• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订版宫颈癌 FIGO 分期系统的意义。

Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Res. 2021 Aug;154(2):273-283. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4225_20.

DOI:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4225_20
PMID:35295012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131753/
Abstract

The 2018 revised International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging of cervical cancer has brought about a paradigm shift by offering the option of adding imaging and pathology to clinical staging. This makes it applicable to all types of resource situations across geographies with implications for all stakeholders, including gynaecologists, gynaecologic oncologists, radiologists, pathologists and radiation and medical oncologists. The new staging classification has more granularity, with three sub-stages of stage IB and a new category of stage IIIC for all cases with lymph node (LN) involvement. The major limitations of clinical staging were inaccurate assessment of tumour size and inability to assess pelvic and para-aortic LNs with the limited investigations permitted by FIGO to change the stage. This resulted in understaging of stages IB-III, and overstaging of stage IIIB, which has been largely overcome by incorporating imaging findings. Although any imaging modality can be used, magnetic resonance imaging appears to be the best imaging modality for early-stage disease owing to its better soft-tissue resolution. However, the use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography or ultrasonography are also feasible options, depending on the availability and resources. But wherever pathological evaluation is possible, it supersedes clinical and radiological findings.

摘要

2018 年修订的国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)宫颈癌分期系统通过将影像学和病理学检查纳入临床分期,带来了一种模式转变。这使得该分期系统适用于所有地理区域的各种资源情况,对包括妇科医生、妇科肿瘤医生、放射科医生、病理学家以及放射治疗和内科肿瘤医生在内的所有利益相关者都有影响。新的分期分类更加细致,IB 期分为三个亚期,对于所有淋巴结(LN)受累的病例,均有一个新的 IIIC 期类别。临床分期的主要局限性在于肿瘤大小的评估不准确,并且无法评估骨盆和主动脉旁 LN,而 FIGO 允许进行的有限检查无法改变分期。这导致 IB 期-III 期分期不足,以及 IIIB 期分期过度,而通过纳入影像学发现,这在很大程度上得到了克服。虽然任何影像学方法都可以使用,但由于其更好的软组织分辨率,磁共振成像似乎是早期疾病的最佳影像学方法。然而,根据可用性和资源,使用增强型计算机断层扫描或超声也是可行的选择。但是,只要有可能进行病理评估,就应优先采用病理评估结果,而不是临床和影像学发现。

