Liu Xiaotian, Wang Qian
Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 28;12:759057. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.759057. eCollection 2022.
Surgery remains the most effective cancer treatment, but residual disease in the form of scattered micro-metastases and tumor cells is usually unavoidable. Whether minimal residual disease results in clinical metastases is a function of host defense and tumor survival and growth. The much interesting intersection of anesthesiology and immunology has drawn increasing clinical interest, particularly, the existing concern of the possibility that the perioperative and intraoperative anesthetic care of the surgical oncology patient could meaningfully influence tumor recurrence. This paper examines current data, including recent large clinical trials to determine whether the current level of evidence warrants a change in practice. Available pieces of evidence from clinical studies are particularly limited, largely retrospective, smaller sample size, and often contradictory, causing several questions and providing few answers. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials, including the largest study (NCT00418457), report no difference in cancer recurrence between regional and general anesthesia after potentially curative surgery. Until further evidence strongly implicates anesthesia in future clinical trials, clinicians may continue to choose the optimum anesthetic-analgesic agents and techniques in consultation with their cancer patients, based on their expertise and current best practice.
手术仍然是最有效的癌症治疗方法,但以散在微转移和肿瘤细胞形式存在的残留疾病通常难以避免。微小残留疾病是否会导致临床转移取决于宿主防御以及肿瘤的存活和生长。麻醉学与免疫学之间这个非常有趣的交叉领域已引起越来越多的临床关注,特别是目前人们担心外科肿瘤患者的围手术期和术中麻醉护理是否会对肿瘤复发产生重大影响。本文研究了当前的数据,包括近期的大型临床试验,以确定当前的证据水平是否足以支持改变实践。临床研究中可用的证据特别有限,大多是回顾性的,样本量较小,而且常常相互矛盾,引发了诸多问题但提供的答案却很少。近期的随机对照临床试验,包括规模最大的研究(NCT00418457),报告称在进行了潜在根治性手术后,区域麻醉和全身麻醉在癌症复发方面没有差异。在未来临床试验中有更有力的证据强烈表明麻醉与癌症复发有关之前,临床医生可以继续根据自己的专业知识和当前的最佳实践,与癌症患者协商选择最佳的麻醉镇痛药物和技术。