Liao JunHua, Liu LunXin, Duan HaiHan, Huang YunZhi, Zhou LiangXue, Chen LiangYin, Wang ChaoHua
Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Mar 16;10(3):e28880. doi: 10.2196/28880.
It is hard to distinguish cerebral aneurysms from overlapping vessels in 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images due to these images' lack of spatial information.
The aims of this study were to (1) construct a deep learning diagnostic system to improve the ability to detect posterior communicating artery aneurysms on 2D DSA images and (2) validate the efficiency of the deep learning diagnostic system in 2D DSA aneurysm detection.
We proposed a 2-stage detection system. First, we established the region localization stage to automatically locate specific detection regions of raw 2D DSA sequences. Second, in the intracranial aneurysm detection stage, we constructed a bi-input+RetinaNet+convolutional long short-term memory (C-LSTM) framework to compare its performance for aneurysm detection with that of 3 existing frameworks. Each of the frameworks had a 5-fold cross-validation scheme. The receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve (AUC) value, mean average precision, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used to assess the abilities of different frameworks.
A total of 255 patients with posterior communicating artery aneurysms and 20 patients without aneurysms were included in this study. The best AUC values of the RetinaNet, RetinaNet+C-LSTM, bi-input+RetinaNet, and bi-input+RetinaNet+C-LSTM frameworks were 0.95, 0.96, 0.92, and 0.97, respectively. The mean sensitivities of the RetinaNet, RetinaNet+C-LSTM, bi-input+RetinaNet, and bi-input+RetinaNet+C-LSTM frameworks and human experts were 89% (range 67.02%-98.43%), 88% (range 65.76%-98.06%), 87% (range 64.53%-97.66%), 89% (range 67.02%-98.43%), and 90% (range 68.30%-98.77%), respectively. The mean specificities of the RetinaNet, RetinaNet+C-LSTM, bi-input+RetinaNet, and bi-input+RetinaNet+C-LSTM frameworks and human experts were 80% (range 56.34%-94.27%), 89% (range 67.02%-98.43%), 86% (range 63.31%-97.24%), 93% (range 72.30%-99.56%), and 90% (range 68.30%-98.77%), respectively. The mean accuracies of the RetinaNet, RetinaNet+C-LSTM, bi-input+RetinaNet, and bi-input+RetinaNet+C-LSTM frameworks and human experts were 84.50% (range 69.57%-93.97%), 88.50% (range 74.44%-96.39%), 86.50% (range 71.97%-95.22%), 91% (range 77.63%-97.72%), and 90% (range 76.34%-97.21%), respectively.
According to our results, more spatial and temporal information can help improve the performance of the frameworks. Therefore, the bi-input+RetinaNet+C-LSTM framework had the best performance when compared to that of the other frameworks. Our study demonstrates that our system can assist physicians in detecting intracranial aneurysms on 2D DSA images.
二维数字减影血管造影(DSA)图像缺乏空间信息,因此很难将脑动脉瘤与重叠血管区分开来。
本研究的目的是:(1)构建深度学习诊断系统,以提高在二维DSA图像上检测后交通动脉瘤的能力;(2)验证深度学习诊断系统在二维DSA动脉瘤检测中的效率。
我们提出了一个两阶段检测系统。首先,我们建立区域定位阶段,以自动定位原始二维DSA序列的特定检测区域。其次,在颅内动脉瘤检测阶段,我们构建了一个双输入+RetinaNet+卷积长短期记忆(C-LSTM)框架,以将其动脉瘤检测性能与3个现有框架的性能进行比较。每个框架都有一个五折交叉验证方案。使用受试者工作特征曲线、曲线下面积(AUC)值、平均精度、灵敏度、特异性和准确率来评估不同框架的能力。
本研究共纳入255例后交通动脉瘤患者和20例无动脉瘤患者。RetinaNet、RetinaNet+C-LSTM、双输入+RetinaNet和双输入+RetinaNet+C-LSTM框架的最佳AUC值分别为0.95、0.96、0.92和0.97。RetinaNet、RetinaNet+C-LSTM、双输入+RetinaNet和双输入+RetinaNet+C-LSTM框架以及人类专家的平均灵敏度分别为89%(范围67.02%-98.43%)、88%(范围65.76%-98.06%)、87%(范围64.53%-97.66%)、89%(范围67.02%-98.43%)和90%(范围68.30%-98.77%)。RetinaNet、RetinaNet+C-LSTM、双输入+RetinaNet和双输入+RetinaNet+C-LSTM框架以及人类专家的平均特异性分别为80%(范围56.34%-94.27%)、89%(范围67.02%-98.43%)、86%(范围63.31%-97.24%)、93%(范围72.30%-99.56%)和90%(范围68.30%-98.77%)。RetinaNet、RetinaNet+C-LSTM、双输入+RetinaNet和双输入+RetinaNet+C-LSTM框架以及人类专家的平均准确率分别为84.50%(范围69.57%-93.97%)、88.50%(范围74.44%-96.39%)、86.50%(范围71.97%-95.22%)、91%(范围77.63%-97.72%)和90%(范围76.34%-97.21%)。
根据我们的结果,更多的空间和时间信息有助于提高框架的性能。因此,与其他框架相比,双输入+RetinaNet+C-LSTM框架具有最佳性能。我们的研究表明,我们的系统可以帮助医生在二维DSA图像上检测颅内动脉瘤。