相似文献

1
Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system.修订版宫颈癌 FIGO 分期系统的意义。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Aug;154(2):273-283. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4225_20.
2
Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages.子宫颈癌的现行国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期及特定分期的治疗
Klin Onkol. 2019 Spring;32(3):224-231. doi: 10.14735/amko2019224.
3
Retrospective study of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes positivity in stage 1A to 2A cervical cancer patients.1A至2A期宫颈癌患者盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性情况的回顾性研究
Med J Malaysia. 2021 Jul;76(4):534-540.
4
The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.宫颈癌 IIIC-r 期 5 年总生存率与 I 期和 II 期无明显差异:单中心回顾性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 27;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07890-w.
5
Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.宫颈癌的腹腔镜手术分期——中国人的初步经验
Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Jan;64(1):49-53. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1996.4527.
6
Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.2018 年国际妇产科联合会宫颈癌分期指南的预后性能。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;134(1):49-57. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003311.
7
Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.重新审视宫颈癌 2018 年 FIGO 分期系统修订版中的腹主动脉旁淋巴结受累情况。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Sep;300(3):675-682. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05232-7. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern.宫颈癌转移性淋巴结的放射学评估,重点在于其浸润模式。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Aug;154(2):383-390. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_212_21.
9
Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review.2018FIGO 期 IIIC 宫颈癌的治疗策略和预后因素:综述。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221086403. doi: 10.1177/15330338221086403.
10
Impact of tumor histology on detection of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastasis with F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in stage IB cervical cancer.肿瘤组织学对 F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描检测 IB 期宫颈癌盆腹腔淋巴结转移的影响。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1351-1354. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000528. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Efficacy of 18F FDG PET-CT in Preoperative Staging of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in Novi Sad, Serbia-A Pilot Study.评估18F FDG PET-CT在塞尔维亚诺维萨德早期宫颈癌术前分期中的疗效——一项试点研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 6;13(23):7445. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237445.
2
Roles of microRNA-486-5p in the diagnosis and the association with clinical symptoms of cervical cancer.miR-486-5p 在宫颈癌的诊断及与临床症状的相关性中的作用。
Biomark Med. 2024;18(20):869-876. doi: 10.1080/17520363.2024.2400963. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
3
Hematological Parameters at Baseline: A Novel Prognostic Factor for Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in South India.基线血液学参数:印度南部接受同步放化疗的宫颈癌患者的一种新型预后因素。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 15;16(9):e69461. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69461. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Staging of Cervical Cancer: What has Changed?子宫颈癌的分期:有哪些变化?
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Aug;74(4):378-381. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-02054-9. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
5
Human Papillomavirus and Associated Cancers: A Review.人乳头瘤病毒及相关癌症:综述。
Viruses. 2024 Apr 26;16(5):680. doi: 10.3390/v16050680.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI, CT, and [F]FDG-PET-CT in detecting lymph node metastases in clinically early-stage cervical cancer - a nationwide Dutch cohort study.MRI、CT和[F]FDG-PET-CT在检测临床早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移中的诊断准确性——一项荷兰全国队列研究
Insights Imaging. 2024 Feb 8;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01589-1.
7
The Impact of Patient Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Surgical Intervention on Survival in a Cohort of Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment for Cervical Cancer.患者特征、风险因素和手术干预对接受宫颈癌新辅助治疗的患者队列生存的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 11;59(12):2147. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122147.
8
An Energy-Efficient Test and Predictive Model for Recurrence After Radiotherapy in Localized Intermediate and Advanced Cervical Cancer Were Created Using Thymidine Kinase 1 in Conjunction with Inflammatory Markers and Tumor Markers.利用胸苷激酶1结合炎症标志物和肿瘤标志物,创建了一种用于局部中晚期宫颈癌放疗后复发的节能检测和预测模型。
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Dec 8;16:5789-5797. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S442389. eCollection 2023.
9
Development of a combined model incorporating clinical characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging features to enhance the predictive value of a prognostic model for locally advanced cervical cancer.结合临床特征和磁共振成像特征的联合模型的开发,以提高局部晚期宫颈癌预后模型的预测价值。
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 22;13:1284493. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1284493. eCollection 2023.
10
Gynaecological Oncology in India: Past, Present and Future.印度的妇科肿瘤学:过去、现在与未来
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;13(Suppl 1):76-80. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01668-7. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement of tumor size in early cervical cancer: an ever-evolving paradigm.早期宫颈癌肿瘤大小的测量:一个不断发展的范例。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Aug;30(8):1215-1223. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001436. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain.2018 年修订版国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)宫颈癌分期:对尚存差距和问题的回顾。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jun;30(6):873-878. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001257. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System of Cervical Cancer for Stage III Patients with a Cohort from China.基于中国队列对2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)宫颈癌分期系统在Ⅲ期患者中的验证
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 25;12:1405-1410. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S239624. eCollection 2020.
4
Influence of the New FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer on Patient Survival: A Retrospective Analysis of 265 Histologically Confirmed Cases with FIGO Stages IA to IIB.FIGO 宫颈癌新分类对患者生存的影响:FIGO 分期 IA 至 IIB 经组织学证实的 265 例病例的回顾性分析。
Oncology. 2020;98(2):91-97. doi: 10.1159/000503149. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors.2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期系统对具有手术风险因素的宫颈癌患者的预后价值。
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jun 13;11:5473-5480. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S203059. eCollection 2019.
6
Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?修订后的 2018 年 FIGO 宫颈癌分期系统是否比之前分期为 IB 期的女性的 2009 年 FIGO 分期系统更具预后价值?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
7
Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.2018 年国际妇产科联合会宫颈癌分期指南的预后性能。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;134(1):49-57. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003311.
8
Role of apparent diffusion coefficient as a biomarker in the evaluation of cervical cancer.表观扩散系数作为生物标志物在宫颈癌评估中的作用。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2019 Jan-Mar;29(1):25-32. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_441_18.
9
Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri.关于2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)子宫颈癌新修订分期的多学科观点。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e40. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e40. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
10
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.FIGO 修订版子宫颈癌分期。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):129-135. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12749. Epub 2019 Jan 17.