics (ie, age, sex, education, and income) were associated with internet access, health needs, and OHIS; internet access was associated with OHIS; and health needs were associated with OHIS. Home computer and mobile access were most consistently associated with OHIS. Several notable linkages between predisposing characteristics and internet access differed for Black and Latine individuals. Older racial and ethnic minorities tended to access the internet on home and public computers less frequently; home computer access was a stronger predictor of OHIS for White individuals, and mobile access was a stronger predictor of OHIS for non-White individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings necessitate a deeper unpacking of how physical internet access, the foundational and multifaceted level of the digital divide, affects specific racial and ethnic groups and their OHIS. We not only find support for prior work on the digital divide but also surface new insights, including distinct impacts of context-device access pairings for OHIS and several relationships that differ between racial and ethnic groups. As such, we propose interventions with an intersectional approach to access to ameliorate the impact of the digital divide.

摘要

背景

数字鸿沟是指基于人口特征(如种族和族裔)的技术差距。缺乏物理互联网接入会抑制在线健康信息搜索(OHIS),并加剧健康差距。数字鸿沟的研究考察了人们在哪里以及如何访问互联网,而 OHIS 的研究则调查了交叉身份如何影响 OHIS。我们结合这些观点,阐明了在 OHIS 领域,独特的上下文设备访问配对如何在不同的交叉身份(尤其是不同种族和族裔群体)中发挥不同的作用。

目的

本研究旨在研究不同类型的互联网接入与不同种族和族裔群体的 OHIS 之间的关系。我们调查了倾向特征(即年龄、性别、教育和收入)、互联网接入(家庭计算机、公共计算机、工作计算机和移动设备)、健康需求和 OHIS 之间的关系。

方法

分析使用了 2019 年健康信息国家趋势调查的数据。我们的 OHIS 理论模型阐明了互联网接入和健康需求在少数族裔群体 OHIS 中的作用。使用结构方程建模对参与者的回答进行了分析。根据黑人、拉丁裔和白人的自我分类,指定了三个单独的组结构方程模型。

结果

总体而言,倾向特征(即年龄、性别、教育和收入)与互联网接入、健康需求和 OHIS 相关;互联网接入与 OHIS 相关;健康需求与 OHIS 相关。家庭计算机和移动设备访问与 OHIS 的关联最为密切。黑人及拉丁裔个体中,几个与倾向特征和互联网接入相关的显著联系存在差异。年龄较大的少数族裔较少频繁地在家中和公共计算机上访问互联网;家庭计算机接入是白人 OHIS 的更强预测因素,而移动接入是非白人 OHIS 的更强预测因素。

结论

我们的研究结果需要更深入地剖析物理互联网接入(数字鸿沟的基础和多方面层面)如何影响特定的种族和族裔群体及其 OHIS。我们不仅为数字鸿沟的先前研究提供了支持,还提出了新的见解,包括对 OHIS 的上下文设备访问配对的独特影响以及不同种族和族裔群体之间的几个关系。因此,我们提出了具有交叉性的接入干预措施,以减轻数字鸿沟的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/8965683/9c232213227d/jmir_v24i3e32678_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/8965683/3d785b2773cb/jmir_v24i3e32678_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/8965683/9c232213227d/jmir_v24i3e32678_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/8965683/3d785b2773cb/jmir_v24i3e32678_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/8965683/9c232213227d/jmir_v24i3e32678_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling Access Across the Digital Divide for Intersectional Groups Seeking Web-Based Health Information: National Survey.跨越数字鸿沟的建模访问,以满足寻求基于网络的健康信息的交叉群体的需求:全国性调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 15;24(3):e32678. doi: 10.2196/32678.
2
Profiles of a Health Information-Seeking Population and the Current Digital Divide: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2015-2016 California Health Interview Survey.健康信息寻求人群概况与当前数字鸿沟:对2015 - 2016年加利福尼亚健康访谈调查的横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 14;21(5):e11931. doi: 10.2196/11931.
3
Examining First- and Second-Level Digital Divide at the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status: An Analysis of the National Health and Aging Trends Study.考察种族/民族、性别和社会经济地位交叉处的第一级和第二级数字鸿沟:对国家健康与老龄化趋势研究的分析。
Gerontologist. 2024 Sep 1;64(9). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae079.
4
National-Level Disparities in Internet Access Among Low-Income and Black and Hispanic Youth: Current Population Survey.低收入和黑人和西班牙裔青年的国家层面互联网接入差距:当前人口调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 12;23(10):e27723. doi: 10.2196/27723.
5
Urban/Rural Digital Divide Exists in Older Adults: Does It Vary by Racial/Ethnic Groups?老年人中存在城乡数字鸿沟:它在不同种族/族裔群体中是否存在差异?
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 May;41(5):1348-1356. doi: 10.1177/07334648211073605. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Online Health Information Seeking, eHealth Literacy, and Health Behaviors Among Chinese Internet Users: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.中文互联网用户的在线健康信息搜索、电子健康素养和健康行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e54135. doi: 10.2196/54135.
7
The Impact of Accelerated Digitization on Patient Portal Use by Underprivileged Racial Minority Groups During COVID-19: Longitudinal Study.COVID-19 期间加速数字化对贫困少数族裔患者使用患者门户的影响:纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 9;25:e44981. doi: 10.2196/44981.
8
The Intersectional Impact of Race/Ethnicity and Sex on Access to Technology Among Older Adults.种族/民族和性别对老年人获得技术的交叉影响。
Gerontologist. 2023 Aug 24;63(7):1162-1171. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac178.
9
The Digital Divide and Health Disparities in China: Evidence From a National Survey and Policy Implications.中国的数字鸿沟与健康差距:来自全国性调查的证据及政策启示
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 11;19(9):e317. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7786.
10
Internet Use and Access Among Pregnant Women via Computer and Mobile Phone: Implications for Delivery of Perinatal Care.孕妇使用电脑和手机上网情况:对围产期保健服务提供的影响。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 30;3(1):e25. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3347.

