Suppr超能文献

在从奶牛乳房分离出的葡萄球菌鉴定中,将STAPH-Ident和STAPH-Trac系统与传统方法进行比较。

A comparison of the STAPH-Ident and STAPH-Trac systems to conventional methods in the identification of staphylococci isolated from bovine udders.

作者信息

Watts J L, Nickerson S C

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 1986 Jul;12(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(86)90079-9.

Abstract

The STAPH-Ident and STAPH-Trac systems (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) were compared to conventional methods for identification of staphylococci isolated from bovine udders. The STAPH-Ident system identified 80.5% of isolates correctly. An additional 7.6% of Staphylococcus hyicus strains were delineated from S. epidermidis by characterizing acetoin and pigment production. Final accuracy of the STAPH-Ident system was 88.1%. The STAPH-Trac system identified 66.1% of isolates. Negative phosphatase tests for 42.3% of S. hyicus strains resulted in misidentification as S. simulans. Consequently, only 45.5% of S. hyicus isolates were identified correctly by the STAPH-Trac system. Minor modification of each system would permit accurate, rapid identification of staphylococci isolated from bovine udders.

摘要

将STAPH-Ident和STAPH-Trac系统(Analytab Products公司,纽约州普莱恩维尤)与用于鉴定从牛乳房分离出的葡萄球菌的传统方法进行了比较。STAPH-Ident系统正确鉴定了80.5%的分离株。通过对乙酰甲基甲醇和色素产生进行特征分析,又从表皮葡萄球菌中区分出了另外7.6%的猪葡萄球菌菌株。STAPH-Ident系统的最终准确率为88.1%。STAPH-Trac系统鉴定了66.1%的分离株。42.3%的猪葡萄球菌菌株磷酸酶试验呈阴性,导致被误鉴定为模仿葡萄球菌。因此,STAPH-Trac系统仅正确鉴定了45.5%的猪葡萄球菌分离株。对每个系统进行微小修改将能够准确、快速地鉴定从牛乳房分离出的葡萄球菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验