Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Aug;154(2):273-283. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4225_20.
The 2018 revised International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging of cervical cancer has brought about a paradigm shift by offering the option of adding imaging and pathology to clinical staging. This makes it applicable to all types of resource situations across geographies with implications for all stakeholders, including gynaecologists, gynaecologic oncologists, radiologists, pathologists and radiation and medical oncologists. The new staging classification has more granularity, with three sub-stages of stage IB and a new category of stage IIIC for all cases with lymph node (LN) involvement. The major limitations of clinical staging were inaccurate assessment of tumour size and inability to assess pelvic and para-aortic LNs with the limited investigations permitted by FIGO to change the stage. This resulted in understaging of stages IB-III, and overstaging of stage IIIB, which has been largely overcome by incorporating imaging findings. Although any imaging modality can be used, magnetic resonance imaging appears to be the best imaging modality for early-stage disease owing to its better soft-tissue resolution. However, the use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography or ultrasonography are also feasible options, depending on the availability and resources. But wherever pathological evaluation is possible, it supersedes clinical and radiological findings.
2018 年修订的国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)宫颈癌分期系统通过将影像学和病理学检查纳入临床分期,带来了一种模式转变。这使得该分期系统适用于所有地理区域的各种资源情况,对包括妇科医生、妇科肿瘤医生、放射科医生、病理学家以及放射治疗和内科肿瘤医生在内的所有利益相关者都有影响。新的分期分类更加细致,IB 期分为三个亚期,对于所有淋巴结(LN)受累的病例,均有一个新的 IIIC 期类别。临床分期的主要局限性在于肿瘤大小的评估不准确,并且无法评估骨盆和主动脉旁 LN,而 FIGO 允许进行的有限检查无法改变分期。这导致 IB 期-III 期分期不足,以及 IIIB 期分期过度,而通过纳入影像学发现,这在很大程度上得到了克服。虽然任何影像学方法都可以使用,但由于其更好的软组织分辨率,磁共振成像似乎是早期疾病的最佳影像学方法。然而,根据可用性和资源,使用增强型计算机断层扫描或超声也是可行的选择。但是,只要有可能进行病理评估,就应优先采用病理评估结果,而不是临床和影像学发现。