引用本文的文献

1
From Traditional to Digital: Examining the Transformation of Sociocultural Barriers and Facilitators in Healthcare Technology Adoption.从传统到数字:审视医疗技术采用中社会文化障碍与促进因素的转变
Res Sq. 2025 Jul 28:rs.3.rs-6995030. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6995030/v1.
2
Coping behaviors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: situational and habitual effects on mental distress with hybrid model analysis.新冠疫情期间的应对行为与心理健康:基于混合模型分析的情境与习惯对心理困扰的影响
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Aug 2;5(1):114. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00263-w.
3
Decomposition and Comparative Analysis of Urban-Rural Disparities in eHealth Literacy Among Chinese University Students: Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of Online Health-Related Information Seeking in France From 2010 to 2017: Results From Nationally Representative Surveys.2010 年至 2017 年法国在线健康相关信息搜索的演变:全国代表性调查结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 14;23(4):e18799. doi: 10.2196/18799.
2
Differences Between Races in Health Information Seeking and Trust Over Time: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional, Pooled Analyses of HINTS Data.种族间健康信息寻求和信任的差异随时间变化:来自 HINTS 数据的横断面、汇总分析的证据。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):84-92. doi: 10.1177/0890117120934609. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Understanding Information Seeking about the Health of Others: Applying the Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking to Proxy Online Health Information Seeking.
中国大学生电子健康素养城乡差异的分解与比较分析:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 26;27:e63671. doi: 10.2196/63671.
4
Online Health Information Seeking, eHealth Literacy, and Health Behaviors Among Chinese Internet Users: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.中文互联网用户的在线健康信息搜索、电子健康素养和健康行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e54135. doi: 10.2196/54135.
5
Utilizing Digital Health Technology to Increase Sexual Health Care Access: Youth Preferences on Self-Collect, Mail-In Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing in a High Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevalence Area.利用数字健康技术增加性健康护理的可及性:在性传播感染高发地区,年轻人对自我采集、邮寄性传播感染检测的偏好。
J Adolesc Health. 2023 Dec;73(6):1002-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
6
Examination of Text Message Plans and Baseline Usage of Families Enrolled in a Text Message Influenza Vaccine Reminder Trial: Survey Study.参与短信流感疫苗提醒试验的家庭的短信套餐及基线使用情况调查:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 30;7:e39576. doi: 10.2196/39576.
7
Mapping Inequities in Digital Health Technology Within the World Health Organization's European Region Using PROGRESS PLUS: Scoping Review.利用 PROGRESS PLUS 绘制世卫组织欧洲区域数字健康技术不平等图谱:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 28;25:e44181. doi: 10.2196/44181.
8
Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations: Qualitative Systematic Review.文化和语言多样化人群中数字健康的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 28;25:e42719. doi: 10.2196/42719.
9
The digital rainbow: Digital determinants of health inequities.数字彩虹:健康不平等的数字决定因素。
Digit Health. 2022 Oct 2;8:20552076221129093. doi: 10.1177/20552076221129093. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
10
Evaluation of Electronic and Pen-and-Paper Formats of the Inventory of Physical Activity Barriers: A Randomized Crossover Study.评估体力活动障碍清单的电子格式和纸笔格式:一项随机交叉研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(8):540-547. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0821. Print 2022 Aug 1.
理解他人健康信息寻求行为:将综合信息寻求模型应用于代理在线健康信息寻求。
J Health Commun. 2020 Feb 1;25(2):126-135. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1716280. Epub 2020 Feb 2.
4
Gender Differences in Self-perception of Health at a Wellness Center.健康中心中健康自我认知的性别差异
Am J Health Behav. 2019 Nov 1;43(6):1129-1135. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.43.6.10.
5
Applying intersectionality theory in health promotion research and practice.将交叉性理论应用于健康促进研究和实践中。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):866-876. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz080.
6
Data Resource Profile: The National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).数据资源简介:美国国立癌症研究所的健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):17-17j. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz083.
7
Online Health Information Seeking and eHealth Literacy Among Patients Attending a Primary Care Clinic in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Survey.香港基层医疗诊所患者的在线健康信息搜索与电子健康素养:一项横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 27;21(3):e10831. doi: 10.2196/10831.
8
The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access.一级数字鸿沟从物理接入方面的不平等转变为物质接入方面的不平等。
New Media Soc. 2019 Feb;21(2):354-375. doi: 10.1177/1461444818797082. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
9
The Digital Divide in Health-Related Technology Use: The Significance of Race/Ethnicity.健康相关技术使用中的数字鸿沟:种族/民族的重要性。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):6-14. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny138.
10
Applying the Modified Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking to Online Health Information Seeking in the Context of India.运用修正后的综合信息寻求模型探究印度背景下的在线健康信息寻求行为。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(6):563-572. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1493058. Epub 2018 Jul 6.