Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Cardiovascular Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
J Med Virol. 2022 Jul;94(7):3184-3191. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27724. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon-beta (INF-beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID-19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF-beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF-beta combinations for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. It was a single-center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF-beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF-beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in-hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in-hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0-11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5-12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.
法匹拉韦(FVP)、洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/RTV)和干扰素-β(INF-β)被认为是 COVID-19 的潜在治疗方法。我们研究了 FVP 和 INF-β 与 LPV/RTV 和 INF-β 联合治疗 SARS-CoV-2 的疗效和安全性。这是一项单中心随机临床试验。合格的患者被随机分为接受 FVP 加 INF-β 与 LPV/RTV 加 INF-β。主要终点是随机分组后七天的病毒清除率。还测量了 ICU 入院、住院时间(LOS)、住院死亡率和不良事件的发生率。该试验在伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT20200506047323N3)注册。患者被随机分配到 FVP(n=33)和 LPV/RTV(n=33)组。第 7 天的病毒清除率在 FVP(31.1%)和 LPV/RTV 组(16.1%)之间无显著差异。FVP 组(分别为 12.5%和 6.3%)和 LPV/RTV 组(分别为 19.4%和 19.4%)的 ICU 入院率和住院死亡率相似。医院的中位 LOS 也无差异(FVP 组为 6.8 天[四分位距;IQR=5.0-11.0],LPV/RTV 组为 8.0 天[IQR=5.5-12.5])(p=0.140)。FVP 组和 LPV/RTV 组分别有 25.0%和 32.3%的患者发生不良反应。与 LPV/RTV 联合治疗方案相比,FVP 联合治疗方案并未显示出更高的疗效。然而,两种治疗方案的不良反应谱均较轻。