Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jul;26(7):583-590. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02611-2. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) technique is not standardized. An irregular division of the rectum could result in poor functional outcomes and residual diseased mucosa. The aim of the study was to develop a new technique for performing the rectal transection via a laparoscopic approach, and to compare the outcomes of this technique with those of the open surgery IPAA.
This prospective study included all patients who underwent restorative proctectomy (following a previous subtotal colectomy) for ulcerative colitis in October 2017-November 2020. Rectal division was performed using a 30 mm open linear stapler which was applied laparoscopically across the distal rectum. Postoperative and functional outcomes, length of anal stump and completeness of mucosal removal were compared. Only the patients who had their ileostomy reversed by 31 December 2020 and, therefore, a minimum follow-up of 6 months from the ileostomy closure, were included in the analysis of the functional outcomes and quality of life.
There were 207 patients (161 laparoscopic, 46 open). Median age was 43 (18-77) years and 85 patients (41.1%) were male. Major complications (9.3 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.89) including anastomotic leaks (3.7 vs 4.4%, p = 0.84) were similar after laparoscopic and open IPAA. Patients reported a comparable number of bowel movements during the day (6 vs. 7, p = 0.21) and at night (2 vs. 2, p = 0.66), and a similar rate of episodes of incontinence during the previous 6 months (3.7 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.75). The mean Cleveland Global Quality of Life score was also similar (0.79 vs. 0.74, p = 0.35).
Our technique is safe and reproducible, and replicates the results of the open IPAA, while maintaining the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and avoiding any kind of anal manipulation which could result in poor long-term functional outcomes.
腹腔镜回肠贮袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)技术尚未标准化。直肠不规则的分割可能导致功能结果不佳和残留病变黏膜。本研究的目的是开发一种新的腹腔镜直肠横断技术,并将其与开放手术 IPAA 的结果进行比较。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 2017 年 10 月至 2020 年 11 月期间因溃疡性结肠炎行直肠切除吻合术(先前行次全结肠切除术)的所有患者。直肠分割采用 30mm 开放式直线吻合器完成,通过腹腔镜应用于远端直肠。比较术后和功能结果、肛管残端长度和黏膜切除的完整性。只有在 2020 年 12 月 31 日之前完成回肠造口逆转手术的患者(因此,从回肠造口关闭开始至少有 6 个月的随访),才纳入功能结果和生活质量分析。
共纳入 207 例患者(腹腔镜 161 例,开放手术 46 例)。中位年龄为 43(18-77)岁,85 例(41.1%)为男性。腹腔镜和开放 IPAA 后主要并发症(9.3%与 8.7%,p=0.89)相似,包括吻合口漏(3.7%与 4.4%,p=0.84)。患者报告白天(6 次与 7 次,p=0.21)和夜间(2 次与 2 次,p=0.66)的排便次数相似,前 6 个月失禁发作的发生率也相似(3.7%与 4.3%,p=0.75)。克利夫兰全球生活质量评分也相似(0.79 与 0.74,p=0.35)。
我们的技术安全且可重复,与开放 IPAA 的结果相似,同时保持微创外科的优势,并避免任何可能导致长期功能结果不佳的肛门操作。